Anchorage Democrat calls for Troopergate witness tampering investigation


Published on Tuesday, October 21, 2008 12:59 PM AKDT

The back-and-forth between McCain-Palin spokeswoman Meg Stapleton and Rep. Les Gara, D-Anchorage, is still on-going.

And now, Gara is asking the state’s attorney general for an investigation into possible witness tampering leading up the Legislature’s Troopergate report.

Gara and Stapleton most infamously met on the street in Anchorage Oct. 10 just after the Legislative Council released its Troopergate report.

In front of media cameras and other onlookers, Gara asked Stapleton if she was going to apologize to former Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan.

Gara said Stapleton, who was one half the now-quiet Palin Truth Squad, slandered Monegan for weeks leading up to the Troopergate probe’s release in an effort to discredit the investigation.

Stapleton did not apologize.

The Legislature’s report found Gov. Sarah Palin abused her office by trying to get her former brother-in-law, trooper Mike Wooten, fired.

Most recently, Gara sent a letter to Alaska State Troopers Col. Audie Holloway asking for an investigation into possible witness tampering.

Gara said it’s clear to him someone in the McCain-Palin campaign told subpoenaed witnesses not to testify in the probe because those same witnesses at first agreed to cooperate, then declined to honor their subpoenas.

In a press release, Gara says what many media outlets have been reporting.

"Until Senator McCain sent campaign staff up here on Aug. 29, everyone, including the governor, agreed the Legislature's investigation was proper,” Gara says. “After the McCain staffers arrived, people who were willing to testify starting violating their subpoenas. It’s not rocket science that someone worked to change their minds, and that's a crime under Alaska law.”

Holloway wrote back to Gara telling him they troopers could not get involved, most notably because the troopers are a central figure in the Troopergate investigation.

But, Holloway urged Gara that a joint legislative and executive directive for AST to hire an independent investigator is a possibility.

Gara is now seeking just that.

The decision brought a sharp response from Stapleton, who called Gara’s request a “political stunt.”

In an e-mail, Stapleton also defends the McCain-Palin campaign.

“No one from the McCain campaign provided advice to witnesses on how to respond to subpoenas,” Stapleton said.

She also accuses Gara of working with Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama’s campaign since last year.

Gara said this week that’s nonsense.

“No, I’m not working for the Obama campaign,” he said.

Gara added that he’s simply following the advice of the troopers and someone should ask Stapleton why he should ignore that advice.

As to Stapleton’s e-mailed statement about Gara, he says he won’t dignify it with a comment.

Here’s what Stapleton wrote:

"This is yet another political stunt from Representative Les Gara, a Democratic Alaska state legislator who has been working with the Obama campaign since last year.

Rep. Gara's previous hijinks include sending a letter to the Alaska State Troopers making a similar baseless accusation, and engaging in a sidewalk ambush in front of television cameras and reporters.

Decisions on how to respond to subpoenas in the Legislative Council's inquiry were made by individual witnesses and their attorneys. No one from the McCain campaign provided advice to witnesses on how to respond to subpoenas.

Consistent with other efforts of Obama supporters nationwide to try to squelch legitimate political debate with baseless threats of criminal investigations of those who dare to take opposing positions, Rep. Les Gara has reverted to these tactics in Alaska once again. Law enforcement's purpose is to protect the public, not to serve a political agenda."

- Meg Stapleton

And here’s Gara’s release:

  

ANCHORAGE -- Today an Alaska legislator called on the State's Attorney General to appoint an independent investigator to look into possible criminal witness tampering by McCain-Palin campaign staff in Alaska. Rep. Gara's call came at the suggestion of the Director of the Alaska State Troopers, who called the potential of witness tampering matter "serious.”

Director of the State Troopers, Colonel Audie Holloway, suggested in his letter that the state call on the State Troopers to hire an independent investigator.

Over the past two months McCain-Palin campaign staff tried to stop the Alaska legislature's bi-partisan Troopergate investigation, which recently concluded with a  report that that state's ethics law was broken. See Michael Isakoff, Newsweek, "Can He Stop Troopergate?" (Sept. 16, 2008).  

"Until Senator McCain sent campaign staff up here on August 29, everyone, including the Governor, agreed the Legislature’s investigation was proper. After the McCain staffers arrived, people who were willing to testify starting violating their subpoenas. It's not rocket science that someone worked to change their minds, and that's a crime under Alaska law," said Rep. Gara.  

The legislative investigation was initiated by a bi-partisan committee of 8 Republicans and 4 Democrats in July, before Governor Palin was named to the McCain ticket. On October 10 that committee voted unanimously to release the independent investigator's report finding one ethics violation, and finding that the Attorney General had improperly withheld documents.

Alaska's witness tampering law makes it a crime to "attempt" to "induce" a person not to show up for a legislative subpoena. See statutes below. Approximately 10 witnesses failed to show for subpoenas during the Legislature's investigation into whether Governor Palin or her staff acted improperly in seeking the firing of her former brother-in-law, a State Trooper. After failing to cooperate with subpoenas, these witnesses have since provided written statements.

Starting on August 29 the McCain campaign tried to create public pressure to stop the investigation with near-daily press conferences, and participated in unsuccessful legal efforts to try to stop the investigation.

The independent investigation concluded on October 10, 2008, when the investigator's report was released by a unanimous vote of the Alaska Legislature's Legislative Council. A separate investigation by the State's Personnel Board is ongoing.

-Michael Rovito, reporter

Comments

22 comment(s)

    MAXKATT from NY wrote on Oct 23, 2008 1:35 PM:

    " js...I don't believe everything I read. I review many sources (probably not enough international) and draw conclussions. NYT is a quite reputable paper. Let me know when you can actually disprove a fact I post.

    regarding "cleaing up my hole" I can only guess this was related to my comment to JP about where he lives. I hope he/and or you took no offense, as I was only teasing. I thought he and I were getting to know each other enough here that I could take that liberty. "

    jp wrote on Oct 23, 2008 1:09 PM:

    " i like maxs' posts, he at least is a bit entertaining, and somewhat informed about things (even if most are fabricated) , people do have the right to express their thoughts, and beliefs.
    these are our rights that many have fought for, so that we may enjoy.
    so remember, you can bash us, say what you want about us, but expect to get some back, as this is the American way! "

    js wrote on Oct 23, 2008 9:15 AM:

    " maxkatt clean up the hole you live in than worry about others, you shouldnt believe everything you read. "

    Terri from Maine wrote on Oct 23, 2008 8:46 AM:

    " Come along people. Of course the McCain campaign machine tampered with the investigation. They pulled Ed O'Callaghan from more important duties as US Attorney in NY overseeing national security and terrorism issue and the McCain camp (RNC?) flew him to Alaska to 'advise' the Palins in the management of this debacle.

    And what of the God Squad from Texas? The group of Evangelical lawyers flown up to 'assist'? Does anyone not see criminal action in this, not to mention the flouting of the separation of Church and State?

    No contest. "

    ulu wrote on Oct 23, 2008 7:42 AM:

    " Let's blaime Bill Clinton for Sarahs troopergate, shall we? "

    Oops wrote on Oct 22, 2008 8:01 PM:

    " Palin knows what a dead fish smells like.

    I think Alaskans got a whole boat load from our governor and dear Meg.

    Now for the "catch of the day" on Friday! We're all ears Sarah - speak! "

    MAXKATT from NY wrote on Oct 22, 2008 9:59 AM:

    " Hey Jp...I picture you pecking away at your keyboard in a spartan Ted Kaczynski like cabin with a solar pannel on the roof for juice. Toughing out winters on caribou jerky and homemade moonshine (maybe even enjoying some Northern Light). With much facial hair you periodically trek back into town for supplies. How close? :-) "

    Dynahog wrote on Oct 22, 2008 9:46 AM:

    " If Rep. Les Gara, D-Anchorage tampered with this investigation, then he should be brought up on the appropriate charges.

    As for the Investigator, he is worthy of investigation as to his qualifications.

    How can a "witness" testify to "mental state" of the Governor during a telephone call?

    How were any of the witnesses able to determine whether the Governor "knowlingly" did wrong under the Ethics Law?

    Neither of these questions can be answered by a witness claiming to have had a telephone conversation with Gov. Palin or a Cow Moose. "

    MAXKATT from NY wrote on Oct 22, 2008 9:23 AM:

    " Regarding who's paying for Obama's trip...I dunno. I'm a bit of a cynic/skeptic as well. I smell campaign strategy. Go visit Granny & force McCain/Palin to dial back angry rehtoric else appear unsympathetic. Score pts. as caring family man vs. terrorist socialist associate (which is silly, but some think it). Plus, he's in coast mode now w/ such a lead. He and Biden with comments "share wealth" & "we'll be tested" have been their own worst enemys. If they shut up, the dems might actual win this thing. :-) "

    MAXKATT from NY wrote on Oct 22, 2008 9:18 AM:

    " Jp...The expense thing is BS. Minor cost. Just my attempt 2 stir things up. However, when u hold yourself out & up as she has on fiscal matters, you increase the scrutiny. It's coming out of your state's pocket. You guys need 2 be comfortable w/ back edits 2 redefine certain travel as "business trips." The $150k clothes shopping spree the RNC has taken her one is getting attention here as well. Again, it's their right, but seems somewhat inconsistent with image she's tried to project. "

    Linda wrote on Oct 22, 2008 9:05 AM:

    " I guarantee you Obama is paying his OWN way to Hawaii....
    What a Stretch.... "

    DEBBIE wrote on Oct 22, 2008 7:49 AM:

    " Do the people of Alaska really want this woman running their state??? I open the paper and every week it is something new. Think about it, she has no idea what the Vice Presidents role is. And by the way she runs Alaska she has no Idea how to run your state. She thinks she can do whatever she wants because she is the Gov. And she pretty much said the same thing for being a Vice President. She wants to change the role that has been in place or over two hundred years. Keep her in Alaska!! "

    jp to max katt wrote on Oct 22, 2008 7:34 AM:

    " max, i think it means the same thing, i'm amazed they let it fly as well, but sometimes you just have to try to sneak one past.
    about sarahs travel; she takes her kids with her, the dems get angry, she leaves them at home, the dems get angry, and spout "she has a special needs baby""she needs to be with them children"
    who is paying for Obama to go visit his grandmother? "

    MAXKATT from NY wrote on Oct 22, 2008 6:11 AM:

    " jp...LOL. Just curious, does "smokin the pole" have a different meaning up there? I'm also surprised the editors let "scumbag" fly. Per conventional wisdom and wiki it = used condom. This board wouldn't let me use the alternative word for flatulence the other day! "

    MAXKATT from NY wrote on Oct 22, 2008 6:06 AM:

    " If not witness tampering, how about a look into all the travel expenses for her kids she's been sticking your state with. I understand the state doesn't have an official policy on it, but some of the trips seemed more like joy junkets, and it's curious she went back to amend the filings as "official business." Smells like a rotting grayling to me. "

    Alaskan wrote on Oct 22, 2008 1:13 AM:

    " This has been nothing more than a witch hunt from the start. Sarah Palin has done more for this state than most. If by some chance she and John McCain don't win, she will be back and she won't forget all this trash that has been said about her. Les Gara get over yourself and realize that you will never be anything more than you are right now, which isn't much. Your jealously will gain you nothing. Have you ever heard that you have the right to address your accusers?? "

    J.C. Cochran wrote on Oct 21, 2008 10:27 PM:

    " The VP campaign pick has one duty: support the agenda of the person at the top of the ticket. Sarah Palin has given several interviews in which she brazenly offers her own agenda, proving once again that Sarah Palin's only agenda is Sarah Palin. Good people of Alaska, take an in-depth look at this woman: she will say anything, do anything and screw anyone as long as it benefits Sarah Palin. Impeach her! "

    jp wrote on Oct 21, 2008 7:58 PM:

    " les gara is a scumbag! always has been, always will be.
    Mr. yesman to mark garbage,
    who is in the pocket of who?
    talk about smokin the pole! les is the guy!!! "

    Dave in Alaska wrote on Oct 21, 2008 7:21 PM:

    " Palin has my support. Gara get a life. "

    elevator man wrote on Oct 21, 2008 5:56 PM:

    " palvin does not even know what a vps job even is just dumb "

    SUNSHINE GUY wrote on Oct 21, 2008 5:00 PM:

    " McCain is ruing the day he ever heard the name Palin. What a megalomaniacal individual. If you folks don't rein her in and send her home to Wasilla to become a "hockey mom" again and raise her children. Obviously she did not do much raising while she was busy trying to become a political somebody. If I were an Alaskan I would be calling for impeachment proceedings. That woman has her own agenda and only cares about herself. I feel for her children. She ought to sign them over to the state and her and 1st dude can be alone. "

    MAXKATT from NY wrote on Oct 21, 2008 4:33 PM:

    " Seems like a slam dunk case to me. The whole Palin clan was anxious to deal with this and put it behind them until slightly after the veep pick. Suddenly key players are then ignoring subpoenas and trying to delay the process past 11/4. I'd be surprised if the sudden change in gears wouldn't be defined as tampering. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   








Classifieds




Make Us Your Homepage