Judge rules Anchorage must continue busing deaf student

BY TODD L DISHER
Frontiersman
Published on Thursday, February 19, 2009 10:35 PM AKST

PALMER — A judge in Palmer said the Anchorage School District must continue its bus service for a deaf middle-schooler from Big Lake in a case that highlights the complications of special needs education.

Katelyn Reese has attended the Alaska State School for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing from her first day of class. The school for the deaf was the best place for her to develop, according to her Individual Education Plan (IEP), a plan developed for each special needs student by parents and educators.

The school for the deaf is run by the Anchorage School District, and the district provided a bus for her from Wasilla Middle School to Russian Jack Elementary, where the elementary classes were held. As soon as Reese graduated to middle school, the district discontinued the bus service.

She lived with relatives in Chugiak and Anchorage, but her mother felt she was too far away from her home and family values. She moved back to Big Lake, and her parents are now driving 180 miles a day to take her to and from the school for the deaf at Hanshew Middle School.

“The district said there was a policy from the state that they didn’t bus middle-schoolers [to the school for the deaf],” said Meg Allison, Reese’s attorney with the Disability Law Center.

The family went to the IEP board to reinstate the bus route, but the IEP turned them down.

Once in court, Superior Court Judge Vanessa White ruled in favor of Reese overturning the opinion of the hearing officer. According to the court ruling, the discontinuation of the bus route violates her IEP, and the IEP is a right reserved to Reese under the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

The Anchorage School District is appealing the ruling and asking for the stay on the decision in the meantime. The discontinuation of the bus service is not about age, but about funding, according to ASD superintendent Carol Comeau.

Due to a change in transportation funding last year, the state no longer offers a blanket reimbursement to the district for all its transportation costs. If the ASD has to reinstate the route, they will get no additional help from the state.

“We have to hire a driver and an attendant to communicate with the student, plus pay for the mileage. It ends up being about $80,000 for both ways for one school year,” said Comeau.

According to Eric Fry, spokesman for the Department of Education and Early Development, the state did reimburse the district for all transportation costs when Reese began her schooling.

“That was changed,” said Fry. “Now the state gives the district a certain amount of money per student. For the Anchorage School District, the state gives $384 times the average number of kids who are enrolled during the month of October minus any correspondence students.”

This figure is based on real transportation costs, according to Fry.

“The money they get from the state should come very close to their actual expenses. But if it doesn’t, then they have to find the money in their general funds,” said Fry.

“We do not believe the taxpayers of Anchorage should have to pay for a student to be bussed into our district,” said Comeau.

The school for the deaf is a state school operated by the ASD, and the school enrolls students from all across Alaska. Districts are paid by the state for each student with special needs, and the state pays the ASD $2,576,038 for the 44 deaf students it enrolls, according to Fry. An additional $966,400 goes to the Department of Health and Social Services to operate the boarding facilities for the school for the deaf.

“The students who attend the school for the deaf who are not from the municipality of Anchorage either live with foster families, relatives who live in Anchorage, or at the Student Learning Center run by the non-profit group ARC,” said Comeau.

To be clear, she points out, “we have no objection what so ever for the student to be in the Alaska State School for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing. Our objection strictly relates to who pays for how she gets there. We believe it is the responsibility of the state, the parents or the Mat-Su School District. Parents all over the state have their kids going to this school. We are just concerned with who pays.”

The burden will not fall on the Mat-Su Borough District because the district provides their own services to the deaf. The services have come a long way since Reese first chose to go to the school for the deaf, according to Catherine Esary, spokeswoman for the MSBD.

But it is not likely that Reese will be returning to her local district. Everyone involved agrees that the school for the deaf is the best place for her to study.

“We try to meet the needs of every student who comes in to Mat-Su,” said Esary, “but there they have a culture for deaf students. Sometimes that’s more choice, especially as the kids get older.”

“[The MSBSD] has never been deemed an appropriate place for her,” said Allison. “Everybody agreed [the school for the deaf] was the appropriate place for her.”

Beyond all the budget talks, Allison said, this is really about the 13-year-old girl. The Judge agreed.

“As the judge stated in her ruling, there cannot be an issue about cost. They have to provide the service. It’s not the student’s problem. Money is not an excuse to not provide it. I am quite dismayed about all the focus on cost. It’s really about a young girl getting the services she needs,” said Allison.

Comments

14 comment(s)

    Fed. Mandates wrote on Feb 28, 2009 10:33 AM:

    " This is a Federal Law. Federal Mandates without funds is what puts so much strain on the schools. But now that we have to do this, I am sure the bus can be filled with many more students that could benefit from this great school. Quit complaining about who pays, a kid is a kid and we all are responsible. Of course a lot of people don't care about others that much. How many of you actually vote? "

    HELLO wrote on Feb 23, 2009 4:41 PM:

    " This family really needs to consider their kid. For 1. this trip is 1.5hr in a car on a good day in the summer, not a bus doing the limit the whole way and in the middle of the sh*tty winter weather, that poor kid is gonna be sitting there for 3 hours each way.
    2. This is a 13 year old girl, and the bus driver will be more then likely a guy in his 30's-40's, do the math he drives a bus at this age and there is a helpless little deaf girl !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "

    chris wrote on Feb 21, 2009 1:58 PM:

    " Heck, for 80K a year I will learn to communicate with the kid and drive them back and forth all day!! "

    khbalaska wrote on Feb 21, 2009 11:05 AM:

    " K.S. Wasilla - sure, easy for you to say. It's not YOUR tax dollars! It's the people in ANCHORAGE paying! That's the point. No one is against this child getting a decent education. We need to get something along the same lines going in the Valley or the family needs to move closer within the ASD boundaries if that's where they want their child to go to school. "

    K.S.-wasilla wrote on Feb 21, 2009 9:51 AM:

    " You know I don't see the big deal it's a child who needs special schooling.. I would much rather have my Tax dollars going to this kid than everything they take it for now.We can support a bunch of welfare people who dont want to work, but you complain when a kid needs help????? Grow up people!! "

    I cant hear idiot judges wrote on Feb 21, 2009 9:40 AM:

    " this is crazy, Vote this judge out of office when the day comes. "

    Ak. Territory Baby wrote on Feb 21, 2009 7:21 AM:

    " Can any of you see the forest through the trees? It is a doorway that can be opened up to many deaf students that live in the valley, perhaps the parents had no option but to put them in MSBSD. Until you have walked in the child or the parents shoes, you who are judgemental can't understand what it would be like to be a single child in a classroom with this type of disability. Instead of sitting on our hands and complaining maybe the rest of the valley's deaf children can benefit from this bus. "

    pete wrote on Feb 20, 2009 8:46 PM:

    " To the Mathamatically Challenged-
    Apparently the state "pays" ASD 2.576 Million Bucks for these kids. So lets get off the Anchorage Tax Dollars band wagon- It works out to 58.6k per child. The State pays just under a million to board say 25 of them. That's 40k a kid. Anchorage taxpayers footing the bill-absurd. Pass through dollars from the FED- is probably the majority of the money. So recap- Special Ed Law 101 If ASD won't meet the needs of all the kids they can always forgoe all Fed funding. Seems dumb to me over 80k. "

    Dan wrote on Feb 20, 2009 4:52 PM:

    " No additional tax money should be used for this one student. I am sure that having a deaf child is very challenging, but it is not responsiblity of the other tax payers for the transportation of this one child. It is the families responsiblity. If not...where is my "tax refund" since my wife and I decided not to have children, and thus have not cost the school district any money. "

    Allen wrote on Feb 20, 2009 12:25 PM:

    " It must be nice to be a judge and live in a world where money is never an issue. Especially when there is another option to spending an obcene amount of money on a single student. This judge's name is seared into my memory for next time she's up for retention. "

    patty wrote on Feb 20, 2009 10:47 AM:

    " Has anyone considered the fact that maybe there are other kids who could use this bus, if it were offered?

    This is not just a 1 child case. They are just the ones who were smart enough or had the means to fight for what their child deserves!! Kudos to them!!

    ASD is already transporting 2-3 younger kids and there seems to not be a problem with the cost of the bus for so few. Would the cost be the issue if everyone really knew how many would be on the bus if allowed? There would be 2-3? "

    khbalaska wrote on Feb 20, 2009 9:37 AM:

    " NO NO NO!!! And I don't live in Anchorage but if I did I'd be furious that my property taxes would go to bussing ONE student from a totally different school district. This should be funded by the STATE - not by the ASD, if at all. And, if there are services available in the Valley then why are they being utilized? Give me a break. Money IS an excuse about the issue!! "

    AkLogCabin wrote on Feb 20, 2009 9:33 AM:

    " This is wrong. The kid needs to go to school in the Valley or the parents should be responsible for getting her to Anchorage. I live in the Valley and I do not think the tax payers in Anchorage should have to pay to bus students in to town. My nephew lived in the Dimond school area but went to West. His parents had to drive him. If the school district did not have to bus kids across town they should not have to bus them in from the Valley. What a waste of money. "

    RahRah wrote on Feb 20, 2009 7:40 AM:

    " Make the parents ride this bus and be responsible parents. This judge is wrong, I hope every specal needs child in the Valley get the same service. Where is all the Christian Palin zealots on this, demand your rights, all children are Gods children. Oh don't forget to invite the governor and bring cameras! "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   




Classifieds




Make Us Your Homepage