At about 1 p.m. Sunday, Meredith Mapes was mushing her team along the Iditarod Trail as part of the Aurora Dog Mushers Club’s 50-50 race.
About a mile and a half east of the Little Susitna crossing a snowmachine came out of nowhere and hit her team. The machine was riding a trail that goes from Point MacKenzie up to Big Lake, crossing along the way the Iditarod trail.
|
|
Myers described the tangle as a freak accident — neither Mapes nor the snowmachine driver saw each other until it was much too late.
Efforts to contact Mapes failed as of press time.
Myers said Mapes was unhurt and neither, apparently, was the snowmachine driver. But his machine was wrecked, one dog suffered a broken leg and another is still missing.
“It hit so hard that it ripped the harnesses off the dog,” Myers said. The missing dog, a brown fellow with a white face that goes by the name of Logo, just took off.
“It was so spooked that it left the scene,” Myers said.
The dog, she said, should be wearing black booties with yellow Velcro, a black harness and a collar.
Mapes wasn’t the only musher to scratch from the race. Erin Redington, who stopped to help Mapes after the crash, added Mapes’ bruised and bewildered dogs to her own team to bring them home.
“She just gave up her whole race,” Myers said.
Another Redington, Ray Redington, stopped to pick up the wounded dog and brought the animal to race’s end in the basket of his sled.
“It’s great how people just jump in and help,” Myers said.
Cim Smyth, the eventual winner of the race, tried to help Mapes but couldn’t get his dogs stopped. He donated half his purse to Erin Redington for her efforts.
The 50-50 race is an annual event for the club, it runs from Big Lake to the Nome sign on the Iditarod Trail and back. The two-day race goes 50 miles each day.
Myers said Mapes was the only junior musher on the trail that day, but she’s a very accomplished athlete, having already run the Junior Yukon Quest and Junior Iditarod. She’s training to run the Junior Iditarod again this year.
It’s very uncommon for a sled dog team to be hit by a snowmachine. Myers said in her years running the Aurora Dog Mushers it hadn’t happened prior to Sunday.
“We’re going to probably see more and more of it now that we’re getting more people out here,” she said. “I really hope not. But it’s always the fear of the mushers.”
Contact Andrew Wellner at andrew.wellner@frontiersman.com or 352-2270.

Comments
55 comment(s)knik trail rider wrote on Jan 5, 2009 2:24 PM:
Knik Cruiser wrote on Jan 4, 2009 4:37 PM:
It's just, this incident could have been so easily avoided ,with a simple trail marker, marking a race trail crossing for other users to see. Unlike a moose.....Thanks for confirming the facts. "
Fellow trail user wrote on Jan 4, 2009 4:30 AM:
Knik Cruiser wrote on Jan 2, 2009 10:47 PM:
THERE WAS NO FLAGGING, ON A BLIND CORNER AND RACE TRACK CROSSING.Have you ever had, or seen a moose run in front of your [a] car? You really should yield to the moose,they don't stop fast. you're more manuverable,,but sometimes theres no warning or time to swerve or do anything but brake and slide...SO you hit the moose. Seen hundreds of hit moose, Was everyone driving too fast?
Be nice if they were all painted orange with an X on them..... "
jp wrote on Jan 2, 2009 9:46 PM:
i don't really have anything against mushers or dogsledding, but i do question some of the things that some organizers do, and the fact that the mushers will go along with it.
there are lots of snowmobilers that have a terrible sense of responsibility/etiquette.
i just hope that no one else has to go through this. "
Champ wrote on Jan 2, 2009 11:45 AM:
Chugiak musher wrote on Jan 1, 2009 4:22 PM:
ok...this is good. wrote on Jan 1, 2009 3:24 PM:
it has been stated here several times that a "dogsled is not easy to stop" and that "its not easy to slow teams quickly".
so the snowmachine and the dogsleds have this in common.
why didnt she stop her dogteam at the intersection?
its a no-fault occurence-
but if the race is involved, and not well-marked, and i was the snowmachiner, i would sue the race organizers for damages to my machine. "
Mat-Su wrote on Jan 1, 2009 2:32 PM:
akwild wrote on Jan 1, 2009 11:56 AM:
akwild wrote on Jan 1, 2009 11:54 AM:
Mat.Su wrote on Jan 1, 2009 10:20 AM:
FLAGGING OF SOME KIND INDICATING A RACE IS IN PROGRESS AT ALL CROSSINGS FOR OTHER USERS TO SEE AND UNDERSTAND...PERIOD..
WHOS PAYING FOR THE MACHINE "
Kelley Griffin wrote on Jan 1, 2009 9:37 AM:
lisnup wrote on Jan 1, 2009 8:25 AM:
Concerning a race, the sponsor/s need to be accountable for marking and safety for the event, publication in the paper and on the web is not sufficient, I would consider it advertising not a posting for race safety. The sponsors of any event is liable.
No speed is posted to how they use the trail so no fault to the snowmachiner speed. "
RLT wrote on Jan 1, 2009 7:35 AM:
Kristen wrote on Dec 31, 2008 8:46 PM:
---
Dog teams are generally going around 10-12mph. Slow down?? What about snow machines going 60 mph??
----
#3.Innocent trail user has dogteam drive in front of it, and remeber he was 2nd machine out of 4.
---
Stopping a dog team is not as simple as stopping a snowmachine. By the time she could have stopped, she may have been through the intersection. Let's also not forget the fact that dog teams ALWAYS have the right of way on trails. "
Nina wrote on Dec 31, 2008 8:03 PM:
Jeff Deeter wrote on Dec 31, 2008 7:53 PM:
Mat-Su wrote on Dec 31, 2008 7:49 PM:
#1. NO FLAGGING OF ANY KIND ABOUT A RACE.
#2.INEXPERIENCED DRIVER PULLED IN FRONT ON MOVING MACHINE
#3. MACHINER WAS #2 IN LINE OF 4
#4.RACE ORGANIZERS ARE TO BLAME
#5. I BET THEY MARK THAT, AND ALL BLIND CROSSINGS BETTER
#6.TRAIL IS JUST 1 OF MANY MULTI-USE TRAILS IN AREA
#7. THEIRE ARE NON-MOTORIZED TRAIL IN BOROUGH TO HOLD DOG RACES ON....USE THEM ANDS AVOID PROBLEMS
#8.CAN YOU IMAGINE IF IT HAD BEEN 20 ABOVE, THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN HUNDREDS OF RECREATIONALISTS IN THE AREA "
skier Bob wrote on Dec 31, 2008 7:01 PM:
to Wil wrote on Dec 31, 2008 6:49 PM:
LB wrote on Dec 31, 2008 5:04 PM:
The race was printed in the paper and listed on many web sites. There is another race this weekend using the same trail. Non-motorized always has right of way on a multi-use trail. "
tonedg wrote on Dec 31, 2008 4:53 PM:
lab wrote on Dec 31, 2008 4:08 PM:
Meadow Lakes Madman wrote on Dec 31, 2008 3:35 PM:
Ol Bear wrote on Dec 31, 2008 3:24 PM:
Jamie from MN wrote on Dec 31, 2008 1:37 PM:
Mulituse means just that. Multiuse.
This was an organized race. mark it as such.
I agree the liability is with the race coordinators.
I, too would look to them for damages for the snowmachine. "
Jamie wrote on Dec 31, 2008 8:33 AM:
Something like this:
http://houghtonlake.info/images/s3600015.jpg "
events wrote on Dec 31, 2008 8:32 AM:
and a sfatey plan, right?
and general commerical liability insurance to operate the event right?
thats who i would ask to pay for a broken snowmachine.
if they dont have permits, insurance or a license to operate a business, go after the organizers.
liability is in their hands. "
B wrote on Dec 31, 2008 3:01 AM:
Mat-su wrote on Dec 30, 2008 11:31 PM:
#1.Inexperienced musher not in tune with the sound of machines and to be more aware and slow down.
#2.Poorly put on event, no markers or trailguards.
#3.Innocent trail user has dogteam drive in front of it, and remeber he was 2nd machine out of 4.
#4.Someone should offer to repair the machine ! ! !
Very good akwild, thank you. "
akwild wrote on Dec 30, 2008 9:49 PM:
Mat-Su wrote on Dec 30, 2008 8:46 PM:
Brenda wrote on Dec 30, 2008 7:28 PM:
jp wrote on Dec 30, 2008 7:07 PM:
expired tags, and generally unsafe polluting vehicles?
this was directed towards "bad image"
you classified all snowmobilers as poor drivers.
that's hardly fair, like what i just wrote is.
there are bad apples in every user group.
but there has to be parameters set "standards" and perhaps for our snowmobile license fees, we could get a drivers manual for them.
and charge mushers a fee as well!!! they use the same trails!!! "
Mat-Su wrote on Dec 30, 2008 7:05 PM:
many events that take place on all the multi-use trails in the Valley, that are done right, Watch when the K-200,,K-300, Iron Dog,Susitna 100 are put on, some use the same trail...... there are stakes everywhere!!! Who's paying for the snowmobile repair? The driver should sue for damages, negligence on the part of the race organizers "
jp wrote on Dec 30, 2008 4:27 PM:
were you there? did you see caution tape, or any signs stating that there was a race going on?
i was out there riding that day, i had no clue there was a race going on, neither did anyone i was riding with.
the race event coordinator should have at least made an attempt at letting perhaps local businesses know, or post a few signs at trail heads or intersections.
lucky more of them didn't get hit. geez "
Bad image...... wrote on Dec 30, 2008 4:00 PM:
payfor my machine wrote on Dec 30, 2008 2:16 PM:
if you cant control your dogteam, find another sport.,
these are multi-use trails.
figure it out. "
Curious1 wrote on Dec 30, 2008 1:51 PM:
Kelley Griffin wrote on Dec 30, 2008 9:51 AM:
The only way to mark 100% of the trail to cross traffic is to run 50 miles of snow fence.
Also, races are not the only time dogteams, ski-jorers, skiers, snowshoers, and those crazy bicycle athletes, etc, are out there, and they are also not just on the Iditarod.
Ride Aware! Be Seen! Play nice together! "
akwild wrote on Dec 30, 2008 9:50 AM:
LJ wrote on Dec 30, 2008 9:43 AM:
to Intersection wrote on Dec 30, 2008 9:08 AM:
jp wrote on Dec 30, 2008 9:06 AM:
there are plenty of trails that are "no motorized vehicle" trails up by willow that could be utilized as well.
or in denali park for that matter.
i think there was a serious lack of responsibility by the organizers this time!
don't blame just the snowmobiler. "
DustMusher wrote on Dec 30, 2008 8:57 AM:
Many thanks to the good sportsmen, Erin Reddington, Ray Reddington and Cym Smyth on their actions.
We flatlanders on the Outside salute y'all "
Marlene Daniels wrote on Dec 30, 2008 8:50 AM:
Mat Su wrote on Dec 30, 2008 7:33 AM:
lisnup wrote on Dec 30, 2008 7:22 AM:
Be responsible and keep everyone safe. "
intersections wrote on Dec 30, 2008 7:05 AM:
it occured at an INTERSECTION of trails.
Neither party yielded.
This is what is called a "no fault occurence". "
Kelley Griffin wrote on Dec 29, 2008 11:53 PM:
BTW, I really want to thank the snowmachiners that do see the dogs- 99.9% are courteous and give right-of-way, most times even shutting off the engine. "
cori wrote on Dec 29, 2008 11:17 PM:
james wrote on Dec 29, 2008 10:48 PM:
james wrote on Dec 29, 2008 10:44 PM:
i would think people riding them would be a little more careful thank god in this case there werent more serious injuries. i imagine the musher would have felt better if they could give the snowmachine rider a good smack up side the head for being so stupid. its just a a shame the musher trained so hard and is wiped out by a careless person "
Marilyn Mapes wrote on Dec 29, 2008 10:01 PM: