Clunker program isn’t a solution, it’s an aspirin


Published on Monday, August 10, 2009 7:09 PM AKDT

When is a fairly new Jeep Liberty with 50,000 miles on it considered a clunker? It’s barely broken in, at least that would be the thought of many Alaskans who know how to change oil, air filters and tires. The thought of that SUV being squished into a cube of waste is disgusting. And for what? Two miles to the gallon more in a new vehicle?

Cars make a little more sense if they have to achieve 10 miles to the gallon more than their clunker. But why destroy them? If they are truly clunkers, they will eventually die along the road and be hauled off to the junkyard where they will be cannibalized for their parts and eventually crushed as part of the evolution of any vehicle.

For the federal government to put the carrot out in front of people looking for a deal is wrong.

If the government wants to ease air pollution, why not encourage us to drive less, not tell us what we drive?

Let’s say you live 10 miles from where you work, times five days, that’s 100 miles a week round trip. We could generously throw in another 100 miles a week for shopping, entertainment, hauling kids around to school and events. That comes to 200 miles each week, or about 10,000 miles a year.

Then, if you can live with that or similar computation, the government would give you a break on your taxes.

Of course, car companies would hate that because you wouldn’t need — emphasize need  — a new car for  several years. That would mean less cars manufactured. Some companies wouldn’t be able to compete and they would go under. Just like what we’ve seen. Propping up the auto industry is a short-term solution to a long-term problem. We need fewer vehicles on the road, not more fuel-efficient cars on the road. Fuel dependency would drop, traffic fatalities would decrease and maintaining the highways and roads would require less resources.

People liken this economic time to the Great Depression. Not even close.

This has become a nation that won’t give up anything for the common good.

Lastly, there’s a reason so many people drive clunkers.

They can’t afford a better model. Now, with a $3,500 or $4,500 deposit, some will think they can.

Six months from now, who’s going to make those payments?

Uncle Sam won’t. That’s how drug dealers work. The first taste is free.

Comments

12 comment(s)

    Power Wagon wrote on Aug 12, 2009 6:35 PM:

    " Oh, don't worry. That'll come next. The government will decide that it's 'not fair' that the poor don't have nice cars and the taxpayers will foot yet another few billion to buy the 'economically disadvantaged' a brand new car. And it'll be wrapped up under the same old 'it's good for the economy to blow a few million' bunk they always puke out when they want to grab your money. It'll probably be "Bush's fault" that the poor don't have brand new cars, too. "

    Lee Peterson wrote on Aug 12, 2009 12:00 PM:

    " Since we're stuck with this program why not make the "clunkers" available to those who are driving the "rolling wrecks" I see every day? You know, the ones with the blue exhaust, the fenders flapping that without doubt get waaaay worse mileage than the "clunker" just traded in. "

    AK MOM wrote on Aug 12, 2009 9:36 AM:

    " I can't afford a NEW car but I would like to buy one of the clunkers. Why aren't they for sale for the rest of us? Trust me when I say some of the clunkers would be a huge improvement over what I have to drive. "

    Palmer Farm wrote on Aug 12, 2009 9:21 AM:

    " "The only way to get out of a recession is to spend, spend, spend"....(Really? 'Save, save, save' or 'budget, budget, budget' just doesn't work, eh? Good lord!)

    "Try reading the legislation"....(uh, we did. Billions wasted to crush working cars and give handouts. Not to hard to understand..'fool' indeed...)

    "The stimulus bill is intended to stimulate the economy"... (how's that working out?)

    My god...there are honestly sheep so stubborn as to STILL cover their eyes and ears and deny what's right in front of them! "

    Observer wrote on Aug 12, 2009 8:01 AM:

    " Great editorial....and to think it is all being done with BORROWED money. It is small wonder there is a growing sense of raw contempt for Congress. Let's retire the CLUNKER POLITICIANS who voted this in and replace them with new more cost efficient models. "

    Hmm.. wrote on Aug 11, 2009 8:53 PM:

    " You know...There will always be people out there that will abuse the system. There isn't a government program in existence, in any country, that is perfect. The Cash for Clunkers program has been a great success for the most part and has done exactly what it has supposed to: it has encouraged americans to spend money that will filter through a countless number of industries. The only way to move through a recession is to spend, spend, spend. "

    make a difference wrote on Aug 11, 2009 5:32 PM:

    " Make a difference in Washington. Vote out all those up for relection in 2010, all of Congress (senate and house). Go to the polls, make your voice heard America. Remember the Constitution and why it was created. "

    Steve wrote on Aug 11, 2009 2:31 PM:

    " More free money to help an auto industry that in a couple years will be back in the same boat. With GM being owned by the government and labor unions it is doomed to fail, and soon since the government never admits it's mistakes it will probably be owned completely by the government, will only make cars that nobody wants but will sell them at such low prices since they will not need to make a profit, that the others will not be able to compete. Health Care for everyone, and a car in every driveway. "

    CJohnson wrote on Aug 11, 2009 2:30 PM:

    " Sen Begich just wrote me to say cash for clunkers was a very popular program, and will reduce pollution while saving gas, and is saving american jobs. He did not ANSWER my questions: Where do our scrap cars go? How will they get there? Who will recycle and dispose of them? Tires? Fluids? Just where does the scrap go?
    Mr Begich? Hello? Anyone Listening? "

    turk wrote on Aug 11, 2009 1:59 PM:

    " Try reading the legislation. it might help.
    The reason it was in the stimulus bill is it is intended to stimulate the economy. Anyone who buys a jeep libery gets what they deserve. The thing will be dead soon anyway.
    The government is not telling you to do anything, fool. If you want to buy a car and save money here is a chance. "

    Jerry wrote on Aug 10, 2009 8:34 PM:

    " You are right a Jeep with 50,000 miles on it is no clunker. If we don't get rid of most of these clowns in Washington this country is going down the tube. I can't believe how stupid most of them are. "

    khbalaska wrote on Aug 10, 2009 8:04 PM:

    " HEAR! HEAR! "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   




Classifieds




Make Us Your Homepage