Fishing for answers

By MATT TUNSETH
Frontiersman
Published on Monday, February 11, 2008 9:06 PM AKST

ANCHORAGE — The Alaska Board of Fisheries has designated northern district sockeye salmon as a “stock of concern,” a tag likely to lead to intensive study of the struggling Mat-Su salmon populations — but not to any immediate restrictions on commercial or sport harvests.

 The designation will help the Alaska Department of Fish and Game take steps to identify what may be causing diminished returns to Mat-Su salmon streams such as the Susitna, Yentna and Fish Creek. Last summer, the Yentna — a Susitna tributary used to gauge the strength of the larger river's overall return — fell short of its 90,000 sockeye escapement goal for the third time in the past five years and fifth time in the past seven.

 Because of the designation, it's hoped the Alaska Legislature will be willing to appropriate $10 million in funds the department estimates is needed to carry out further study.

ROBERT DeBERRY/Frontiersman Tim Wood, 14, walks through the tall grass along the edge of Cottonwood Creek carrying a red that he caught during the summer of 2007. Mat-Su sockeye returns have become a concern for Valley anglers.

 But it doesn't mean any immediate changes to the current management plan, a fact that isn't sitting well with Mat-Su sport fishermen who believe steps should be taken to restrict central district Cook Inlet commercial fishermen in order to allow more northern district fish to pass into the northern end of the inlet.

 “It's a big step in the right direction, but we feel it doesn't go far enough,” said Steve Runyan, who serves on the Susitna Valley Fish and Game advisory committee.

 During its deliberation process, the board heard from Fish and Game staff who said they're not entirely sure why Mat-Su sockeye populations have dropped. Cook Inlet commercial fisheries biologist Jeff Fox said Monday that in order to get a handle on the problem, Fish and Game will need to spend millions of dollars on studies, genetic sampling and equipment — such as more weirs to allow for accurate counting — before it can venture a guess as to why northern district stocks struggle while returns to the Kenai and Kasilof rivers further south are robust. Some current theories include pike predation, low water levels, floods, beaver dams, and overfishing by commercial fishermen.

 “It's probably a combination of all those things,” Fox said.

 Money isn't yet available to further study the affected areas. However, Fox said the department will request funds through the Legislature.

 The board has been meeting since the beginning of the month to consider management of all Upper Cook Inlet sport, personal use and commercial fishing regulations. Since the board meets just once every three years to consider the area, much is at stake for user groups hoping to see changes. Although the meeting is typically dominated by voices from the Kenai Peninsula, Mat-Su Valley anglers have spoken out loudly on the issue of diminished salmon returns to the northern district.

Runyan said Mat-Su anglers had hoped the board would do more to cut back on how many fish are intercepted by commercial drift nets in the central district. Runyan said he believes commercial fishermen should share the burden of conservation, and doesn't understand why the board decided not to take action.

 “I don't see how that is in keeping with a precautionary approach to salmon management,” Runyan said.

 Drift gillnet fishermen have a different point of view. United Cook Inlet Drift Association executive director Roland Maw said he does not believe the sockeye returns are as dire as they're made out to be.

 “It's not a crisis,” Maw said, pointing out that sonar counts used to determine returns on the Yentna are believed to be lower than what's been seen where the more accurate weir counts are used.

 Jeff Fox said it's likely that fisheries managers are under-counting sockeye returns due to inaccuracies in sonar data, and that's why more weirs are needed. Weirs can differentiate between salmon species, where sonar typically cannot.

 “It's not just under-counting, it's an apportionment issue with the other species,” Fox said.

 Maw said commercial fishermen do recognize returns aren't what they used to be, and his group supports further research that will come out of the stock of concern designation.

 “We don't think this is harvest driven, we think this is production driven up in the lakes,” Maw said.

 Maw believes the board's actions not to restrict commercial fishermen was appropriate. And, he said, UCIDA is prepared to pitch in with funding for further study of Susitna River drainage lakes where sockeye salmon spawn.

 “We're willing to put some cash on the table to help solve this issue,” he said.

 Maw said it's in the interest of his industry to help study the problem to ensure Mat-Su sockeye runs rebound.

 “Obviously, it's in our economic best interest to do that,” he said.

 The fight between northern district sport fishermen and central district commercial fishermen isn't over yet. The board is scheduled to continue its deliberations today, and can still make changes to management plans.

 However, Susitna Valley advisory committee chair Bruce Knowles doesn't see that happening, and plans to take Mat-Su anglers' concerns to the Alaska Legislature or possibly to the ballot box through the initiative process in order to force fisheries managers to cut commercial time and pass more fish through to the Valley. As it currently stands, Knowles said the stock of concern designation is essentially a toothless edict.

 “This is a stock of concern without a concern,” Knowles said.

 Knowles he's disappointed by what he thinks is a lack of urgency on the part of both Cook Inlet biologists and commercial fishermen of what Mat-Su sport anglers believe is an impending crisis.

 “Nobody is concerned about the fish.”

 Some other notable measures taken by the board over the weekend include:

 • Decreasing the daily bag limit on Big Lake burbot from five to two and establishing a closed burbot season on Big Lake between March 15 and May 1 to protect spawning fish;

 • Allowing five lines to be fished simultaneously when ice fishing for pike in the Knik Arm drainage; and

 • Expanding the open king fishing area at the Eklutna Tailrace.

 Contact Matt Tunseth at 352-2265 or matt.tunseth@

frontiersman.com

Comments

5 comment(s)

    FOJ wrote on Feb 16, 2008 4:52 AM:

    " commercial fleets are thieves its a joke sport fisherman get the short end every time , i fish Alexander creek and now they want to close it . its roughly 10 miles from the ocean, and all the fish runs are worse every year do you think if those nets weren't in the water they would talk about shutting down a river so close to the ocean, i don't and we all know the truth everyones fish are being lost to commercial fishing we. don't need any more studies, how much more money needs to be waisted. "

    Dirtwater Fox wrote on Feb 13, 2008 8:41 AM:

    " Hey Susitna Slim, You know, the main problem is that so many people have come to the Valley, and Alaska in general to fish. Then, many thought they'd start a guided fishing business on a run that isn't large enough to support all the upriver pressure on waters that were once considered a sanctuary for spawning. Then rules got bent and broken, and along the way, someone thought it would be cute to add Pike. These are the problems to fish populations in the Mat-Su. I can prove that hundreds if not thousands of commercial fishermen live in Mat-Su. "

    Angler wrote on Feb 13, 2008 7:59 AM:

    " Very few anglers target sockeyes in the susitna drainage, pressure is not causeing the problem. Commercial fishing at the very least is stealing. As an Alaskan resident under the constitution I own an equal share of the resources in this state, then how can a user group, commercial fisherman, take 1000 times more and sell them then I? If escapement is not being met, don't fish. Susbsistance is a non issue in upper cook inlet, then escapement should be met, then if there is an abundance in one river, net in the river. "

    Tom Hermon wrote on Feb 12, 2008 11:04 AM:

    " Once again Bruce knowles comments on the commercial fishing industry has no merit. What Mr. knowles fails to realize is the fact that valley streams continue to see more pressure from anglers. The numbers of commercial fisherman do not change, however our amount of fishing time has been greatly reduced over the years. Take a look at your own user group, Mr. Knowles. Could it be that you are perhaps the cause of this problem? Once again your ill advised comments have placed you up a creek without a paddle. "

    Susitna Slim wrote on Feb 12, 2008 9:45 AM:

    " Great, let's waste another ten million dollars of the tax payers money on another study. Bruce Knowles is right, as much as it pains me to agree with a Knowles. Have you ever looked out over Cook Inlet during the summer, it's nets as far as you can see. It's truely amazing that a fish can even make it to a stream on the Kenai Pen. much less to the Mat Valley streams. Netters are thieves, and they are getting rich stealing our resources from us. What's worse is a lot of them don't even live here. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Classifieds




Make Us Your Homepage