After all, why would anyone want to know why all these people worked to petition to change the bylaws in the first place? Shouldn’t we all just take Babcock’s word for it?
MEA is using our member dollars to tell us not to vote for something that got more than 620 signatures on a petition in just a few days when only 300 were needed. It wants us vote down something that to so many just makes sense. They are using our money (again) to advertise to us about how we really should all be good and vote the way MEA management tells us.
|
|
Babcock says MEA has a fiduciary responsibility and that’s why only one side of the story can be told to members. The fiduciary relationship, above all, is one of good faith, loyalty and trust. Are you feeling the good faith, loyalty and trust here?
Marilyn Wilson,
Willow

Comments
11 comment(s)Justice wrote on Feb 12, 2008 3:37 PM:
What goes around... wrote on Feb 11, 2008 4:46 PM:
To the editor: This must stay Anonymous for personal reasons, if you don't post it that'd be fine with me; I just had to let someone know "
progress wrote on Feb 11, 2008 3:13 PM:
Burchell and Kinkaid are to be trusted to look out for our interests. And when you eventually get seated, please consider cleaning house! "
Time for Change at MEA wrote on Feb 11, 2008 10:13 AM:
PR Budget? wrote on Feb 8, 2008 2:52 PM:
Concerned resident wrote on Feb 7, 2008 4:04 AM:
Our best hope is to support Peter Burchell and Janet Kinkaid, and give them our full support in the next MEA election. Let's come together as a coop, and look our for our best interests this time, and vote in people who will stand for fairness and the coop members. "
The Reason for the Bylaw... wrote on Feb 5, 2008 12:52 PM:
Palin House Cleaning wrote on Feb 5, 2008 12:40 PM:
Do I Trust MEA? wrote on Feb 5, 2008 12:21 PM:
MEA corruption wrote on Feb 5, 2008 10:46 AM:
Jordan has to go. Baird is a party hack and is worse than Tuckerman.
Kincaid and Burchell are the best choices. "
Indefensible wrote on Feb 5, 2008 8:43 AM: