Big Lake residents split over gravel pit

By TODD L. DISHER
Frontiersman
Published on Sunday, February 8, 2009 12:02 AM AKST

BIG LAKE — Expect heated debate at the Big Lake firehouse when the community council discusses a proposed gravel operation.

At 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, both sides will have a say about the application pending by Bill and Helen Heairet to clear a 9.7-acre ridge on their 40-acre tract off of Belarde Boulevard.

The application has already been passed by the Big Lake Community Council and heads to a Borough Planning Commission in April.

Before it gets there, another session of the community council has been called by local residents who claim they never had the chance to voice their dissent.

“This violates the comprehensive land-use plan in at least four areas and the borough code in at least three,” said resident Greg Strong. “Community council recommendations have to be consistent with the comp plan.”

It’s no wonder the council passed the application, added Strong, because “the council only cares about who their buddy is. We’re trying to break the old vestiges of cronyism here.”

Their intentions are much less sinister, said Bill Heairet. He said this is for the good of the community and plans on selling the gravel for local developments.

“If the borough wants to level roads out here, the pit run has to come from the Parks Highway, so the taxpayers are spending more money” said Heairet. “Material is geographically sold. Developers don’t want to pay the trucking fees if they can get it local.”

However, the portions of the 138,000-cubic-yard ridge that are not sold locally will be trucked out West Lakes Boulevard. Their application provides for 1,000 gravel trucks annually.

“This is a gross over-estimate of the amount that will actually be shipped out. I’ve hauled material out of here for years, and to say there will be an added stress on West Lakes Boulevard, there will be not,” according to Heairet.

“The 40-acre parcel is surrounded by homes on three sides,” warned Strong. “Sometimes these small operations are worse because they don’t feel like the rules apply to them.”

“I’ve done a count myself, and there are 34 houses, none closer than an eighth or a quarter of a mile from the site. Out of those 34, 24 are vacation properties,” said Heairet. “We will only be working Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. until 6 p.m., April through September.”

“People hear ‘gravel pit’ and start thinking of huge walls of rock or giant holes in the ground. That’s not what I’m doing,” Heairet said. “I am simply leveling a ridge, not digging a hole or anything like that.”

Heairet said there are many similar gravel sources around Big Lake that never get permits. Even Strong, he claims, used one to build a private road.

“What people don’t understand is that there is a certain amount of gravel you can sell per year without a permit, and I probably won’t exceed that. I am just trying to make something legal that is probably going to happen anyway.”

Whether this is a case of council cronyism or neighborly overreaction, the community will voice their opinions on Wednesday night.

Contact Todd Disher at todd.disher@frontiersman.com or 352-2252.

Comments

14 comment(s)

    HAPPY wrote on Feb 16, 2009 9:23 PM:

    " JP PLEASE IDENTIFY YOURSELF THANKS FOR YOUR COMMENTS. "

    George wrote on Feb 13, 2009 12:08 PM:

    " that todd disher is one helluva journalist. "

    jp wrote on Feb 11, 2009 6:53 PM:

    " now if he were smart:

    He would hire a contractor (which could be his own company) to get his land leveled, and that company could sell off the gravel.
    you could even apply for a tax exempt status for ( agricultural puposes) on the earth work .

    been there, done that, it works just fine, and nobody can contest it. "

    stir the pot wrote on Feb 11, 2009 4:29 PM:

    " Thanks to Todd Disher for ensuring a "heated debate' at the council meeting. This motion was discussed, voted on, and passed. It is now up to the Borough experts to take up this application and make their decision. If Mr Heairet meets thier requirements he should be allowed to use his land. He is paying taxes on fourty acres. Maybe he could use it for a bird sanctuary. "

    Evets wrote on Feb 11, 2009 4:06 PM:

    " Nobody likes the big pits and now they complain about a very small local pit. Where do they expect the gravel for roads and home development to come from? Having gravel available close to the job greatly reduces the cost of road work and keeps the gravel haul from effecting a much wider area. Give 'em a permit! "

    Learn Something New wrote on Feb 11, 2009 1:58 AM:

    " The Community Council has NOT been called by local residents. The council meets the second Wednesday of every month. The meeting does NOT start at 6:30 it starts at 7:00. The council does NOT stop anyone from voiceing their opinion. YOU have to come to the meeting. Do NOT blame the council for doing it job when YOU cant be bothered to attend. "

    cancel my paper wrote on Feb 11, 2009 1:34 AM:

    " Why dont you get the facts straight before you let people use your paper for their own agenda. Mr Strongs slander of our council is hard to take. These people come to meetings even when they dont have a axe to grind. I cant remember the last time I saw Mr. Strong at a meeting. It was probably the last time he wanted the blessing of the council for one of his developments. "

    was there wrote on Feb 11, 2009 1:07 AM:

    " There should be no more debate over this. Everyone who was at the meeting has a vote. sorry the people who did not bother to come dont like the way it turned out. take it up in planning. Does Mr. Strong, the big developer, not know how this works? "

    call me crony wrote on Feb 11, 2009 1:00 AM:

    " Mr. strong is the only one asking for special consideration. If you want to change something you must come to the meetings and participate. As the article said it was voted on and sent to plating. If you have a complaint find out when their meeting is, and participate. "

    livedhereforever wrote on Feb 10, 2009 2:55 PM:

    " View of Denali from Starboard Cove by something at the other end of the lake, you can't even see it from there, and it's only leveling. I guess a gravel pit directly across from the elementary school is a much safer thing. There are certain residents of Big Lake that have nothing better to do with their pathetic little lives than to create problems where there really aren't any "

    Alaskan Dragonfly wrote on Feb 9, 2009 3:18 PM:

    " Yes, the view will be ruined for many folks. So will the quiet, and the chance to exit my driveway without the fear of getting run over by a gravel truck. This road is not designed for that kind of traffic, and most of us bought our land out here to get away from exactly this sort of thing. "

    aksteelhead wrote on Feb 9, 2009 10:06 AM:

    " Great! A gravel extraction operation in a residential area. I'm sure the residents of the Starboard Cove subdivision won't mind their view of Denali being ruined by this operation. "

    jp wrote on Feb 8, 2009 3:50 PM:

    " bill, i think you just got a great big kick in the keester, now all the people with a bad case of Granoladosis will be all over this like flies on Obama. "

    Valley Kid wrote on Feb 8, 2009 12:38 PM:

    " Sounds like he should have just kept under the radar. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Classifieds




Make Us Your Homepage