Both fliers, sent by the Committee to Elect David Cheezem, Gatto’s Democratic opponent, cite donations from embattled oil services company VECO and what the committee calls Gatto’s inaction on health care as reasons he should not be re-elected.
“Between 2002 and 2006, Carl Gatto received $10,700 in campaign contributions from VECO and its executives,” one flier says.
|
|
VECO, which was bought by CH2M Hill in September 2007, has become synonymous with corruption in the Alaska Legislature after its former CEO, Bill Allen, became a central figure in a federal investigation into corrupt Alaska politics.
The most famous Valley legislator to be branded with VECO corruption is former Rep. Vic Kohring who is serving a three and a half year sentence in federal prison for accepting bribes from Allen.
On Wednesday, Gatto said the donations from VECO held no sway over his vote.
“The only thing that sways my vote is what benefits my community,” he said.
Furthermore, Gatto said proof he did nothing to assist VECO, because of campaign contributions, came when he told Allen he would not support Pete Kott in a political bid. Kott was found guilty of corruption and is serving time in federal prison.
“What he’s (Cheezem) not saying is the last donation I got was in 2005 and that’s when I told Bill Allen I would not support Pete Kott and that’s the last donation I got,” Gatto said.
He added Cheezem has received more than $10,000 from various unions in the state, showing Cheezem is already receiving money from special interests.
A check of the Alaska Public Offices Commission Web site confirms more than $10,000 of campaign donations from unions.
“I got money back in ‘05 and he’s bringing that up in 08?” Gatto said. “And he just took special interest money.”
For his part, Cheezem said he’s proud of his campaign contributions.
“It’s not about the sources of contributions,” Cheezem said. “It’s about what you do with it.”
The flier also accuses Gatto of not standing up to special interests, which Gatto said is untrue.
“I’ve already done what he accuses me of not doing,” Gatto said, referring to when he told Allen he would not support Kott, as Allen wanted him to.
But Cheezem said he doesn’t want the whole campaign to be about who gets what contributions, but about integrity.
He said he thinks Gatto should have publicly proclaimed that being swayed in voting by certain donations isn’t right.
Cheezem and local Democrats also attack Gatto over health care issues, saying he “doesn’t get it” in on a flier.
A statement from Gatto during a recent candidate forum runs across the top of the flier, and was an answer to a question about providing health care to everyone.
“My understanding from hospitals and reading the signs on the wall is that no one, no one can be refused health care,” the quote reads.
On Wednesday, Gatto clarified his comment by saying no one is dying in the street, and hospitals cannot deny a patient care regardless of their health insurance situation.
Cheezem’s health care plan would involve letting small businesses, like Fireside Books, the bookstore he owns in Palmer, bargain together for the lowest group rates.
Gatto said he also has a plan that would make clinics a triage area before granting patients some sort of coupon for health care elsewhere.
He didn’t go into details about the legislation.
As the days until Nov. 4 continue to dwindle, the race between Gatto and Cheezem appears to have become the hottest in the Valley. Local Democrats seem to be spending more time and money on that race than any other.
Voters will get their chance to decide who should represent District 13, along with other districts in the Valley, from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. on Election Day.
Contact Michael Rovito at michael.rovito@frontiersman.com or 352-2252.


Comments
37 comment(s)Doh wrote on Nov 7, 2008 5:43 PM:
How idiotic was this statement?! It's exactly what drives the cost up for eveyone else! "
Just Curious wrote on Nov 6, 2008 9:10 AM:
Is it because there were other companies competeing for the same contract and the only way to ward the competition off was through bribes? Once they were given the contract why would it be nessasary to continue bribing your legislators?
! hope somebody has the time and energy to answer this question for me as it is really nagging "
To all the mean spirited nasty democrats wrote on Nov 6, 2008 5:45 AM:
Scoreboard. Your negative attacks were soundly rejected.
I hope he remembers your ugly attacks. "
Independent Alaskan wrote on Nov 3, 2008 1:21 PM:
Go David Go wrote on Nov 2, 2008 4:12 PM:
Sorry David Cheezam wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:48 AM:
It must be drive you crazy to know that a liberal has no chance. But take heart you do have the great one running for President "
Mr. Gatto wrote on Nov 1, 2008 8:24 PM:
Union Money wrote on Nov 1, 2008 4:04 PM:
Gatto Ineffective pt 3 wrote on Nov 1, 2008 2:54 PM:
Gatto Ineffective pt 2 wrote on Nov 1, 2008 2:51 PM:
Gatto Ineffective wrote on Nov 1, 2008 2:47 PM:
TTOSBT wrote on Nov 1, 2008 8:22 AM:
David Cheezem is articulate and thinks through issues. He will make a terrific representative for this district. We need representation that is not pre-determined by corporate interests or directed from the balcony of the legislature. "
Walter T Franks on the PPT wrote on Nov 1, 2008 7:18 AM:
NUMBER 1 No corporation in the history of the world has ever paid taxes. Period end of discussion
But wait Walt, yes they do. Their IRS filings show that they do. (I will continue to type slowly so that I will not confuse you) When a corporation pays the tax that governments levy, they simply raise the price of their goods to cover the tax. The consumers of those goods then pay for the tax for that corporation.
WTF "
WellRead wrote on Nov 1, 2008 12:29 AM:
To RoadWarrior wrote on Oct 31, 2008 6:37 PM:
Also to set the record straight, neither HB 320 nor HB 314 passed, and the final bill passed, based on SB 200, was substantially different that the house bills Gatto signed on to. My question is, if Gatto fought for HB320 and HB314, why didn't he at least sign on to SB200? "
RoadWarrior wrote on Oct 31, 2008 6:06 PM:
In 2006 he also sponsored HB 320 and co-sponsored HB 314, both of which dealt with the use of deadly force in "defense of self, other persons and property." "
Re Castle Bill wrote on Oct 31, 2008 1:27 PM:
To Gatto Mailer wrote on Oct 31, 2008 12:59 PM:
To REELECT wrote on Oct 31, 2008 12:23 PM:
And you do know that Nancy Pelosi is in the US HOUSE, not the Senate, right? "
To Firefighter wrote on Oct 31, 2008 12:07 PM:
Anyway, PPT did NOT prevent the oil industry from "soaking" the public. Unless by "soaking" the public you mean soaking them in additional revenue. PPT, while it did close some loopholes that needed closing, set the tax rate significantly lower than the revision brought on by ACES. And ACES was a direct response to VECO bribing our legislators during the PPT debate.
Spin it however you like CARL, but PPT hurt Alaskans and would have been terrible for the economy if it hadn't been for Sarah Palin demanding reform. "
Absolutely RIght wrote on Oct 31, 2008 11:50 AM:
More important, people knew that VECO was buying votes on the house floor, and he didn't stand up publicly. THAT"s the take home message. There was a HUGE problem, and Carl didn't do a thing to stop it or bring it to the world's attention. "
greg kgb wrote on Oct 31, 2008 11:26 AM:
n feel good ads talking about the great job they're doing. Lets vote to MOVE THE CAPITOL NORTH into TRUE public view where we can look into their eyes, not through the liberal medias filtered lens. "
Gatto Mailer wrote on Oct 31, 2008 11:23 AM:
REELECT wrote on Oct 31, 2008 11:14 AM:
Egregious errors alone by the US Attorney in attempting to prosecute are at grounds for a new trial. The Judge's errors in not declaring a mistrial several times will result in his eventual acquittal on appeal.
Senator Stevens had better get REELECTED.
If he isn’t, guappo Pelosi gets herself a lapdog who doesn't know where the bathrooms are in the Senate and Alaska WILL BECOME A PRESERVATIONIST STATE. Kiss off the gas pipeline, offshore drilling, and 100,000 jobs just for starters. "
ValleyVoter wrote on Oct 31, 2008 10:42 AM:
Firefighter wrote on Oct 31, 2008 10:34 AM:
brvak wrote on Oct 31, 2008 9:55 AM:
No worries... wrote on Oct 31, 2008 9:38 AM:
Why is it... wrote on Oct 31, 2008 9:26 AM:
PACs wrote on Oct 31, 2008 9:12 AM:
FACTS wrote on Oct 31, 2008 8:57 AM:
FACT - Carl Voted FOR PPT, which gave the oil industry billions of dollars in tax giveaways.
FACT - Gatto knew what influence VECO was pushing in the House and Senate. Gatto did nothing to stop it. "
Of Course wrote on Oct 31, 2008 8:50 AM:
I love it wrote on Oct 31, 2008 8:39 AM:
Mailer wrote on Oct 31, 2008 8:26 AM:
Oh Really wrote on Oct 31, 2008 8:21 AM:
RoadWarrior wrote on Oct 31, 2008 7:29 AM:
Cheezem is cheesy wrote on Oct 31, 2008 6:41 AM: