Taking a pounding at the gas pump


Published on Monday, December 8, 2008 8:39 PM AKST

While residents in the Lower 48 enjoy the lowest gasoline prices in nearly five years, we’re scratching our heads in Alaska while paying at the pump.

A national survey conducted by oil industry analyst Trilby Lundberg released Sunday shows the price of regular unleaded gasoline has dropped 22 cents a gallon over the past two weeks. The national average price of $1.75 a gallon is the lowest since March 2004. This is good news for those in the Lower 48 looking to stretch their dollars during this latest recession.

It’s also still a mystery exactly why Alaska — a state that produces considerable amounts of domestic oil and has oil refining capabilities — continues to have the highest prices at the pump in the nation. AAA reports that in Wasilla, the average price of regular unleaded, while down from summer highs well over $4, is still $2.59 a gallon, more than 80 cents over the national average.

The rapid rise of Alaska gasoline prices concerned state officials enough to launch an investigation. The probe concludes Alaska prices are falling more slowly than everywhere else because our refineries are having trouble staying in the black.

Geographically, Alaska is far removed from the Lower 48 and it would be unrealistic to expect we would always pay less than the rest of the nation. That said, we deserve better when filling up.

That Alaska pays the highest per gallon for gasoline in the United States is embarrassing. The same would be true if residents of Idaho paid substantially more for potatoes or Washington residents paid more than anyone else for apples.

During a campaign visit to the Frontiersman prior to the Nov. 4 election, Mark Begich said he’s as frustrated as anyone over Alaska’s gas prices. Over the past 18 months, our prices rose faster and more steeply than the rest of the nation, and now are falling at a snail’s pace compared to the Lower 48, a phenomenon Begich said deserves attention from our state’s national delegation.

We agree. Now that he’s set to be our next U.S. senator, having upset incumbent Sen. Ted Stevens, Begich has an opportunity to make good on this pledge.

What has changed over the last 18 months to warrant this drastic turnaround in our local energy market? If the state’s refineries cannot turn a profit, how can this be remedied? Do we need to take measures to ensure more of our own oil is being refined and distributed here at home? Do we need more refining capacity or more production from the North Slope, and if so, how can we make this happen?

That we pay more for gasoline than anyone else in the nation is a symptom. We hold Begich to his promise to seek a diagnosis.

 

Comments

78 comment(s)

    John wrote on Dec 23, 2008 11:33 AM:

    " There has not been one intelligent response here to Ed of AZ's questions. Not one. Just abuse.

    And if local yokels have a problem with "outsiders" opining, they need to talk to the newspaper's editors about changing the "rules". Until then, Ed and other "outsiders" haven't done one thing wrong by blogging here--the locals need to develop a spine, that's all.

    These abusive people are everything Americans perceived Sara Palin to be--and didn't vote for her--because of those perceptions.

    There are blogs elsewhere, Ed, where people behave better than this. "

    Nostalgia wrote on Dec 23, 2008 6:48 AM:

    " It sure does appear ConocoPhillips, BP Arco and Exxon are deliberately punishing Alaskans at the pumps. And we are supposed to be nice to them and trust them? PLEASE !!! "

    To Ed from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 9:30 PM:

    " HA HA! This time Mr. Intellect writes a comment about other people's intelligence but includes the following line in his nonsense..
    'I woud like to have Sarah supporters answer questions, therefore I am here until soeone does.'
    Hey Ed..what does 'woud' and 'soeone' mean, Mr. Brain? And there must be a hundred ways your dumb, boring questions have been proven wrong. Now it's just old. You are too dumb to understand or listen. That's why nobody is responding to you anymore except to make fun of you. Who wants to lower themselves to the level of an idiot? "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 6:21 PM:

    " Mad Dog wrote on Dec 22, 2008 1:19 PM:

    " After reading all of the comments here, I'm wondering why anyone is giving this fool Troll from AZ any response at all. Ignore him, and the troll will crawl back under his bridge. "

    Dear Mad Dog, Should you like to answer any of my previous questions, I would be quite happy. Or is it the Palin supporters do not have an answer?

    Easier to smear and hide from fact, huh. "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 6:18 PM:

    " Saltboy wrote on Dec 22, 2008 4:11 PM:

    " Um, Edward from AZ, why is it you spend so much time on the Frontiersman paper, home to about 4000 paper subscribers? Just curious.

    Thanks "

    I woud like to have Sarah supporters answer questions, therefore I am here until soeone does. "

    The Real Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 6:17 PM:

    " Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008
    :
    " I get bored sitting down here Arizona because nobody here listens to me. They've all realized I'm not very bright and I like to blame other people for my own short-comings. But I think I'm smart, and even if you all prove to me how dim I am it doesn't matter. I can't hear you ...........! "

    Sad one of you idiots must use my name in defense of your failure to respectfully answer questions.
    Guess it shows your intelligence level.

    You protect Sarah why? "

    Saltboy wrote on Dec 22, 2008 4:11 PM:

    " Um, Edward from AZ, why is it you spend so much time on the Frontiersman paper, home to about 4000 paper subscribers? Just curious.

    Thanks "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 3:46 PM:

    " I get bored sitting down here in Arizona because nobody here listens to me anymore. They've all realized I'm not very bright and I like to blame other people for my own short-comings. But I think I'm smart, and even if you all prove to me how dim I am it doesn't matter. I can't hear you very well anyway with my head stuck up here. Oh! Time to go! I have to go take my pills and drink my Kool Aid! "

    akchris64 wrote on Dec 22, 2008 3:22 PM:

    " Edward from AZ wrote: How is it that they own you? If in fact they are out to gouge, maybe it is pay back for the higher taxes your girl has put in " Simple Ed; do you have a choice and how much you pay for gas in Alaska? You are "owned" my friend. Also, I do agree with you that I wouldn't put it past the oil companies to "rape us at the pumps" to show Gov Palin whose in charge. They are truely domestic terrorists like Nostalgia suggests; vindictive and coniving. "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 1:57 PM:

    " Nostalgia wrote on Dec 22, 2008 8:35 AM:

    " We pay the highest price for fuel because we are OWNED by ConocoPhillips, Exxon and BP Arco. They rape us at the pumps because they care so much about us Alaskans...NOT!! Gov Palin is the first Gov willing to stand up to these domestic terrorists. You go Girl! "


    How is it that they own you? If in fact they are out to gouge, maybe it is pay back for the higher taxes your girl has put in "

    Mad Dog wrote on Dec 22, 2008 1:19 PM:

    " After reading all of the comments here, I'm wondering why anyone is giving this fool Troll from AZ any response at all. Ignore him, and the troll will crawl back under his bridge. "

    Nostalgia wrote on Dec 22, 2008 8:35 AM:

    " We pay the highest price for fuel because we are OWNED by ConocoPhillips, Exxon and BP Arco. They rape us at the pumps because they care so much about us Alaskans...NOT!! Gov Palin is the first Gov willing to stand up to these domestic terrorists. You go Girl! "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 7:58 AM:

    " jp wrote on Dec 22, 2008 6:36 AM:

    " yeah spankles, he's worse than i am!!!

    worthy of noting;
    there are a whole lot more trailer parks in Arizona than here!.........!
    turbo tax makes everyone feel like a pro!

    hahahahaha "

    Sorry pal, I spent many years even prior to software where ya had to know the law not just fill in spaces. So you and Spankies please explain why Sarah fails to report the per diems, and personal expense funds and offset them on her "1040"PS thats the fed return "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 7:55 AM:

    " Poor Ed wrote on Dec 19, 2008 7:54 PM:

    " Poor Ed... you're a professional tax 'accdountant' huh? What exactly is that? I know what an accountant is, but I've never heard of an 'accdountant'. Say, do your clients know that the person doing thier taxes has such a difficult time with spelling and grammar? Or by professional tax 'accdountant' do you mean that you once did your own taxes? Sorry bud...I'm not buying that you're a professional .....................?

    Are you related to Sarah? You rant but have no clue, go watch out your window, watch Russia "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 22, 2008 7:52 AM:

    " Hey eddy you forgot to buy a clue wrote on Dec 19, 2008 5:36 PM:

    " Racers that are in it to make money are in it for profit , hello, pro- racers run their operations as a business, again, get a clue.. you can have a profit, or yo can have a loss, works both ways.. "

    Better reasd up on the IRS code, esp Sec 183 "

    jp wrote on Dec 22, 2008 6:36 AM:

    " yeah spankles, he's worse than i am!!!

    worthy of noting;
    there are a whole lot more trailer parks in Arizona than here!
    the odds are good that "to spankles" has hit the nail on the head!
    turbo tax makes everyone feel like a pro!

    hahahahaha "

    To Spankles wrote on Dec 20, 2008 2:57 AM:

    " I couldn't agree more. But sadly, I doubt he will. He's one of those people that enjoys hiding in the obscurity of the 'net while running his none-too-bright mouth. I picture him as some poor slob who barely made it through school and now spends his time at the trailer park posting on sites like this. I doubt anybody listens to him in the real world, so this is all he has for a vain attempt at making himself heard. Just another pseudo-intellect. "

    Spankles wrote on Dec 20, 2008 12:22 AM:

    " Maybe if we all ignore Arizona Ed, he will go away. He's very annoying. "

    Poor Ed wrote on Dec 19, 2008 7:54 PM:

    " Poor Ed... you're a professional tax 'accdountant' huh? What exactly is that? I know what an accountant is, but I've never heard of an 'accdountant'. Say, do your clients know that the person doing thier taxes has such a difficult time with spelling and grammar? Or by professional tax 'accdountant' do you mean that you once did your own taxes? Sorry bud...I'm not buying that you're a professional anything. Well, maybe a gas attendant. Garbage man? Car wash clerk? Grocery bagger? HA! "

    Hey eddy you forgot to buy a clue wrote on Dec 19, 2008 5:36 PM:

    " Racers that are in it to make money are in it for profit , hello, pro- racers run their operations as a business, again, get a clue.. you can have a profit, or yo can have a loss, works both ways.. "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 19, 2008 3:30 PM:

    " Poor Ed wrote on Dec 18, 2008 7:23 PM:

    " No, little Ed, I'm not 'afraid' of listing a boring list of all the different ways an adult man can use his own brain to find things out for himself. And I won't be goaded into it just because you gave the expected and predictable response of 'they must not exist'. I .................."

    In response, I am a professional tax accdountant and have listed the IRS Code which rules. Since you have not indicated where I am wrong, we know that you are. "

    Poor Ed wrote on Dec 18, 2008 7:23 PM:

    " No, little Ed, I'm not 'afraid' of listing a boring list of all the different ways an adult man can use his own brain to find things out for himself. And I won't be goaded into it just because you gave the expected and predictable response of 'they must not exist'. I'm tired of every lame and lazy person in here expecting others to think for them. You choose to babble whatever latest headline you read and that, I expect, is about the limit of your effort. It's nobodys obligation to do it for you. "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 18, 2008 4:52 PM:

    " Not Engaged in "For Profit"
    Section 183(c) defines "activity not engaged in for profit" to be any activity other than those that would have expenses allowed as a "trade or business" (§ 162) or "investment" (§ 212).

    There is presumption the activity is "for profit" created in § 183(d) by "three out of five year" rule. Gross income from the activity must exceed deductions from the activity in three of the previous five years. If it does then the activity is likely presumed to be an activity engaged in for profit. The taxpayer must show a "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 18, 2008 4:44 PM:

    " Poor Ed wrote on Dec 18, 2008 3:12 PM:

    " My 'siurce'(?) I guess you mean 'source'? That would be my eyes. Because I read. The local papers. 2 out-of-state papers. National news (AP, etc.) I love you people that can't find things for yourself and then ask everybody else to cite thier sources like a bibiliography in order to 'prove' it to you. Pull your head out and go look it up yourself............? "


    Well, since you choose to not show sources, I guess you are afraid to admit they do not exist. "

    Poor Ed wrote on Dec 18, 2008 3:12 PM:

    " My 'siurce'(?) I guess you mean 'source'? That would be my eyes. Because I read. The local papers. 2 out-of-state papers. National news (AP, etc.) I love you people that can't find things for yourself and then ask everybody else to cite thier sources like a bibiliography in order to 'prove' it to you. Pull your head out and go look it up yourself. But then, that would prove you've been wrong and we can't have that, can we? "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 18, 2008 2:26 PM:

    " Poor Mr. Ed wrote on Dec 17, 2008 3:08 PM:

    " You're funny! Hey, Ed! Hate to be the one to break it you buddy...but those issues have ALREADY been addressed and found to be FALSE! HA HA

    My friend, none of these issues have been resolved. The per diems , tax returns, clothing, etc are still valid questions. In youtr mind if they have been proven to be false, please show your siurce of information.

    Thank you. "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 18, 2008 2:23 PM:

    " Ed...what a smart guy wrote on Dec 18, 2008
    " Gee...I guess somebody should let all those guys at NASCAR know that they need to get a job and quit wasting thier time with that silly multi-billion dollar hobby! LOL! What an idiot! "

    Your post proves your are un-informed. A hobby is one which you are not in it to necessarily make a profit , to be considered a business, you need to have a profit in 3 of the past 5 years, including the current years return.

    Nascar people do it year round, Todd not "

    Ed...what a smart guy wrote on Dec 18, 2008 11:39 AM:

    " Gee...I guess somebody should let all those guys at NASCAR know that they need to get a job and quit wasting thier time with that silly multi-billion dollar hobby! LOL! What an idiot! "

    Hey Eddy by vowel get a clue wrote on Dec 18, 2008 8:10 AM:

    " Why don't you tell that to all the racers in the country that get paid for what they do it IS a business, and its legal under the Irs code, look it up. It is not a hobby if you get paid to do it, get clue, open your mind up to reality. Racing is a multi-billion dollar industry, far removed from a hobby... "

    Poor Mr. Ed wrote on Dec 17, 2008 3:08 PM:

    " You're funny! Hey, Ed! Hate to be the one to break it you buddy...but those issues have ALREADY been addressed and found to be FALSE! HA HA! You just proved how clueless you are!! (But to be fair, the press down there only makes a big headline with the accusation. Once they're proven to be full of crap, the media puts it in tiny print in the back of the paper, if the print it all.) "

    jp wrote on Dec 17, 2008 12:24 PM:

    " well, Ed is from Arizona, perhaps the heat has left him a bit parched, and foggy-headed, but Ed, there is an oasis out there for you. i'm certain Obama will shower you with wealth-fare, feed the needy, the hungary, the poor, the too lazy to work crowd!

    i figure it this way: all he has to do as president is put everyone on welfare, socialized medicine, free government bailouts for overspending, and we're all sitting in high cotton!

    i have seen the light! where do i sign up? "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 17, 2008 7:59 AM:

    " Poor Mr. Ed wrote on Dec 16, 2008

    " What 'question'? All we see is endless, hollow tripe from you. 'Accusations' that are just the same, tired, re-hashed and false smears

    Smears, are you serious. OK here goes:

    Per diem reports for working from home can not be supported by Alaskan law;

    Fraudulent expense reports for personal family travel, which were altered after the fact;

    Gifts recieved ;

    none of these items reported on tax returns. Then the Hobby, for which expenses deducted beyond allowable amounts.
    Answers please if you understand "

    Lee wrote on Dec 17, 2008 7:52 AM:

    " Are they to claim all these years they were not making a profit? what do they need a bailout to? you want to see a rape, look at Diesel, $.10 cents lower than gas all these years, now a $1.00 higher, when it is the cheapest to make..prices went up they all laughed, now they go down and they want to change production, face it people you all were bought off by the high dividends you received and the extra $1200 stimulus and there is no politician that can or will do a thing "

    Poor Mr. Ed wrote on Dec 16, 2008 11:39 PM:

    " What 'question'? All we see is endless, hollow tripe from you. 'Accusations' that are just the same, tired, re-hashed and false smears that the sheep-herders in the more slanted media outlets have planted in your teeny mind. Anyone intelligent enough to look beyond that finds the truth (oh, wait, I think I see the problem here!). But judging by your grammer and spelling, you probably wouldn't understand it anyway. Now why don't you shoo and go back to bothering your neighbors. Go trade conspiracy theories with Jim from Boston. You two can probably convince each other that you're smart. "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 16, 2008 6:01 PM:

    " Dear Mr. Ed wrote on Dec 16, 2008

    " So let me get this straight; you're oozing in here day after day asking why some Alaskans support thier governor? Why? You're not really 'asking', Asking means you're open to an answer. You're here to bash. You don't live here. You have no clue about half of what you talk about. So by your example I should be busy bothering people across the US as to why they support zero-experience, socialist Obama? Why? It's over. The man won and that's that

    So then humor me with an answer "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 16, 2008 3:55 PM:

    " Well Spankles maybe Sarah can sell some of the clothes they got on e-b ay and put into the fund. Then next year your check might be larger. Opps, can't sell em, she claims they atr in the belly of the plane. "

    The Real Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 16, 2008 3:52 PM:

    " Palin supporters are as intelligent as her "Crookedness". It is becoming obvious with every post that fails to answer questions put forth.

    Just likeher campaign, spout whatever but do not face facts. Geesh, can't even remember what she reads. She is not qualifed to be a dog catcher, the dogs are smarter. "

    Dear Mr. Ed wrote on Dec 16, 2008 3:35 PM:

    " So let me get this straight; you're oozing in here day after day asking why some Alaskans support thier governor? Why? You're not really 'asking', after all. Asking means you're open to an answer. You're just in here to bash. You don't live here. You have no clue about at least half of what you talk about. So by your example I should be busy bothering people across the US as to why they support zero-experience, socialist Obama? Why? It's over. The man won and that's that. Move on, Mr. Ed; you're not listening to Wilber anyway. "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 16, 2008 2:33 PM:

    " Hi I'm Edward. I don't know what I'm talking about. I'm going to leave your local paper alone now. sorry for the rude and uneducated comments. "

    Spankles wrote on Dec 16, 2008 2:28 PM:

    " We are loosing State oil revenue from plummeting oil prices, and we are still paying too much for our gasoline. Alaskans are getting dogged. "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 16, 2008 10:54 AM:

    " Spankles wrote on Dec 16, 2008 2:26 AM:

    " The election is over. why are all these lower48 losers still posting comments? I don't care about thier opinion. "
    Dear Spankles,

    We are not posting comments, just asking for our logical questions to be answered by Palin supporters without deferring to a different topic.

    It appears that since there are no answers fortcoming you are at a loss for words. Does the tryth hurt? "

    jp wrote on Dec 16, 2008 7:40 AM:

    " Gee! what happened to the oil shortage?
    did we miraculously get a whole "S" load of "extra" oil all of a sudden?
    NO!
    our oil prices are controlled by the stock market, and nothing else.
    everyone said we had a shortage, that was a trumped up farce created by stock market, and i'm certain there were lots of people who profited heavily.
    as for our state, i agree with Lud and simply, for every action comes an equal and opposite reaction.
    Mr. larson has been here for what seems to be an eternity, and is a shrewd businessman "

    Lud Larson wrote on Dec 16, 2008 5:00 AM:

    " Simply has it right! The oil companies are getting even for our latest State taxing plan. It's time to get real , people. Lud Larson "

    Spankles wrote on Dec 16, 2008 2:26 AM:

    " The election is over. why are all these lower48 losers still posting comments? I don't care about thier opinion. "

    Mr. Ed and the Boston Baked Bean wrote on Dec 15, 2008 3:18 PM:

    " Ed from AZ and Jim from Boston for Democrat President and VP nominees in 2012! They've already proven that they're more qualified than Obama because they actually have thoughts! Maybe they're not feasible, logical or even correct...but they beat outright lies! YAY! "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 15, 2008 12:24 PM:

    " Dearest Ben C, I have reviewed Sarah's tax returns and find it interesting for the various ommissions and erronious entries.

    So you see I do know something about the matter. You might want to do some research with the IRS on this matter. Publication 17 is a starting point. "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 15, 2008 12:19 PM:

    " Rex dahling,

    Guess you have problems answering questions huh? So you decide much like her "Crookedness" to attack attack attack.

    Seems to me you should sit down with pencil and paper and try to respond in a manner that is educational for yourself and othes. "

    Jim from Boston wrote on Dec 15, 2008 11:39 AM:

    " What should Congress do to fix the economy?
    Well, since the Fed will drop the funds rate near zero Wednesday, that will take monetary policy out of the picture.
    So what do you have left? Fiscal policy. Government investment in growth. Things like high speed rail, education ... or you can go the Japanese route and take a decade of stagnation as they did when they had this problem.
    Sensible regulation should also be reinstated. "

    To the Arizona Wonder wrote on Dec 15, 2008 9:24 AM:

    " Hey, I was given this site as a good place to seek your infinite wisdom! Could you please enlighten me, oh wise sage, as to how Congress should fix the economy? How the White House should bail out the Big 3? What Illinois should do about the vacant Senate seat? Then could you go state-by-state and let us know how they can better thier government and tax system? I anxiously await you to amaze us with your cutting intellect! (Once you're done warming your brain by keeping your head in that oriface.) "

    Rex in Wasilla wrote on Dec 15, 2008 4:02 AM:

    " To Ed in AZ- You still in here spouting your poison? Don't you have a life? Why don't you get a life? or a dog?anything to occupy your small mind. If you were so smart and all knowing why haven't you already solved the nation's problems?
    It must be gratifying for you to try to get a rise out of folks you never met! SOoo.. Eddie, pleeze, go rant and rave in your local rag. If they accept your maddness "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 14, 2008 6:43 PM:

    " To Edward from Az wrote......
    Obviously reading is not your strong point. I said "getting paid for something".

    And it is a hobby by tax law, another area you are not familar with. Per diem expenses again by tax law need to be netted on the tax return, so please respond when your knowledge base is improved.

    And lastly my comments were not about your politics, but federal tax law.

    Curious is there something in the air there that harms the level of intelligence, you almost sound like Sarah..... "

    2 Bushes make a wrong wrote on Dec 14, 2008 6:04 PM:

    " Talk about calling people Liars. Papa Bush and baby Bush were the worst. "

    To Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 14, 2008 4:14 PM:

    " As a retired Dept of Labor employee, I must say that I wish you had been there to straighten us out after all those years of adjudicating claims based on the premise that getting paid for something DOES count as employment! Golly, to think that the Dept of Labor was wrong all that time and you were right! And as far as the per diem questions? You just verified your level of ignorance and inability to go beyond whatever the headlines down there state. Stick to your local politics, as you're clearly out of your element trying to bash ours. "

    I agree wrote on Dec 14, 2008 4:08 PM:

    " Yes, by all means, be very very careful what you wish for! People wanted 'change' a couple years ago and elected a new Congress. Then the housing market busted, the price of gas began to skyrocket and the economy went into a tailspin. In typical short-term memory, people wanted 'change' and put in a ZERO experience, ZERO qualifications liar in office and you know what? I expect we'll have more of that wonderful 'change'! "

    Jo wrote on Dec 14, 2008 1:43 PM:

    " Patrick S - Richmond VA,
    You say we need Governor Sarah Palin in the Whitehouse - well - when George W was governor of Texas everybody said he needed to be in the Whitehouse. They got their wish and boy have we paid dearly for it.
    Be very, very careful what you wish for. "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 14, 2008 1:37 PM:

    " Getting paid for something does not make it a business. And having sponsers does not make it a business. It is a hobby and should be taxed as such.

    Regardless, lets have your answer regarding the failure to report the per diem and other expense payments recieved on the tax returns. Now we cn't say we forgot, ands if we do, I would have to question the competence of this politician.

    So dio tell. "

    Poor Ed tisk tisk wrote on Dec 14, 2008 7:14 AM:

    " Todd's snowmachine racing is not a hobby, he gets PAID for doing it, that makes it professional, he has corporate sponsors, me snowmanching is a hobby, I don't get paid. And as for our high prices here, we ship in more than you realize for fuel, because our refineries are at capacity, mostly for jet fuel and diesel, they can't keep up with demand, we need another refinery here, so we don't have to ship it back to AK "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 12, 2008 7:32 PM:

    " Rex,

    Youbring new meaning to ignorant.

    Guess your head is so deeply buried in the sand you hsve a difficult time finding reality.
    So sorry for you. "

    Ben C wrote on Dec 12, 2008 7:13 PM:

    " Oh, I get it now. After reading all of Edward's blogs I see what his issue is; he's desperately grasping at any random or remote idea in an effort to rant about Sarah Palin. Hey, I'm not going to defend the lady; I'm actually going to defend EVERYONE else in here that has an issue with Sarah Palin because at least they know what they're talking about and have made opinions based on what they know. I can respect that. But some dude from a few thousand miles away throwing out incorrect statements, bizarre assumptions and such? Stay in AZ! "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 12, 2008 5:36 PM:

    " My friend,

    Your tax structure bothers me not. Your stealing horse bleep and her ways bother me. To think she could have been a heartbeat from the Presidency is still a frightening thought.

    And what ya gonna do when the oil taxes drop and your sweet Sarah can't balance her budget. Remember her mark in Wasilla. What was it from a 20 million drop to a budget deficit?

    But my main problem is her theivery, and cheating. And this should worry all her constituents. "

    Rex in Wasilla wrote on Dec 12, 2008 5:12 PM:

    " To Ed in AZ-Blinded by that oil check? acttually it was an energy rebate check and the amount was 1200 dollars- some BIG windfall huh?(probably seems like it to you bottom 48 fanatics), but hey don't let factts get in the way of your loony ranting against our gov. You're probably just tickedoff that your FENCE kept your housekeeper from showing up this month. If so blame Bush not Palin, as she did'nt build your fence. So ED enjoy your cheap gas and clean your own house. "

    To Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 12, 2008 3:25 PM:

    " We are one of the least-taxed states in the Union. Instead of sales tax and income tax, our state infrastructure is paid for by taxes on the oil. Sorry if that chafes you so much, but in the end you just seem like a crybaby who is whining because he doesn't have what others have. But please keep posting...your blabbering is funny and entertaining. "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 12, 2008 3:18 PM:

    " Dear Patrick,
    If you believe Sarah is effective, you must be blind.

    Exactly what is she effective at??

    Certainly not doing interviews. Certainly not addressing crowds discussing her politics, other than mud-slinging.

    About the only effective things she does is accept free clothes, free trips, and fraudulent expense re-imbursements from Alaska. Or to use another word, she is effective at stealing other peoples $$$$$$$$$$$.

    Then she files fraudulent tax returns using H & R Block effectively failing to give them the necessary info.

    I'm so impressed (not) with Sarah. "

    Patrick S - Richmond VA wrote on Dec 12, 2008 11:53 AM:

    " Palin bashers have to tear her down because she's effective. They're afraid of her.

    You folks in Alaska can thank your lucky stars that you have the great Sarah Palin as your governor. She is exactly what we need in the White House!

    Long live Sarah Palin! "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 12, 2008 10:58 AM:

    " Dear rex,

    I am not lying, and you know it. Try reading IRS tax code. You can not deduct expenses greater than income for hobbies, and Todd's snow mobile racing is just a hobby.

    Expenses paid by Alaska are to be matched against the actual expenses ncurred to determine which is higher. If actual expenses are higher then you can deduct the excess, if the monies recieved by arah are greater, then the excess is income. She has strangely failed to make this part of her returns.

    Oh well., guess the oil check blinds you. "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 12, 2008 10:53 AM:

    " To the 3 Bobbleheads,

    Please pull your heads out of your oil wells. Sarah has made fools of you. Guess reality is not something you see or believe in. Look at her actions, answer the questions I have asked. See the REALITY of the facts:

    Fraudulent per diems, fraudulent expense reports, personal expenses charged to Alaskans, freebies not reported, which add up to fraudulent tax returns based upon returns for 2007 she has released.

    And now you pay such a high amount for gas, as I enjoy $ 1.62 per gallon, with state taxes added. "

    Rex in Wasilla wrote on Dec 11, 2008 5:19 PM:

    " To Ed in AZ- Man! everywhere I look in my LOCAL paper there your blogs are.
    Do you not have a life that you have to spend so much effort spewing your venomous lies in OUR paper? Sinnce you know so much about ALASKA laws, maybe you could state the statutes, laws, codes, that you state Palin violated, and what evidence you use to prove the alleged violation. If none that SHUT YOUR LYING MOUTH! "

    To what a clown wrote on Dec 11, 2008 4:55 PM:

    " All the papers in his surrounding area probably stopped printing whatever fell out of his head, so he had to resort to finding other venues for his ridiculous tripe. Have you noticed that nobody in here really responds to him? Kind of like the crazy people that loiter around downtown muttering while everybody around ignores them? Maybe he'll get bored here and find some small paper in Illinois to bother. "

    What a clown wrote on Dec 11, 2008 3:07 PM:

    " So did Edward from AZ get dumped by some girl from Alaska? Why else does he feel the need to spend so much time in here spitting venom? I admit, I do find his comments amusing and I appreciate his willingness to make himself appear so foolish for our entertainment, but I still have to wonder what his motivations are. If there was at least some small indicator that he knew what he was talking about, rather than just endless inane jibberish. "

    Edward from AZ wrote on Dec 11, 2008 2:47 PM:

    " Duh,

    The oil companies are passing along the high taxes that your governor helped assess to enable her to issue you those wonderful annual checks. So it sit back and then contact her Highness and ask for relief. Your gift check is now biting you in the butt.


    You betcha, wink wink. "

    Guru wrote on Dec 11, 2008 11:56 AM:

    " No it is not gouging, it is pay back for the fuel relief money we all received on our dividend this year. Once that money is all spent the price will drop. "

    To Jim from Boston wrote on Dec 10, 2008 12:23 PM:

    " Excuse me sir, but I think if I was from your state I would be careful criticizing the politics of any other state in the Union. The people there voted for and are represented by a philandering alcoholic that should be in prison for manslaughter (if not murder). If that is the type of person you feel best represents your interests, then your opinion regarding our political representatives is entirely without weight. "

    Blathering Democrat wrote on Dec 10, 2008 11:39 AM:

    " The price of fuel is Bush and Palin's fault! The Democrat Congress during the last two years is not to blame! I don't care what Obama voted (because I don't pay attention anyway...I let the press tell me what's happening!), it's still all Bush's fault! I live in Boston but somehow I know what the Permanent Dividend Fund is about because I'm a good guesser! And if I don't know, I just let my liberal buddies tell me! Nobody here will listen to me so I log on to newspapers far away and leave silly messages on them! "

    John Harkey wrote on Dec 10, 2008 10:05 AM:

    " Send your congressional delegation an email, ask them to supply a 'good' answer, not skirt the issue as has been their M O in this instance. It is GOUGING at its best! "

    jim colier wrote on Dec 9, 2008 12:24 PM:

    " Here in Wrangell we just received a shipment of fuel , gas droped from 4.79 to 4.25 , a far cry from 2.60, you should feel lucky. I wrote ower Govenor and asked to put in more refineries instead of a gas line to Canada, no remark, I called ower legislator and asked what they were doing and received a answer ,
    'wating for oil to go up" Alaska should be developing now, not wate until oil goes up. J C "

    Jim from Boston wrote on Dec 9, 2008 10:40 AM:

    " I'm confused. Sarah Palin, world famous energy expert, negotiated and got tough with big oil. That's what she said.

    And she gave every man, woman and child in Alaska a big fat check. Now you are whining because some of that big fat check goes for gasoline?

    You are going to rue the day that Sarah gave us in country an insight into how business is done in Alaska. "

    PK wrote on Dec 8, 2008 10:46 PM:

    " You think fuel is expensive now, wait till all of the North Slope's ultra low sulfur is being hauled up by trucks. It's already started, but wait till they are running 30 to 60 truck loads a day up there. Diesel will be at an all time high in this state. Perfect timing. This is all because of some permit that the state wouldn't issue, good going politicians. The oil companies are now going to teach this state a lesson, only problem is the people are the ones that are going to pay. "

    Simply... wrote on Dec 8, 2008 9:44 PM:

    " We are being gouged by the oil industry. For years we paid at, or just below the national average for gas. Since then we have removed all state gasoline tax....we should be 5-8 cents BELOW the national avg., here in South Central. The oil industry is just sticking it to us. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Classifieds




Make Us Your Homepage