Bible gives clues to true timeline for Christ’s birth

By Ron Hamman
Religion Views
Published on Tuesday, December 2, 2008 1:21 PM AKST

With the passage of Black Friday, America enters that portal of time that culminates Dec. 25, otherwise known as Christmas Day.

Since the later part of the 19th century this day has been celebrated without controversy, but in recent years opposition has grown from those groups harboring animosity toward Christianity, so much so that not only do we have various new competing holidays springing up, but there is an effort to remove the word “Christmas” from these holidays altogether in order to avoid offending non-Christian religious groups.

From the perspective of the Christian community, this move is a grievous offense and is seen as yet another indicator of an increasingly hostile, Christ-rejecting society: “How dare they try and take away the day of our Lord’s birth!”

But is this so? Was Christ really born on Dec. 25?

To begin with, we need to understand that there is no reference in the Bible indicating Jesus was born on Dec. 25, or any other specific day for that matter. My own conclusion as to why God might have left out this detail is that man tends to worship the wrong thing. Take our modern society for example. We tend to worship the getting of gifts more than the Savior.

Secondly, in terms of significance, when he was born is not nearly so important as how he was born — the virgin birth. And as to further prove my point above, even this has been misconstrued through the years either to glorify women in general or to deify one in particular, robbing God of his glory. But the plain truth is that without a virgin birth, Jesus Christ is just a man no different than anyone.

Thirdly, what we do know about the origins of Christmas is that they are pagan in origin, dating back to perhaps 4,000 years ago to man’s earliest efforts in establishing idolatry. That many of the rituals associated with the winter solstice bare a striking resemblance to God’s promised Christ is perhaps why it was eventually Christianized. Christmas is a contraction for the Christ Mass. However, idolatry is sin, which is no doubt why it never entered into the minds of the early New Testament churches either to concern themselves with Dec. 25 or Jesus’ birthday.

With this said, it is now time to examine what the Bible does say about when Jesus was born. For this, the Bible does give us two clues as to a time period for his birth, and this is in the September to October time frame.

The first passage given to us is Luke 2:8: “And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night.”

For those familiar with this passage, Jesus was birthed into this world immediately preceding this verse, while the angels announce that birth in those that follow. What this tells us about the timing of the birth is that it was sometime before the end of October since this is when the shepherds brought their flocks in from the fields due to the cold of the approaching winter. This practice apparently still goes on today. Thus, Dec. 25 could not have been the date.

The second passage is found, oddly enough, in the book of Revelation. In chapter 12 we have the following account: “And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered. ...And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations. ...”

There are no doubt those who will take issue with me, but the more I study the book of Revelation, the clearer many things become. And while I didn’t approach this passage with the intent of discovering the date of Christ’s birth, in my resultant study of it this is exactly what I found.

Proper biblical interpretation readily lends itself to two things concerning this passage, the first being that this man child is none other than Jesus Christ. It can be none other. And what is more, whatever it is saying, it is in direct correlation to his birth.

Secondly, there just happen to be two “wonders” in heaven we call constellations that correspond to the woman and dragon here in this passage; these are known as Virgo, the Virgin, and Hydra. These just happen to be in close proximity to each other as the passage here indicates — Hydra underneath Virgo, ready to devour the man child.

However, the real find as concerning the timing of Christ’s birth is in relation to the sun clothing this woman. Though I cannot even be called an amateur astronomer, the information out there is that our sun passes through Virgo from the middle of September to the end of October. This, I believe, is biblical confirmation that Jesus was born in the fall, not winter.

Perhaps all the antagonism surrounding Christmas, then, is more from the hand of God than anyone else. Food for thought, but perhaps it is high time that, at the very least, Christianity gets back to the worship of the Savior rather than that of their material treasures. It could begin in Wasilla.

Ron Hamman is pastor for Independent Baptist Church of Wasilla. Contact him at

357-4229.

Comments

7 comment(s)

    Mainespring wrote on Dec 13, 2008 5:28 AM:

    " The part of your commentary that most resonated with me was this: " man tends to worship the wrong thing." We Christians also often worship the 'wrong' thing. So much energy and attention spent on parsing out and interpreting Revelation symbols and fretting about future 'certainties.' Too little energy spent in promoting and celebrating the actual words and lessons and actions that Jesus himself performed. Focus on the present, and the timeless gift that has been given us, otherwise this will be wasted. The future is in God's hands and understanding, not ours. "

    JustMe Again - MA wrote on Dec 11, 2008 12:24 PM:

    " the winter months have usually been too cold for agricultural endeavors and many other industries that were present at that time. Combine that with shorter daylight hours during winter being responsible for higher rates of depression and suicide, what better time to have a religious celebration bring family together (many who do see much of eachother the rest of the year) and in celebrating the BIRTH of our Lord at a time too many consider death. That is why most sacred holidays are during the cold winter months, and not just in Christianity "

    JustMe - MA wrote on Dec 11, 2008 12:17 PM:

    " "In the third century, efforts were made to find out the date of the Nativity, but only in the year 336 was the date of the December 25 festival set in commemoration of Jesus' birth. Pope Julius formally selected December 25 as the day of Christmas in 349 A.D." as quoted from http://www.calendar-updates.com/info/holidays/us/christmas.aspx . As a Catholic raised in the Church and through parochial schools, I had religion class EVERY DAY. I have known since childhood Jesus was not born on 12/25 - Dec was chosen so that families could gather during the wintertime "

    Well said wrote on Dec 4, 2008 8:01 AM:

    " firstly...either comment on the author's work or don't leave a comment. While the frontiersman should have spell checked, this still is not grammar class.

    I am not religious, especially in terms of Christianity, but I commend you on the mention of the solstice. The final "death" of the sun for 3 days and the "rising" after solstice most definitely represents a common visual that religious leaders the world over have used to a signify deities.

    The materialism and waste of modern commercial Christmas sickens me. Thanks for an insightful read. "

    Mike Stone wrote on Dec 2, 2008 10:39 AM:

    " Also the Title of the Article is spelled incorrectly.
    "ture" or "true" "

    Mike Stone wrote on Dec 2, 2008 10:36 AM:

    " WOW... A Christian looking to the Stars to find answers to biblical questions. That sounds like astrology, not astronomy. You made the statement that, "the more I study the book of Revelation, the clearer many things become." This is incredible to me as while I was going to The Masters College where I studied Revelations, every teacher I had on the subject told me the same thing, that the more they read Revelations the less they understand. I guess you are special in God's sight... "

    Perspective wrote on Dec 2, 2008 6:39 AM:

    " Pastor Ron...
    (abiding)
    This means permanant or long lasting, not that they were "brought in from the field"

    The first passage given to us is Luke 2:8: “And there were in the same country shepherds ABIDING in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night.”



    Also it depends where you are in the world as to where the stars and constilations are and how they are viewed. Time also changes their location and visibility...

    Perhaps it was spring or summer?

    Food for thought. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Classifieds




Make Us Your Homepage