DAWN DE BUSK\Frontiersman reporter
PALMER - A brilliant round-cut diamond engagement ring adorned a finger of Tanya Alston's left hand as she sat by her fiancé in Palmer City Council chambers during a recent meeting. Although Alston is looking forward to her November wedding date, the fulfillment of her ring's promise will spell the end of her job with the city.
|
|
The Palmer City Council on Feb. 28 voted to ask the city attorney to rewrite the nepotism rule to allow a little more leeway for city employees who work in the same department and live in the same house. City council members Jim Wood and Larry Hill introduced the memorandum.
The rule prevents unrelated people who live under the same roof as well as any family members from being employed in the same department, and is not specific to only supervisory roles, Wood said.
Council member Tony Pippel clarified that the rewording would not be for one specific situation, but to create an ordinance that was more fair toward all city employees.
Already, the nepotism rule has altered some of Alston and LaCroix's plans.
To prepare for the loss of income, the couple purchased a home a year earlier than previously planned and moved in together, Alston said. They decided Alston would give her notice because it would be more difficult for LaCroix to find a position with another police department, Alston said.
Because they were both hired prior to Oct. 12, 2004, they have grandfather rights over a law that was later added to the books, which says that anyone living in the same house for more than 60 days may not work in the same department or hold jobs in which one person is supervised by another.
“It's OK for us to ‘live in sin' but not to get married,” she said. “You should read that nepotism law. It's really strict. The rule is archaic.”
Wood agreed, saying the city should return to the original reason nepotism laws came into existence - so the boss couldn't hire family members to fill all the choice positions regardless of their qualifications.
“The ordinance we have now is overly restrictive. It's more restrictive than the state's law,” Wood said. “It restricts two people from working in the same department if they've lived together for 60 days or more. I don't know where that came from.”
If something happened and a natural disaster occurred, Wood said, forcing Palmer to set up temporary housing for people, all the city employees bunked together for more than two months would be breaking the city's ordinance.
Palmer's nepotism ruling prevents established police officers or firefighters from helping their sons launch a career in those fields, Wood said. “This ruling would diminish a cornerstone of American employment,” he said.
Wood said he was aware of LaCroix and Alston's plight only peripherally, but the ordinance came to his attention when the council was reworking the personnel regulations.
“It's always been something that needed to be attended to,” he said. “By and large, it discourages the city's ability to hire the best.”
Council member Brad Hanson said during a recent meeting that he sees some advantages to couples working in the same department.
“Nepotism serves to more fully have a management staff that is more responsive to one another,” Hanson said. “Say the chief of police and the public works director were married and reported to the city manager. They would make a good management team.”
City manager Tom Healy said that was an unusual situation he would avoid.
City Attorney Jack Snodgrass said the ordinance could be rewritten to forbid department heads from being married to each other. Snodgrass will have a completed rewriting of the ordinance to present to the council during a work session at 6 p.m. on March 28.
“The way the law stands, it's broken and it needs fixing,” Mayor John Combs said.
Contact Dawn De Busk at 352-2252 or dawn.debusk@frontiersman.com.
Comments
25 comment(s)anita wrote on Mar 7, 2009 4:08 PM:
you have the right to judge? u must not have a life, or anyone in your family who have had altercations in their youth that made them grow up, and furthermore, the thing that matters, is, if they turn out to be useful good members of society, right? are u perfect? exactly! "
Gerry Ardo wrote on Nov 15, 2008 1:59 PM:
jill wrote on Nov 5, 2008 6:15 AM:
LMAO wrote on Oct 28, 2008 9:04 PM:
The Truth wrote on Oct 5, 2008 11:48 AM:
Michigan Lady wrote on Oct 5, 2008 8:48 AM:
Michiganvoter wrote on Oct 1, 2008 5:53 PM:
Marci Bereu wrote on Sep 24, 2008 3:25 PM:
The report is true, including going into the army to avoid jail. I'm sure strings can be pulled for kids of VIP parents. "
Steve McAdam wrote on Sep 16, 2008 4:19 PM:
California Gal wrote on Sep 16, 2008 3:23 PM:
Doug Polcin wrote on Sep 14, 2008 9:49 AM:
Will wrote on Sep 13, 2008 6:31 PM:
Log Dog wrote on Sep 11, 2008 2:27 PM:
Fran wrote on Sep 11, 2008 12:32 PM:
DEMSWRONG wrote on Sep 10, 2008 4:15 PM:
Rock Roll wrote on Sep 9, 2008 9:42 AM:
wes wrote on Sep 8, 2008 8:08 AM:
Jay wrote on Sep 6, 2008 4:58 PM:
Sue wrote on Sep 6, 2008 1:14 AM:
Foobar wrote on Sep 5, 2008 2:59 PM:
The entire Palin family is like a well-dressed episode of Jerry Springer. "
MrUniteUs wrote on Sep 5, 2008 5:31 AM:
Was Sarah Palin's son "Track Palin" arrested for vandalism ... Most recently there is discussion that Track Palin, then 16, was one of the 3 boys arrested for vandalizing 44 Mat-Su school buses - an incident that forced ...
answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080904193702AAGlSCL - "
aklocal wrote on Sep 2, 2008 8:07 PM:
Destyne Pope wrote on Feb 12, 2008 4:20 AM:
vacation wrote on Jan 30, 2008 12:39 PM:
Thank you! "
Nyakeh Sam Suale wrote on Nov 14, 2007 10:59 AM: