I attended the June 24 school board meeting and spoke in support of memo 09-181, Resolution in Support of Acquiring Land. I had no idea that I should have never used the name “Academy” when I spoke, because I was appalled at what appeared to be genuine dislike/hatred towards Academy Charter School (exception of the support by Jim Colver and Erick Cordero). Our 9-year-old son was shaken up afterward and quite upset, after hearing such distaste directed toward his school. What a bad example some board members set for children.
I had heard in the past that the Mat-Su Borough School Board was not supportive of Academy Charter in general. (I didn’t really believe it). The distaste was linked to the high test scores and high quality of education Academy’s students have received “vs” the remaining public schools, which resulted in our school district not looking so good. How absurd is that? These are the same public school students who will attend Mat-Su public high schools within the same district.
|
|
When our son attended another public school through third grade, he was able to earn ‘A’ grades with practically not having to do anything. The workload to earn straight ‘A’ grades was surprisingly easy for him. He needed to be challenged more, so we applied at Academy. His education since has been specifically tailored to his high level of academic ability. This past year in the fourth grade, he attended fifth-grade Language Arts and Advanced fifth-grade math. That would not have been possible had he remained where he was before.
The last time I checked, Academy Charter was a public school and supposed to be considered part of the Mat-Su Borough School District. Our taxpaying dollars that go to the school district aren’t used toward Academy. No thanks to this current board, don’t say the name “Academy” when asking for any support whatsoever.
The distaste to include the name and association of ‘Academy’ in the now failed resolution only reinforces that. Ms. Hamblen, Ms. Welton, Mr. Thompson, Ms. Pougher and Mr. Larson would only re-consider the resolution if the name ‘Academy Charter’ was stricken from the whole document.
These are some of the board members direct statements I wrote down as they spoke: Hamblen stated, “However inadequate they think they are, other academies have to lease property.” Thompson stated, “It shouldn’t be linked at all to Academy Charter.” Pougher stated Academy didn’t have a large enough share of “their budget to lease properties.”
Welton stated, “Other charter schools pay a lease” and appeared angry to even have to mention the name Academy. Larson was just plain against it from the beginning.
My husband and I now know who not to support in future elections for any public position within our community: Sarah Welton; Ole Larson; Susan Pougher; Myrl Thompson and Vice-President Coleen Hamblen.
This hatefulness truly makes me want to find another school district for our son. How sad is that?
A sincere thank you to Jim Colver and Erick Cordero for speaking up against such adversity. Academy has proven itself over the last 12 years. We hope Academy is able to secure the adjacent acres to its benefit of its public school students.
Contessa Shade Gossett
Palmer


Comments
43 comment(s)Hey my school wants land too. wrote on Jul 6, 2009 10:32 AM:
wake up school board wrote on Jul 5, 2009 3:49 PM:
Purchasing the land is a smart move wrote on Jul 5, 2009 7:59 AM:
Small schools have better connection with students wrote on Jul 5, 2009 7:54 AM:
Budget review process wrote on Jul 4, 2009 7:28 PM:
satisfiedcustomer wrote on Jul 4, 2009 9:16 AM:
publicschoolteacher wrote on Jul 4, 2009 8:57 AM:
Laura wrote on Jul 3, 2009 9:55 AM:
Palmer Political Priorities wrote on Jul 3, 2009 8:45 AM:
Valley Pathways High School a few miles away operates in nothing but portables and bursting at the seams. Where's there new gym? Where's their clout?The Chosen Few? "
No way wrote on Jul 3, 2009 6:47 AM:
my tax money wrote on Jul 2, 2009 8:41 PM:
The school board needs a home school parent on to help keep things in order.
It is my tax money too. "
No way to have accurate income statistics at Academy wrote on Jul 2, 2009 6:40 AM:
facts are facts wrote on Jul 1, 2009 4:10 PM:
a new charter for charters wrote on Jul 1, 2009 3:59 PM:
Cant we get along wrote on Jul 1, 2009 11:08 AM:
PS wrote on Jul 1, 2009 10:37 AM:
Carters percentages reflect the parents wrote on Jul 1, 2009 7:56 AM:
Charter Schools and Alternative Schools Important wrote on Jul 1, 2009 7:50 AM:
Amen to a new charter wrote on Jul 1, 2009 7:18 AM:
NORMAL schools are required to educate the community children, special education included.
I have far more pride in a school that educates kids from the full community rather than the hand picked ideal students.
See you at the polls is right. "
a new charter for charters wrote on Jun 30, 2009 7:47 PM:
Friend of Charter Schools wrote on Jun 30, 2009 2:05 PM:
Double Boo to school board wrote on Jun 30, 2009 1:03 PM:
Bryon wrote on Jun 30, 2009 10:08 AM:
Bryon wrote on Jun 30, 2009 10:07 AM:
easy call wrote on Jun 29, 2009 9:04 PM:
bob wrote on Jun 29, 2009 5:59 PM:
There is more to it... wrote on Jun 29, 2009 3:32 PM:
boo to the School Board wrote on Jun 29, 2009 3:27 PM:
Charter School Parent wrote on Jun 29, 2009 1:25 PM:
Please study Growth Before Opening Charters. wrote on Jun 29, 2009 10:17 AM:
Charter School Fan wrote on Jun 29, 2009 9:47 AM:
Public school parent wrote on Jun 29, 2009 9:30 AM:
NOT receive the local portion of the tax base. They only receive a portion of the state allotment, minus a fee taken by the district. Congrats to Academy for continuing to try to do what is best for their students by acquiring a permanent facility. "
oh its true wrote on Jun 29, 2009 8:47 AM:
Pro-kids wrote on Jun 29, 2009 8:27 AM:
To Contessa wrote on Jun 29, 2009 7:23 AM:
Charter school principals are just given a lump sum of dollars by the district to run their schools rather than deal w/ the budgeting system like the other schools. Yes, Academy is a public school. However, the Academy parents like to hold themselves and their children aside as if they are in a private school. The school boards attitude toward the resolution is a reflection of how the community feels toward Academy. Stand in line, there are other needs. "
in Palmer wrote on Jun 28, 2009 11:51 PM:
Contessa wrote on Jun 28, 2009 9:33 PM:
Contessa wrote on Jun 28, 2009 9:30 PM:
Contessa wrote on Jun 28, 2009 9:28 PM:
First Impressions of Your School wrote on Jun 28, 2009 10:17 AM:
in wasilla wrote on Jun 28, 2009 9:52 AM:
Dumb em down wrote on Jun 28, 2009 9:23 AM:
hmmmm wrote on Jun 27, 2009 10:41 PM: