Rail expansion chugs along

By Andrew Wellner
Frontiersman
Published on Thursday, October 23, 2008 8:27 PM AKDT

PALMER — The Mat-Su Borough has accepted $17.5 million in state money to work on a portion of a proposed rail extension to Port MacKenzie.

The grant, from the state Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development, will go toward building a rail embankment traveling in a loop near the Borough’s port facilities, Borough Manager John Duffy said.

The loop will sit on land inside the Borough’s designated port district and is outside the scope of an environmental impact statement required for the rest of the rail line. The project is a joint effort between the Borough and the Alaska Railroad.

Overall, the rail line is expected to cost $300 million in federal bonds and will connect the railroad’s main line, running north in roughly the same direction as the Parks Highway. The project includes a number of potential routes, with linkages to the railroad’s main line at different points between Meadow Lakes and a point north of Willow.

In essence, the Borough hopes the extension will allow for freight to move from ships at the port directly onto rail cars, allowing customers to benefit from savings by using trains instead of trucks. In theory, having a port that far up the railroad’s route could shorten overland routes for customers requiring material shipped in by sea to points north of Port MacKenzie.

The rail line could, the Borough believes, put Port MacKenzie in competition with Alaska ports such as Seward and Valdez.

The portion funded through the grant accepted this week will be a 3-mile loop at the end of the line allowing railcars to run up to the dock.

Tuesday, Duffy said the embankment will be built first. Later in the project rails will be installed atop it. In the meantime, the embankment will serve as a road to service port operations.

The money, according to the ordinance passed by the Borough assembly, would go toward finalizing an environmental review, preparation of bid documents, acquiring rights-of-way and design and construction contracts.

But before any loop can be built contractors will have to tame the landscape, Duffy said.

“There’s a huge ridge down there that needs to be dealt with,” he said.

Assembly discussion of accepting the money was, as is the case with most ordinance excepting grants, decidedly brief with a few questions asked about rights-of-way and area roads.

“We’re spending the state’s money on this?” asked Assemblyman Tom Kluberton.

“Yes,” Duffy replied.

“Perfect,” Kluberton said.

Contact Andrew Wellner at andrew.wellner@frontiersman.com or 352-2270.

Comments

5 comment(s)

    Concerned resident wrote on Oct 27, 2008 5:23 AM:

    " I am not in favor of a bridge unless the environmental impact was minimal.

    To transform Point McKenzie into a port similar to Valdez would make the area vulnerable to the same kind of environmental catastrophe as happened in Valdez not so very long ago.

    A commuter railway between Anchorage and Palmer would be of more advantage than a bridge, and it would carry far less risk. I would prefer to see this commuter railway built asap, and to leave these other plans for another day. "

    Don and Teds Big Adventures wrote on Oct 24, 2008 2:43 PM:

    " Don Young and Ted Stevens have always seen the big picture with Mat-Su and the need to tie it together into one big Anchorage Bowl. The port, ferry, bridge and the Rail line will tie everything into a large South Central hub. Years later people will talk about the days that you had to drive 1.5 hours to get across the 2 mile section of the inlet. The deep water port with rail will carry South central for the next 100 years. Lets hope that they both live to be 99 years old. "

    Valley Kid wrote on Oct 24, 2008 11:31 AM:

    " Valley Guy is right. I'm looking forward to a bridge across the Little-Su. It will open lots of hunting and fishing in that area. I can't wait to get a nice 5 acre lot in the Fish Creek area. "

    jp wrote on Oct 24, 2008 6:10 AM:

    " i agree with valley guy, that is the only reasonable route.
    so which one did they choose?
    knowing the "allmighty John Duffy" i bet it will be the route that will displace the most people, be the most expensive, and have the most impact on the environment.
    if that doesn't happen , i will be surprised. "

    Valley Guy wrote on Oct 23, 2008 10:55 PM:

    " There is only one logical route, that effects the least amount of people and habitat, and that is the Fish Creek/Red Shirt ridge route. The others cut through the heart of development and wetlands. I wish they would just do it, instead of studying it to death like the bridge across the inlet. I've been around here
    50 +years and I doubt if I will ever see either project done. Too many players, too many opinions. Just dooooo it...Logically "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Classifieds




Make Us Your Homepage