Future belongs to people of hope

By Howard Bess
Religion Views
Published on Thursday, January 3, 2008 8:28 PM AKST

In the life of Christian churches, we are now in early January completing the seasons of Advent and Christmas. Baptists are not known for a lot of ritual. We specialize in singing, reading the Bible and sermonizing. We do not do incense. We do not do much with fancy garments. Reading liturgies out of a book is quite foreign.

But in Church of the Covenant, especially during the Advent/Christmas seasons, we do light a few candles. Jesus said that his followers were to be the light of the world, so we regularly light one or two candles every Sunday as our witness that we will be a light in the darkest of the world’s rooms. Then during the Advent and Christmas season, we take candle lighting to a higher level. We light five candles as a reminder of basic Christian virtues.

In order, we light a candle for hope, then one for peace, then joy. We follow with the faith candle and finally light a candle as a witness to love.

Hope, peace, joy, faith and love. If it takes lighting a few candles to remind us of what it means to follow Jesus, I am all for lighting candles.

The ardent evangelist Paul from Tarsus, when writing to his friends in the city of Corinth, called faith, hope and love the big three. Just now, I am especially intrigued by hope and the transformation that takes place with people who practice hope. What does it mean to hope?

I recently read a quote about hope from the Czech playwright, novelist and poet, Vaclav Havel. This is what he said: “Hope is definitely not the same as optimism. Hope is not the conviction that something will turn out well, but the certainty that something makes sense regardless of how it turns out.”

I was so intrigued by the quote I did a little homework about Vaclav Havel. He is still alive and still writing. He has written out of a context that is very troubled. He was born in 1936 and so was a very young child when Hitler annexed Czechoslovakia to the Third Reich. Following World War II, his homeland fell under the control of the Soviet Union. Czechoslovakia became a part of the Warsaw Pact and found itself behind the Iron Curtain of Soviet-style communism.

Vaclav and his family were not cooperators with the systems under which they lived. Vaclav was denied educational opportunities and was imprisoned four different times. No matter where he was, he continued writing. Hope as optimism does not work in such circumstances. Havel’s kind of hope does.

Havel survived the years of darkness and, though he had no great interest in politics, after the demise of the Soviet Union he became the president of the Czech Republic. He worked diligently on undoing the Warsaw Pact and shepherded his country into new relationships with the European family of nations. For his writings and for his political activities, Vaclav Havel has been honored by Amnesty International and was awarded the prestigious Gandhi Peace Prize.

I owe a great debt to Havel for reminding me that hope is not to be equated with optimism. As I ponder hope, I realize my key heroes lived confidently in terrible circumstances. Jesus granted pardon to those who were executing him. I love the Bible story of Joseph, who suffered horribly but found purpose in his plight. I think of prophets like Isaiah and Jeremiah, of Francis from Assisi, Martin Luther King Jr. and Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Every one of them lived in horrible circumstances, but lived lives with hope and confidence that could never be quenched.

As we enter the New Year, I confess I do not have a lot of optimism. I grieve for our world. I grieve for our environment. I grieve for the oceans, the lakes, the rivers and the streams. I grieve for a humanity that is incredibly greedy to the demise of kindness. I grieve for my nation that believes peace, freedom and security can be attained by killing.

During 2008, I will make an honest effort to treat our environment more kindly. I will make an honest effort to be a kind and loving person in all my relationships. I will make an honest effort to be a good steward of all the resources placed in my hands. I will do my very best because it is right to do so.

As I do my best in 2008, I will do so with little optimism about the outcomes. I will, however, live with the confidence that comes from genuine hope.

I will keep lighting candles as a reminder.

The Rev. Howard Bess is pastor of Church of the Covenant, an American Baptist church in Palmer. His e-mail address is hdbss@mtaonline.net.

Comments

15 comment(s)

    Parenthesis wrote on Jan 19, 2008 9:47 AM:

    " I agree! Isn't it amazing how judgemental people can't see their own faults? It must be pride that blinds this person's eyes. I'll bet in the dictionary next to the word hypocrite you'll find a photo of this cretin. Missing the forest is quite a bit of irony in himself. I think the cultural expression is "punk." "

    Publius wrote on Jan 13, 2008 7:50 PM:

    " Democritus,it is with a joyous heart that this posting is being written. You, my dearest Democritus, and yours truly agree with each other. Your comment dated:"Democritus wrote on Jan 4, 2008 6:55 PM" is superb.
    Your sentiments were spot-on and you accuratly responded to nit-pikking and puny comments. How much longer we may enjoy this level of intellectual honesty? It is refreshing while it lasts. If the same principles are applied more liberally by all commentators, we would find so very little to disagree about except the core principles of one's world-view. On these principles we may happily disagree. "

    To Democritus wrote on Jan 11, 2008 8:50 PM:

    " Intentionally misunderstand each other? How did you come to that conclusion. Sounds more like they were trying to seriously understand. And from reading some of your other posts the "leftist" comment seems a fit description. I feel bad for the original poster and the personal attacks you and the others here have leeveled at him or her. If the person is a troubled soul you probably made it worse with your hateful comments. You should log off your computer and never post your uncivilized comments ever again. Leave now. Don't respond. Bye! "

    Democritus wrote on Jan 6, 2008 10:47 PM:

    " Just so you will know, whether your soul is troubled or not, I'm not a leftist anything. Interesting how you seem to think you know what I believe politically. "

    yes sunk wrote on Jan 6, 2008 3:03 PM:

    " You find offense in almost anyone that disagrees with you, it seems. Your disdain for Rev. Bess and whoever seems fairly evident. I made a simple statement earlier and you tried dragging me into your web too. So "troubled soul" or whatever, the shoe seems to fit. "

    Sunk to Insult wrote on Jan 6, 2008 1:05 PM:

    " I was wondering when it was going to happen. I made a comment about what appears to be, in my opinion, an offensive political statement in a so-called faith article. And now someone attempting to defend the statement in question sinks to personal insult. How is it that you find "hate" in my comments? How is it that my opinions show that I'm a "troubled soul?" It's what always happens when someone expressing their feelings about certain inflamatory subjects: when the other side of the debate is unable to fully justify their comments, they sink to personal insult. "

    Your connection? wrote on Jan 6, 2008 12:00 PM:

    " I find it strange, the conclusions that you jump to. You "surmise" incorrectly. There is no hidden meaning, secret agenda, or claim about the United States. If you are making those connections in your head, you must be a troubled soul. My statements are actually very simple, straight forward and historical fact. I'm not putting anyone down but I am suggesting it may be better to be more Christ-like than christian-like, considering past and recent history.
    Show a little less hate of those that may disagree with your version of life. "

    There You Have It wrote on Jan 6, 2008 11:30 AM:

    " You've equated the present-day with the days of the crusades. I can only surmise that you, the leftist Democritus, and "Rev" Bess believe the present war in Iraq and the crusades were, by and large, the same. I go back to the claim: pure nonsense! What are you saying...that the United States is a Christian nation? Please, go back and read the Bess article on "separation of church and state." No, the problem I have is that Bess refuses to fully state his true feelings. Maybe that's a good thing; however, statements like the one I highlighed do offend. "

    to C'mon wrote on Jan 5, 2008 6:41 PM:

    " No one asked you to feel guilt or anguish. I just made a statement and backed it up. The point is Christians have been killing from the time the church became connected with governmental power around 315 and continues to the present day. I'm guessing had Christ known all that has been done in the name of Christ, he may have been greatly disappointed. Another point being made is it may be better to be more like Christ and less christian like. If the crusades bothers you, how about Protestants and Catholics in North Ireland?...there are many examples. "

    C'mon Now wrote on Jan 5, 2008 3:13 PM:

    " We're now to take on the guilt for ALL past wars and persecutions conducted in the name of Christ. I, for one, refuse to live like that. Just as I'll never feel guilt when someone says my race is responsible for this or that past evil. I wasn't around and participating in the world system until I was old enough to vote. To anguish yourself over evils done long ago is sad. And it always sickens me when someone chimes in with the example of the Crusades. Crusaders were about as Christian as Judas was. "

    in a nutshell wrote on Jan 4, 2008 8:40 PM:

    " It's simple enough really. Christ never killed anyone. Christians however have a long history of killing. (Yes, in the millions)It started with the killing of Pagans, especially those that wished not to convert. Crusades by the number, Holy wars, Inquisitions, Heretics beheaded and burned at the stake, Witches in the thousands burned or hanged, Native "heathen" peoples in the hundreds of thousands put to the sword, Religious wars (Christians killing others and Christians killing Christians)..."nonsense"...your denial certainly is. The "Subtle difference statement"..pure sarcasm. So I too hope that someday we learn from history and change. "

    Democritus wrote on Jan 4, 2008 6:55 PM:

    " Goodness, you people really are just looking for any reason you can to fight with one another. You intentionally misunderstand people so you can jump on their comments. And just for the record, our national policies are certainly different from the sentiments of many of our citizens. No reasonable person can read Bess's statement and think he believes we are a nation full of violent people. He is clearly speaking of national policies and a foreign policy of pre-emptive war and continual threats to sovereign nations. Anyone not trying to be offended can see that. "

    Pure Nonsense wrote on Jan 4, 2008 6:39 PM:

    " To "In a nutshell" -- Is your comment in answer to "Don't understand?" If so, it is pure nonsense. If it isn't in response to the first comment, it's still nonsensical. Are you saying that the Bess article means we are a Christian nation and have killed millions? I'd also would like to know what you mean by the closing statement: "I know it's just a subtle difference." You mean there's just a sutle difference in the teachings of Christ who "never killed anyone" and "so called Christians" who "have killed millions?" This is beyond understanding...worse than nonsensical. "

    in a nutshell wrote on Jan 4, 2008 4:53 PM:

    " You don't understand the difference between Christ and christians. Christ, from what I can tell, never killed anyone. So called Christians have killed millions. I know it's just a subtle difference. "

    Don't Understand wrote on Jan 4, 2008 10:19 AM:

    " I read this Bess article with the HOPE of getting to the end without seeing anything political or derogotory. Alas, it jumped out right near the end: "I grieve for my nation that believes peace, freedom and security can be attained by killing." How is it that "Rev" Bess comes to the conclusion that we, collectively as a nation, believe that peace, freedom, and security are attained by killing??? I really fail to understand that statement and, as a citizen of this nation, am deeply offended by such commentary. Mr. Bess: You, sir, need to justify this. Explain please!
    "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Classifieds




Make Us Your Homepage