As outlined in its plan concept, the city is considering building a space to accommodate conferences and conventions, an agricultural museum and art gallery, and community and non-profit events.
The first issue with any project of this size is to complete a feasibility study.
|
|
“Palmer is a unique place,” Jansen said. “We want to get people not only to come to Palmer, but to make them realize what a great little community we have here.”
Feasibility studies for projects like this focus on whether people would come to the center and what uses it could sustain, Jansen said. They include what sizes and types of space would work and options for layouts and floor plans.
The city put out a request for proposal to consulting firms for the feasibility study, and Convention Sports and Leisure International, a Minneapolis firm, returned a bid.
“We were thrilled. They are a very reputable firm,” Jansen said. “They are currently under contact in Fairbanks and have done work in Homer and Soldotna.”
The bid came back at about $40,000, and the city asked the council for the funding to sign the contract.
This past week, the council voted four to three in favor of funding the study.
“Right now, it’s a really nebulous concept. It’s hard to say yes or no. The feasibility study will narrow it down,” Council Member Kevin Brown said, one of the four yea votes. “A few years ago, the city of Homer went to them and presented them with ideas similar to ours. The company came back and said no, it wouldn’t be feasible. I like a company that you know will be honest with you.”
Council Member Kathrine Vanover said she’s a big supporter of this project, and it will be nice to finally get some answers.
“Whether it’s feasible or not, we need to find out and move forward,” Vanover said.
Other than the funding for the feasibility study, site selection has been a hurdle for the community center.
The city has its sights on the property now occupied by the derelict Matanuska Maid Creamery. The property is owned by the state Board of Agriculture and Conservation, which valued its worth at about $12.50 per square foot based on an appraisal it got a year ago.
That number was much more than the city thought it was worth, and much more than it is willing to pay.
The city went to the Ag Board and asked for a second appraisal. The board consented, provided the city pay for the appraisal and use a state certified appraiser.
The city’s appraisal came back at $7.75 per square foot, or just shy of $1 million for the whole property, Jansen said.
“That was just on the property itself. The buildings do not have much life left in them. Some have a negative-value effect because you have to demolish them,” Jansen said.
The Ag Board has received the city’s appraisal but has not had a chance to officially review it yet, said board chair Kristan Cole. The fact that it was lower was no surprise, she said, as the market has changed so much in the past year.
“Irrespective of their appraisal, our asset manager made a recommendation to lower the price,” Cole said.
Ag Board asset manager Ray Nix said the property is going back out for sealed bid at the end of the month. As one of the parameters, the board changed the minimum offer to $970,000.
While the city’s number now falls within the board’s price range, Cole said the board is required to do what is in the best interest of the state, the board and the revolving loan fund.
“Are we going to give the city preferential treatment just because they are the city?” Cole said. “No.”
When combined, the two developments — the funding for the feasibility study and a more reasonable price for the land — create one large step forward for the community center. However, the two are not inextricably linked, said Jansen.
“If we can’t get that property, we could find another space downtown. If the center is not feasible, we could find another use of the land,” Jansen said.
Contact Todd L. Disher at todd.disher@frontiersman.com or 352-2252.



Comments
23 comment(s)To Outer Springer Resident wrote on Jul 26, 2009 8:42 AM:
Maryisright wrote on Jul 24, 2009 1:59 PM:
She is absolutly right. Do something useful with that building instead please. "
Outer Springer Resident wrote on Jul 24, 2009 11:47 AM:
Mary wrote on Jul 24, 2009 8:54 AM:
I do not want an anywhere USA town thats all about profit for big box stores and developers. "
mary wrote on Jul 24, 2009 8:42 AM:
As for a sports dome, the one in anchorage is a extreme in size, Wasilla's extreme in cost. There are many middle ground solutions and structures.
The fact is, they are booked with events, kids are active. This is one type of facility that greatly benefits kids, sports, staying active in the valley. "
To Reality Check wrote on Jul 23, 2009 4:35 PM:
brvak wrote on Jul 23, 2009 7:26 AM:
Reality Check wrote on Jul 22, 2009 4:16 PM:
mary again wrote on Jul 22, 2009 3:00 PM:
If the city invests in basic needs for local and a tourist destination, which includes places for kids and teens, it will pay.
Palmer is ripe, its not ruined.
Several things I can think of is, a sports dome - possibly at fairgrounds, a billiards room (No smoking & junior tables), a really good "jungle gym" for tots that has social area / coffee for parents. All of this takes community investment. If the city invests in the arts/convention/town, people will invest in the others. It has to start some where. "
Reality Check wrote on Jul 22, 2009 2:42 PM:
AKGuy wrote on Jul 22, 2009 11:52 AM:
Mary wrote on Jul 21, 2009 1:13 PM:
I agree tuning left out of the springer can be hard at rush hour, but that road is outside of the city hands, that is state. If you really want to make an improvement in the springer area, start proposing some regulations on subdivision developers to include road upgrades for the additional traffic they bring to the area, that way, the developers have to foot some of the bill from the traffic they create.
Do some research & help out. "
JC - Local Citizen wrote on Jul 21, 2009 11:51 AM:
The Mat-Su Valley has wonderful artists in every field imaginable. Theater, pottery, fiber arts, gardening, railroading, etc., etc., etc. Let GROW WITH The IDEA and leave all of your politics out of it.
Take it to the people!
Fairgrounds are a possibility, but those folks are VERY PROTECTIVE of their position in this life - BE Careful! "
palmergirl wrote on Jul 21, 2009 11:51 AM:
Install SIGNALS on Commercial, Inner Springer, and / or on Outer Springer where they meet the Glenn Hwy.
Personally, I think the SAFETY of our people is more important than a museum (even though it might be good in the future).
These signals would be for ALL OF US, not just for the few & tourists.
In a time when money and jobs are at a premium, safety trumps a feasibility study for a convention center. "
Mary wrote on Jul 21, 2009 11:15 AM:
Either that or the borough should offload it to the highest bidder.
Making that building into "something" would greatly improve downtown Palmer. "
mary wrote on Jul 21, 2009 11:10 AM:
Maybe you need to leave the state a while and take a look around, at some nice communities. You too would see the potential Palmer has.
The fairgrounds has its place for many things, but its not a museum, city center convention...Thats like putting Nordstroms in the Carrs plaza. "
Mary wrote on Jul 21, 2009 11:00 AM:
Palmer quit dreaming big dreams?
I lived in Park City when it was a dirt road and no grocery store... I was in Whitefish Mt. when it was a one street town smaller than Palmer 15 years ago. Palmer can dream big, they should. Palmer has so much to offer if they take the direction of the unique, historic development people enjoy to visit. Market the recreational activities....they will come. "
mary wrote on Jul 20, 2009 1:15 PM:
Palmer has several nice hotels and could always build more if needed.
Perhaps they will start realizing the marketing Palmer has for mountain bike riding and skiing, hatcher pass and crevass.
Their are many ways to market Palmer if they keep it a cute town and provide services that are unique. A place to visit. "
Paula wrote on Jul 20, 2009 9:21 AM:
But, since you bring up an art gallery, or museum, if done right, those sound like exciting ideas!
I'm not convinced the State Fair land is available, or the best option until I get more information. I was against the couplet, and tearing out the tracks, but, I think, for once, this could be a wonderful idea.
In any case I am willing to keep an open mind, and to learn more about it. "
allen wrote on Jul 19, 2009 4:12 PM:
Common sense wrote on Jul 19, 2009 10:00 AM:
alaskagirl wrote on Jul 19, 2009 5:21 AM:
The Palmer Couplet was a MAJOR part of this boondoggle.
Palmer doesn't need or want a convention center, museum, or art gallery. We already have the space at the State Fairgrounds, which already has such mundane items as PARKING space.
And now we're spending $40K that could be spent elsewhere.
What a crock. "
Oops wrote on Jul 19, 2009 1:06 AM: