Ballot results spark another eventful debate at MEA


Published on Sunday, August 5, 2007 10:51 AM AKDT

Aug. 5, 2007

Spectrum: Darin Markwardt

“Knock, knock.”

Boss: Come in

Worker: Good morning sir, how are ...

Boss: What's the news?

Worker: Great news sir! The ballots are in and 75 percent of those voting want local power generation!

Boss: Ha! I knew it! The people want a coal plant!

Worker: Well, sir, not really ...

Boss: What do mean “not really!” Matanuska Electric Association voters have spoken - they want coal!

Worker: Well, sir, the people simply voted about whether MEA should stay with Chugach Electric or become independent. Coal really wasn't on the ballot.

Boss: Son, you're a little slow.

Worker: Sir?

Boss: Son, those ballot results say whatever I want them to say. Just because we “encouraged ...”

Worker: “Manipulated.”

Boss: Whatever. Just because we manipulated a certain result does not mean that we shouldn't take full advantage of those lovely results.

Worker: By lying?

Boss: By expounding upon a fact or two.

Worker: Ah.

Boss: For example, I'll bet we didn't even get 25 percent of MEA members to vote.

Worker: No sir, only 23 percent responded.

Boss: So, out of the 23 percent who responded, 75 percent want local power?

Worker: Yep.

Boss: So that's a 4-1 margin of victory?

Worker: Yes sir.

Boss: Make it 5-1.

Worker: Isn't that lying sir?

Boss: Not if we say, “By nearly a 5-1 margin.”

Worker: How mathematic.

Boss: I think so.

Worker: So, when I proclaim the “nearly 5-1 victory,” should I send out a press release stating that a majority ...

Boss: Call it a mandate.

Worker: Excuse me?

Boss: Don't just call it a majority. Call it a mandate. Say that we have a mandate from a clear, overwhelming majority of the people.

Worker: Well sir, a mandate is actually when a majority of the people vote a certain way - in a real election.

Boss: A “real election?”

Worker: Well sir, you can hardly call our election real. We sent out a ballot with two options. One was obviously the good choice and the other was obviously bad. And then you told them how to vote in the accompanying newsletter.

Boss: I don't apologize for that, son! I'm a man of the people. I simply broke down the message so that the good people didn't have to trouble themselves with all that thinkin' and wonderin'.

Worker: How thoughtful.

Boss: And that‘s why I also shot that TV commercial. It alleviated the mental suffering of thousands of voters.

Worker: You're all heart, sir.

Boss: And that part about California regulations, what a success!

Worker: Yes sir, you really threw out that California label. But you did neglect to mention how those regulations would actually hurt Alaska.

Boss: Yep. It was a stroke of genius. Say that name of a hated state - then move on.

Worker: But sir, don't you think that it was a bit shady to tell people how to vote on your own ballot?

Boss: (sighs) Son?

Worker: Yes sir?

Boss: Did we win?

Worker: Um, I guess sir. We got the result that we bought, er, wanted.

Boss: Then is there anything else you need from me?

Worker: Just one more thing sir. It seems that we have a bit of a public relations issue.

Boss: Oh?

Worker: Yes sir, it seems that 56 percent of the Valley does not like the way MEA conducts business.

Boss: Now where did you get a number like that?

Worker: It was a scientific poll conducted by the Borough ...

Boss: There you go again with the science! When are you gonna learn that science is in the eye of the beholder?

Worker: Um ...

Boss: How many people did the Borough get for this little poll?

Worker: 407.

Boss: 407? You're telling me that 407 people got polled and I should care?

Worker: Well sir, like I said, it was scientific poll, which means it used the same methods that all nationwide polls ...

Boss: Son!

Worker: Yes sir.

Boss: How many votes did we get?

Worker: 7,000.

Boss: How many people were in the Borough-wide poll?

Worker: About 400.

Boss: So we have 7,000 and they have a few hundred. We have more, they have less.

Worker: Well sir, unlike our vote, they're poll wasn't manipulative. It actually represented the true feelings of a majority of the Valley residents ...

Boss: Son. We have two numbers: 7000 and 400. Which one is more?

Worker: 7,000, sir.

Boss: And what does that give us?

Worker: A mandate for coal, sir.

Boss: You're learning, son. Now leave my office. I've got Usibelli on line 3.

Comments

1 comment(s)

    Michael McLaughlin wrote on Oct 13, 2007 9:48 AM:

    " nice story but the animal cruelty is happening again over in the small town of Sutton where just last year a women was charged with 56 counts of animal abuse endangerment of animal's no kennel license all the while in-breeding the dog's without permission from the state & once again living in squaller that makes the ghetto look like the home of Mr clean the police have been told yet the police or anyone has done nothing help the animal's before they die of living in squaller again "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Classifieds




Make Us Your Homepage