A national survey conducted by oil industry analyst Trilby Lundberg released Sunday shows the price of regular unleaded gasoline has dropped 22 cents a gallon over the past two weeks. The national average price of $1.75 a gallon is the lowest since March 2004. This is good news for those in the Lower 48 looking to stretch their dollars during this latest recession.
It’s also still a mystery exactly why Alaska — a state that produces considerable amounts of domestic oil and has oil refining capabilities — continues to have the highest prices at the pump in the nation. AAA reports that in Wasilla, the average price of regular unleaded, while down from summer highs well over $4, is still $2.59 a gallon, more than 80 cents over the national average.
|
|
Geographically, Alaska is far removed from the Lower 48 and it would be unrealistic to expect we would always pay less than the rest of the nation. That said, we deserve better when filling up.
That Alaska pays the highest per gallon for gasoline in the United States is embarrassing. The same would be true if residents of Idaho paid substantially more for potatoes or Washington residents paid more than anyone else for apples.
During a campaign visit to the Frontiersman prior to the Nov. 4 election, Mark Begich said he’s as frustrated as anyone over Alaska’s gas prices. Over the past 18 months, our prices rose faster and more steeply than the rest of the nation, and now are falling at a snail’s pace compared to the Lower 48, a phenomenon Begich said deserves attention from our state’s national delegation.
We agree. Now that he’s set to be our next U.S. senator, having upset incumbent Sen. Ted Stevens, Begich has an opportunity to make good on this pledge.
What has changed over the last 18 months to warrant this drastic turnaround in our local energy market? If the state’s refineries cannot turn a profit, how can this be remedied? Do we need to take measures to ensure more of our own oil is being refined and distributed here at home? Do we need more refining capacity or more production from the North Slope, and if so, how can we make this happen?
That we pay more for gasoline than anyone else in the nation is a symptom. We hold Begich to his promise to seek a diagnosis.

Comments
78 comment(s)John wrote on Dec 23, 2008 11:33 AM:
And if local yokels have a problem with "outsiders" opining, they need to talk to the newspaper's editors about changing the "rules". Until then, Ed and other "outsiders" haven't done one thing wrong by blogging here--the locals need to develop a spine, that's all.
These abusive people are everything Americans perceived Sara Palin to be--and didn't vote for her--because of those perceptions.
There are blogs elsewhere, Ed, where people behave better than this. "
Nostalgia wrote on Dec 23, 2008 6:48 AM:
To Ed from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 9:30 PM:
'I woud like to have Sarah supporters answer questions, therefore I am here until soeone does.'
Hey Ed..what does 'woud' and 'soeone' mean, Mr. Brain? And there must be a hundred ways your dumb, boring questions have been proven wrong. Now it's just old. You are too dumb to understand or listen. That's why nobody is responding to you anymore except to make fun of you. Who wants to lower themselves to the level of an idiot? "
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 6:21 PM:
" After reading all of the comments here, I'm wondering why anyone is giving this fool Troll from AZ any response at all. Ignore him, and the troll will crawl back under his bridge. "
Dear Mad Dog, Should you like to answer any of my previous questions, I would be quite happy. Or is it the Palin supporters do not have an answer?
Easier to smear and hide from fact, huh. "
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 6:18 PM:
" Um, Edward from AZ, why is it you spend so much time on the Frontiersman paper, home to about 4000 paper subscribers? Just curious.
Thanks "
I woud like to have Sarah supporters answer questions, therefore I am here until soeone does. "
The Real Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 6:17 PM:
:
" I get bored sitting down here Arizona because nobody here listens to me. They've all realized I'm not very bright and I like to blame other people for my own short-comings. But I think I'm smart, and even if you all prove to me how dim I am it doesn't matter. I can't hear you ...........! "
Sad one of you idiots must use my name in defense of your failure to respectfully answer questions.
Guess it shows your intelligence level.
You protect Sarah why? "
Saltboy wrote on Dec 22, 2008 4:11 PM:
Thanks "
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 3:46 PM:
akchris64 wrote on Dec 22, 2008 3:22 PM:
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 1:57 PM:
" We pay the highest price for fuel because we are OWNED by ConocoPhillips, Exxon and BP Arco. They rape us at the pumps because they care so much about us Alaskans...NOT!! Gov Palin is the first Gov willing to stand up to these domestic terrorists. You go Girl! "
How is it that they own you? If in fact they are out to gouge, maybe it is pay back for the higher taxes your girl has put in "
Mad Dog wrote on Dec 22, 2008 1:19 PM:
Nostalgia wrote on Dec 22, 2008 8:35 AM:
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 7:58 AM:
" yeah spankles, he's worse than i am!!!
worthy of noting;
there are a whole lot more trailer parks in Arizona than here!.........!
turbo tax makes everyone feel like a pro!
hahahahaha "
Sorry pal, I spent many years even prior to software where ya had to know the law not just fill in spaces. So you and Spankies please explain why Sarah fails to report the per diems, and personal expense funds and offset them on her "1040"PS thats the fed return "
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 7:55 AM:
" Poor Ed... you're a professional tax 'accdountant' huh? What exactly is that? I know what an accountant is, but I've never heard of an 'accdountant'. Say, do your clients know that the person doing thier taxes has such a difficult time with spelling and grammar? Or by professional tax 'accdountant' do you mean that you once did your own taxes? Sorry bud...I'm not buying that you're a professional .....................?
Are you related to Sarah? You rant but have no clue, go watch out your window, watch Russia "
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 7:52 AM:
" Racers that are in it to make money are in it for profit , hello, pro- racers run their operations as a business, again, get a clue.. you can have a profit, or yo can have a loss, works both ways.. "
Better reasd up on the IRS code, esp Sec 183 "
jp wrote on Dec 22, 2008 6:36 AM:
worthy of noting;
there are a whole lot more trailer parks in Arizona than here!
the odds are good that "to spankles" has hit the nail on the head!
turbo tax makes everyone feel like a pro!
hahahahaha "
To Spankles wrote on Dec 20, 2008 2:57 AM:
Spankles wrote on Dec 20, 2008 12:22 AM:
Poor Ed wrote on Dec 19, 2008 7:54 PM:
Hey eddy you forgot to buy a clue wrote on Dec 19, 2008 5:36 PM:
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 19, 2008 3:30 PM:
" No, little Ed, I'm not 'afraid' of listing a boring list of all the different ways an adult man can use his own brain to find things out for himself. And I won't be goaded into it just because you gave the expected and predictable response of 'they must not exist'. I .................."
In response, I am a professional tax accdountant and have listed the IRS Code which rules. Since you have not indicated where I am wrong, we know that you are. "
Poor Ed wrote on Dec 18, 2008 7:23 PM:
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 18, 2008 4:52 PM:
Section 183(c) defines "activity not engaged in for profit" to be any activity other than those that would have expenses allowed as a "trade or business" (§ 162) or "investment" (§ 212).
There is presumption the activity is "for profit" created in § 183(d) by "three out of five year" rule. Gross income from the activity must exceed deductions from the activity in three of the previous five years. If it does then the activity is likely presumed to be an activity engaged in for profit. The taxpayer must show a "
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 18, 2008 4:44 PM:
" My 'siurce'(?) I guess you mean 'source'? That would be my eyes. Because I read. The local papers. 2 out-of-state papers. National news (AP, etc.) I love you people that can't find things for yourself and then ask everybody else to cite thier sources like a bibiliography in order to 'prove' it to you. Pull your head out and go look it up yourself............? "
Well, since you choose to not show sources, I guess you are afraid to admit they do not exist. "
Poor Ed wrote on Dec 18, 2008 3:12 PM:
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 18, 2008 2:26 PM:
" You're funny! Hey, Ed! Hate to be the one to break it you buddy...but those issues have ALREADY been addressed and found to be FALSE! HA HA
My friend, none of these issues have been resolved. The per diems , tax returns, clothing, etc are still valid questions. In youtr mind if they have been proven to be false, please show your siurce of information.
Thank you. "
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 18, 2008 2:23 PM:
" Gee...I guess somebody should let all those guys at NASCAR know that they need to get a job and quit wasting thier time with that silly multi-billion dollar hobby! LOL! What an idiot! "
Your post proves your are un-informed. A hobby is one which you are not in it to necessarily make a profit , to be considered a business, you need to have a profit in 3 of the past 5 years, including the current years return.
Nascar people do it year round, Todd not "
Ed...what a smart guy wrote on Dec 18, 2008 11:39 AM:
Hey Eddy by vowel get a clue wrote on Dec 18, 2008 8:10 AM:
Poor Mr. Ed wrote on Dec 17, 2008 3:08 PM:
jp wrote on Dec 17, 2008 12:24 PM:
i figure it this way: all he has to do as president is put everyone on welfare, socialized medicine, free government bailouts for overspending, and we're all sitting in high cotton!
i have seen the light! where do i sign up? "
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 17, 2008 7:59 AM:
" What 'question'? All we see is endless, hollow tripe from you. 'Accusations' that are just the same, tired, re-hashed and false smears
Smears, are you serious. OK here goes:
Per diem reports for working from home can not be supported by Alaskan law;
Fraudulent expense reports for personal family travel, which were altered after the fact;
Gifts recieved ;
none of these items reported on tax returns. Then the Hobby, for which expenses deducted beyond allowable amounts.
Answers please if you understand "
Lee wrote on Dec 17, 2008 7:52 AM:
Poor Mr. Ed wrote on Dec 16, 2008 11:39 PM:
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 16, 2008 6:01 PM:
" So let me get this straight; you're oozing in here day after day asking why some Alaskans support thier governor? Why? You're not really 'asking', Asking means you're open to an answer. You're here to bash. You don't live here. You have no clue about half of what you talk about. So by your example I should be busy bothering people across the US as to why they support zero-experience, socialist Obama? Why? It's over. The man won and that's that
So then humor me with an answer "
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 16, 2008 3:55 PM:
The Real Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 16, 2008 3:52 PM:
Just likeher campaign, spout whatever but do not face facts. Geesh, can't even remember what she reads. She is not qualifed to be a dog catcher, the dogs are smarter. "
Dear Mr. Ed wrote on Dec 16, 2008 3:35 PM:
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 16, 2008 2:33 PM:
Spankles wrote on Dec 16, 2008 2:28 PM:
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 16, 2008 10:54 AM:
" The election is over. why are all these lower48 losers still posting comments? I don't care about thier opinion. "
Dear Spankles,
We are not posting comments, just asking for our logical questions to be answered by Palin supporters without deferring to a different topic.
It appears that since there are no answers fortcoming you are at a loss for words. Does the tryth hurt? "
jp wrote on Dec 16, 2008 7:40 AM:
did we miraculously get a whole "S" load of "extra" oil all of a sudden?
NO!
our oil prices are controlled by the stock market, and nothing else.
everyone said we had a shortage, that was a trumped up farce created by stock market, and i'm certain there were lots of people who profited heavily.
as for our state, i agree with Lud and simply, for every action comes an equal and opposite reaction.
Mr. larson has been here for what seems to be an eternity, and is a shrewd businessman "
Lud Larson wrote on Dec 16, 2008 5:00 AM:
Spankles wrote on Dec 16, 2008 2:26 AM:
Mr. Ed and the Boston Baked Bean wrote on Dec 15, 2008 3:18 PM:
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 15, 2008 12:24 PM:
So you see I do know something about the matter. You might want to do some research with the IRS on this matter. Publication 17 is a starting point. "
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 15, 2008 12:19 PM:
Guess you have problems answering questions huh? So you decide much like her "Crookedness" to attack attack attack.
Seems to me you should sit down with pencil and paper and try to respond in a manner that is educational for yourself and othes. "
Jim from Boston wrote on Dec 15, 2008 11:39 AM:
Well, since the Fed will drop the funds rate near zero Wednesday, that will take monetary policy out of the picture.
So what do you have left? Fiscal policy. Government investment in growth. Things like high speed rail, education ... or you can go the Japanese route and take a decade of stagnation as they did when they had this problem.
Sensible regulation should also be reinstated. "
To the Arizona Wonder wrote on Dec 15, 2008 9:24 AM:
Rex in Wasilla wrote on Dec 15, 2008 4:02 AM:
It must be gratifying for you to try to get a rise out of folks you never met! SOoo.. Eddie, pleeze, go rant and rave in your local rag. If they accept your maddness "
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 14, 2008 6:43 PM:
Obviously reading is not your strong point. I said "getting paid for something".
And it is a hobby by tax law, another area you are not familar with. Per diem expenses again by tax law need to be netted on the tax return, so please respond when your knowledge base is improved.
And lastly my comments were not about your politics, but federal tax law.
Curious is there something in the air there that harms the level of intelligence, you almost sound like Sarah..... "
2 Bushes make a wrong wrote on Dec 14, 2008 6:04 PM:
To Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 14, 2008 4:14 PM:
I agree wrote on Dec 14, 2008 4:08 PM:
Jo wrote on Dec 14, 2008 1:43 PM:
You say we need Governor Sarah Palin in the Whitehouse - well - when George W was governor of Texas everybody said he needed to be in the Whitehouse. They got their wish and boy have we paid dearly for it.
Be very, very careful what you wish for. "
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 14, 2008 1:37 PM:
Regardless, lets have your answer regarding the failure to report the per diem and other expense payments recieved on the tax returns. Now we cn't say we forgot, ands if we do, I would have to question the competence of this politician.
So dio tell. "
Poor Ed tisk tisk wrote on Dec 14, 2008 7:14 AM:
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 12, 2008 7:32 PM:
Youbring new meaning to ignorant.
Guess your head is so deeply buried in the sand you hsve a difficult time finding reality.
So sorry for you. "
Ben C wrote on Dec 12, 2008 7:13 PM:
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 12, 2008 5:36 PM:
Your tax structure bothers me not. Your stealing horse bleep and her ways bother me. To think she could have been a heartbeat from the Presidency is still a frightening thought.
And what ya gonna do when the oil taxes drop and your sweet Sarah can't balance her budget. Remember her mark in Wasilla. What was it from a 20 million drop to a budget deficit?
But my main problem is her theivery, and cheating. And this should worry all her constituents. "
Rex in Wasilla wrote on Dec 12, 2008 5:12 PM:
To Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 12, 2008 3:25 PM:
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 12, 2008 3:18 PM:
If you believe Sarah is effective, you must be blind.
Exactly what is she effective at??
Certainly not doing interviews. Certainly not addressing crowds discussing her politics, other than mud-slinging.
About the only effective things she does is accept free clothes, free trips, and fraudulent expense re-imbursements from Alaska. Or to use another word, she is effective at stealing other peoples $$$$$$$$$$$.
Then she files fraudulent tax returns using H & R Block effectively failing to give them the necessary info.
I'm so impressed (not) with Sarah. "
Patrick S - Richmond VA wrote on Dec 12, 2008 11:53 AM:
You folks in Alaska can thank your lucky stars that you have the great Sarah Palin as your governor. She is exactly what we need in the White House!
Long live Sarah Palin! "
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 12, 2008 10:58 AM:
I am not lying, and you know it. Try reading IRS tax code. You can not deduct expenses greater than income for hobbies, and Todd's snow mobile racing is just a hobby.
Expenses paid by Alaska are to be matched against the actual expenses ncurred to determine which is higher. If actual expenses are higher then you can deduct the excess, if the monies recieved by arah are greater, then the excess is income. She has strangely failed to make this part of her returns.
Oh well., guess the oil check blinds you. "
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 12, 2008 10:53 AM:
Please pull your heads out of your oil wells. Sarah has made fools of you. Guess reality is not something you see or believe in. Look at her actions, answer the questions I have asked. See the REALITY of the facts:
Fraudulent per diems, fraudulent expense reports, personal expenses charged to Alaskans, freebies not reported, which add up to fraudulent tax returns based upon returns for 2007 she has released.
And now you pay such a high amount for gas, as I enjoy $ 1.62 per gallon, with state taxes added. "
Rex in Wasilla wrote on Dec 11, 2008 5:19 PM:
Do you not have a life that you have to spend so much effort spewing your venomous lies in OUR paper? Sinnce you know so much about ALASKA laws, maybe you could state the statutes, laws, codes, that you state Palin violated, and what evidence you use to prove the alleged violation. If none that SHUT YOUR LYING MOUTH! "
To what a clown wrote on Dec 11, 2008 4:55 PM:
What a clown wrote on Dec 11, 2008 3:07 PM:
Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 11, 2008 2:47 PM:
The oil companies are passing along the high taxes that your governor helped assess to enable her to issue you those wonderful annual checks. So it sit back and then contact her Highness and ask for relief. Your gift check is now biting you in the butt.
You betcha, wink wink. "
Guru wrote on Dec 11, 2008 11:56 AM:
To Jim from Boston wrote on Dec 10, 2008 12:23 PM:
Blathering Democrat wrote on Dec 10, 2008 11:39 AM:
John Harkey wrote on Dec 10, 2008 10:05 AM:
jim colier wrote on Dec 9, 2008 12:24 PM:
'wating for oil to go up" Alaska should be developing now, not wate until oil goes up. J C "
Jim from Boston wrote on Dec 9, 2008 10:40 AM:
And she gave every man, woman and child in Alaska a big fat check. Now you are whining because some of that big fat check goes for gasoline?
You are going to rue the day that Sarah gave us in country an insight into how business is done in Alaska. "
PK wrote on Dec 8, 2008 10:46 PM:
Simply... wrote on Dec 8, 2008 9:44 PM: