I am utterly appalled by your recent editorial “Gun control should be a state decision,” which is self-explanatory, but then goes on to support elements of a federal bill introduced by Bobby Rush (D) Illinois. For those who are unfamiliar with Mr. Rush, he represents part of Chicago that is undeniably the most corrupt city in America. His GOA (Gun Owners of America) score is F-, meaning he is not only hostile to guns being owned by law abiding Americans, but he also supports the disarming of Americans through legislation such as HR 45.
What really disturbed me about your editorial is that you advocate the registration of certain guns. Just like the Democratic Party, you seek to split gun owners into two groups, hunters and sportsmen, and everyone else. The Democrats did this as part of their divide and conquer strategy. If the editors had done their homework they would have found out that a) registration does not help the police solve crimes in states that do require registration, and b) gun registration is always a precursor to gun confiscation.
|
|
I would urge the editors to re-examine their position after looking at the facts. A good place to start is www.gunfacts.info. All firearms, including pistols, have their place in our society. But gun registration doesn’t. It starts us down that slippery slope and would eventually cost us our freedom and our safety.
Erik Heiker


Comments
2 comment(s)boo wrote on Mar 3, 2009 10:24 AM:
Concerned wrote on Mar 3, 2009 8:02 AM: