The conservative radio talking heads jumped all over the event, calling it indoctrination and worse, referring to the speech as the way Hitler calmed his tribe into a course of hatred.
Comparing the president to Hitler, no matter what side of the fence you feed on, is flat nonsense. Anybody who does should be ashamed, if not in counseling.
|
|
That’s not a bad idea, except it doesn’t give the parents much of a teaching point. The speech is supposedly online for parents to read. After they read it, they can make a reasonable decision about whether they want to hold their students out that day, or just have them excused for study hall or homeroom while the speech is aired.
Then they can discuss with their children why they made the decision they made.
Most Valley schools aren’t pressing the issue either way, and more to the point, many of the schools simply don’t have the technology to provide the speech live.
For those who see nothing wrong with the president speaking to schoolchildren in their classrooms might consider the feelings of the people discussed above. After all, access to what the president thinks and says isn’t exactly hard to find. And if he wanted to speak to the students, all he has to do is create a place on the presidential Web site where students and teachers can access the message at their leisure.
Put it online, Mr. President, and let the students and parents and teachers decide on their own time whether what you have to say is worth reading and teaching.
The president wants to encourage students to get serious about education. This from his press secretary Robert Gibbs:
“I think we’ve reached a little bit of the silly season when the president of the United States can’t tell kids in school to study hard and stay in school.”
See, that’s the irony here.
The students who might see the speech are in school like he wants them to be. The ones who need to hear it most, aren’t.
And there’s this: If the message is for students to work hard in school and attend regularly, why is he interrupting their school day to encourage them to do those things they are already doing?


Comments
174 comment(s)to Katie wrote on Sep 26, 2009 5:01 PM:
Palmer Farm wrote on Sep 25, 2009 4:52 PM:
Katie wrote on Sep 25, 2009 11:28 AM:
Power Wagon wrote on Sep 25, 2009 9:08 AM:
MAXKATT from NY wrote on Sep 25, 2009 6:24 AM:
Independents clone wrote on Sep 24, 2009 9:59 PM:
Independent wrote on Sep 24, 2009 5:34 PM:
I wonder how many other responders who don't worship at the altar of bad Republican presidents have been axed.
Shameful.
Maybe when The Frontiersman folds you can get a job interning at Fox, or picking up prescriptions for Limbaugh.
Think I'll move along to the more fair-minded, and popular ADN blog, and leave this for narrow-minded tiny towners. "
Fruit Loop wrote on Sep 24, 2009 4:57 PM:
say what wrote on Sep 24, 2009 4:56 PM:
LOL..yes, or the former attorney-turned-judge who was the principal partner with the Clintons during Whitewater who committed suicide by jumping in front of a bus. Or his secretary that survived a plane crash, helped others on the ground, then died in the helicopter due to a deep laceration of one of her main arteries. (Amazing she was able to help walk on it for TWO HOURS before succumbing, eh?)
Yeah, Democrats are awesome.... "
jp to say what wrote on Sep 24, 2009 4:08 PM:
even the guy in protective custody wound up dead.
But Hillary had nothing to do with any of it! lol yeah, okay! "
jp wrote on Sep 24, 2009 2:02 PM:
So much has happened that is wrong with his administration Qadaffi calls him "Son"
Got to wonder if he is a terrorist! "
say what wrote on Sep 24, 2009 10:18 AM:
Independent wrote on Sep 23, 2009 5:58 PM:
To compare Obama's measly nine-months in office to eight years of Nancy and Ronnie tells me everything I need to know about your level of intelligence.
Pick a fight with someone your own age. With whatever due respect, I'm too mature for you. "
Palmer Farm wrote on Sep 23, 2009 4:21 PM:
watcher wrote on Sep 23, 2009 8:54 AM:
watcher wrote on Sep 23, 2009 8:46 AM:
" don't indulge thier silly attempt to remove the focus from their inability to continue defending this joke of a "President"
Chicago to LIttlebird wrote on Sep 22, 2009 2:58 PM:
" The "joke" of a president and his "corrupt lackeys" (see Cheney, Limbaugh, Coulter, Hughes, Hannity, O'Reilly et al) left office last January.
Chicago to Littlebird wrote on Sep 22, 2009 5:25 PM
"Nowhere did I state that Bush was bad therefore Obama is good "
OOPS! "
jp wrote on Sep 23, 2009 8:39 AM:
Obama and his address to the general assembly today was a slap in the face to everyone in the U.S., and every other country in the world. I guess we are all just supposed to bow and kiss the Royal feet of the supreme being known as "The Obama"
Qadafi was a more accurate speaker, and i believe him over Obama.
When will Obamas arrogance cost even more of our countrymen/women's lives? "
Independent wrote on Sep 22, 2009 5:54 PM:
What part of 'per 100,000' don't you understand? The base variables are per percentage of population. To suggest because Alaska's so under-populated the variables should change is beyond ludicrous.
They say denial's part of addiction; I suspect you're in denial about factual statistics because of your own troubles.
BTW, I for one do think Obama's great...lord knows Bush was bad (both of them), Reagan was bad (yeah--both of 'em, if Ronnie's Cabinet's telling the truth), Nixon--oh, please... I don't think my generation's seen a good Republican president yet. "
jp wrote on Sep 22, 2009 5:47 PM:
If you can't see the blatant fiscal stupidity going on you must be blind.
Today the government let AIG off without having to pay back bailout money. isn't that aaawesome?
but! tha recession is over because they said so!
keep drinking the koolaid! "
Chicago to Littlebird wrote on Sep 22, 2009 5:25 PM:
Littlebird wrote on Sep 22, 2009 4:26 PM:
Chicago to LIttlebird wrote on Sep 22, 2009 2:58 PM:
ps: the only reason the drug/substance abuse stuff came up is because the locals kept saying that those who disagreed with them should, "take your meds", or "take your pills." "
Chicago to jp wrote on Sep 22, 2009 1:02 PM:
Littlebird wrote on Sep 22, 2009 12:57 PM:
Power Wagon wrote on Sep 22, 2009 11:50 AM:
Droning on in a condescending attitude to others is funny considering you have yet to demonstrate the ability to follow along! You can spout percentages all day long...doesn't change the fact that California has more drug addicts than the entire population of Alaska! (As does New York, New Jersey, Washington, Louisiana, etc etc) Using percentages for states like Alaska, the Dakotas, Wyoming when comparing them to other states is just dumb! "
sharpie wrote on Sep 22, 2009 10:42 AM:
Simple point; If I say "50% of the people in location A are alcoholics compared to 10% of location B, but location A has 2 people and location B has 10,000"...hardly a conclusive study.
Now that I've thoroughly confused your closed mind, shall you continue to parrot your failed point? "
jp wrote on Sep 22, 2009 8:16 AM:
That's it!!!!! he's Nancy Pelosi!!! "
Independent to sharpie wrote on Sep 22, 2009 3:01 AM:
Appararently, none of it.
You might want to consider a course in Statistics. You have heard of college, right?
You don't sound too "sharpie" to me.
Next time: think first; react last. "
Independent to say what wrote on Sep 21, 2009 4:52 PM:
You must be a Republican. "
sharpie wrote on Sep 21, 2009 4:43 PM:
That's...let's see....4 times by my count that somebody has tried to explain the folly of comparing percentages to hard numbers when it comes to a state with the 2nd smallest population in the US vs. the rest of the nation. Yet, you can't seem to grasp the concept. Don't know what more somebody can do to help you understand. This site doesn't allow stick-figure drawings with arrows and tutorial videos. "
say what wrote on Sep 21, 2009 3:31 PM:
Chicago to jp wrote on Sep 21, 2009 3:15 PM:
Oh, and here is a question that you and only you can answer. Does stupid hurt? Seriously, are you in pain? HAHA HAHA. Seeya Doof. :P "
Independent wrote on Sep 21, 2009 3:12 PM:
Alaska’s suicide rate is 20.9 per every 100,000 residents, almost twice the national average of 10.6 for every 100,000; and, Alaska Natives' suicide rates are nearly four times the national average. Alaskan males commit 86% of suicides.
Alaska tops out internationally as well.
Get your facts straight--and get off the dope. Had you followed the discussion here, you'd know why this came up in the first place--it started with some right wing whackos and their drug obsession. Bet your illiteracy rate's pretty high, too. "
jp wrote on Sep 21, 2009 8:36 AM:
"Talk about one sided" "
Independents buddy wrote on Sep 21, 2009 8:30 AM:
I want to keep this drug subject going as long as possible in order to divert attention away from the fact that I can't debate this article or the points made by others. ("Facts" throw me for a loop, what can I say?) But even at that, you can clearly see that I have no comprehension of the law or reality and am not smart enough to look it up. So please indulge me as I continue to squawk and ramble on cluelessly. "
Palmer Farm wrote on Sep 20, 2009 8:40 PM:
2) Interesting debate. When do the "my dad is bigger than your dad" and "nanny nanny boo-boo"s start? "
Independent wrote on Sep 20, 2009 8:32 AM:
The blogger under the name 'to independent' provides zero evidence that Alaska's marijuana laws past/present haven't been the most liberal in the entire nation.
If you want to get your unparalleled suicide rates under control, you may want to look at your drug problems there. The two typically go hand-in-hand.
Good luck to you--you'll need it. "
Independent to Chicago wrote on Sep 20, 2009 7:46 AM:
The Republican party cannot control their rabid, right-wing terrorists---aka popularly 'the American Taliban'--under the dictatorship of Limbaugh, Beck, Palin et al. With increasing frustration the true-blue GOP's joining ranks with Independents (like me) and even the Democrats, to get away from the terrorist's raunchy smell and unpatriotic behavior.
Knee deep in lunancy, these whackos believe they can blend violence, paranoia, and propaganda with extreme Christianity--into a twisted version of democracy, that looks more like Middle East extremism by the day.
Let's not go there. "
Littlebird wrote on Sep 20, 2009 1:30 AM:
Chicago wrote on Sep 19, 2009 5:19 PM:
As far as my comments about you, it is merely a taste back of your own medicine. Good luck my bitter little boys. "
jp to Chicago wrote on Sep 19, 2009 2:35 PM:
say what wrote on Sep 19, 2009 11:26 AM:
The opportunities for a laugh are indeed endless with this guy! And you're right, you can ALMOST feel sorry for him! "
Chicago to jp watcher wrote on Sep 18, 2009 6:10 PM:
watcher wrote on Sep 18, 2009 2:43 PM:
jp wrote on Sep 18, 2009 12:00 PM:
sharpie wrote on Sep 18, 2009 9:56 AM:
Alaska natives get far larger dividends and benefits from the oil money than other Alaska residents. They spent nothing in surveying, construction or extraction costs. So please tell me why they should get the entire amount? And how would it be beneficial for so few people to get that gargantuan of an amount while the rest of the state would have to tax the heck out of everything to make up the difference? "
to independent wrote on Sep 18, 2009 9:53 AM:
2bornot2b wrote on Sep 18, 2009 7:44 AM:
Chicago to Sharpie jp Power Tool and the rest of the bottom feeders wrote on Sep 18, 2009 5:55 AM:
You all live by one simple paradigm. "I am right, you are wrong, therefore let me show you how stupid you are before you hurt yourself." You quote the press when it suits you, slam them when it doesn't. You joke about substance abuse. And then the grand daddy of them all. Take the goverment for everything you can but claim you are anti-goverment in the next breath. A bunch of ridiculous hypocrites is what you are. LOL "
Remember When wrote on Sep 17, 2009 8:15 PM:
Hybrid wrote on Sep 17, 2009 7:48 PM:
It's not about definitions. It's about
how this specific payment/handout/welfare check has undermined the can-do spirit and self-reliant nature that used to characterize Alaskans. A Valley teacher told me that the kids today have no goals because everything is given to them; they have money (PFD), drugs, sex, all the toys that PFD can buy, and they don't have to pay room and board. Whatever happened to saving up for that 4wheeler? Not all the kids are slugs; there are many fine Valley grads, but his point is valid. What don't you understand about this problem? "
jp to hybrid wrote on Sep 17, 2009 5:30 PM:
in all actuality, the dividends from the oil should go to the rightful owners of Alaska, The Natives of Alaska!
Truth be told, Alaska was not Russias to sell, and the money paid to russia never got there. it was "some Deal" i'm amazed Obama and Pelosi weren't responsible for that! "
Independent wrote on Sep 17, 2009 5:27 PM:
No other state in the union's allowed for such a high level of decriminalization of drugs.
My understanding's Palin's openly admitted enjoying her share of the stuff. Obama's judged differently, of course--by hypocrites.
If laws've changed, it doesn't alter the fact that an overwhelmingly Conservative, unwholesome, sad Alaska adds to its own drug problems.
You can't rationally blame the Demcrats. "
watcher wrote on Sep 17, 2009 4:46 PM:
ALL states impose taxes on various forms of industry and then use that money how they see fit. Hawaii makes money from tourism, Washington has wheat, apples, tech, Florida has tourism and oranges etc etc. Alaska taxes its oil BUT...instead of using ALL of it how it sees fit, it gives a portion of it back to the citizens to spend how THEY see fit. EITHER way, state taxes are being collected and spent. So please, would the uneducated/ignorant please tell us how that amounts to a 'handout'? "
Hybird wrote on Sep 17, 2009 3:11 PM:
If you don't consider the PFD a "handout" and "welfare", then how come Alaska was a better place before the state started dishing out all the free bucks? I'll tell you why--because the PFD IS welfare and it has caused all the usual common side effects of non-specific welfare ( i.e., free money)--dependence on the system, degradation of morals and self respect, weakness of spirit, free loaders swarming in, etc. For 30 years, Alaska's children have been spoiled rotten by the PFD. Now look at the results. It's sickening. "
Hybrid wrote on Sep 17, 2009 2:55 PM:
I'll say Alaska has a welfare problem--it's called the PFD! Alaska was a great place before all those free loading white trash bums arrived to turn the place into a living H---.
And in spite of your wildest imaginings and for all your blusterings and hot air, it is certainly not the liberals who are the druggies and the welfare recipients. Drug users probably don't even vote.
Get rid of the PFD and you get rid of most of the problems. Alaska used to be a great place. Not anymore. It's a tragedy. "
Littlebird wrote on Sep 17, 2009 2:40 PM:
jp to independent wrote on Sep 17, 2009 2:18 PM:
then you'll call me a racist.
But it was OK that pelosi had illegal aliens on her vinyard, and the kennedy's had them as well, but they're all "OK" because they're Dems ?
ah, go praise your illustrious demigods in congress. "
oops wrote on Sep 17, 2009 2:03 PM:
sharpie wrote on Sep 17, 2009 2:00 PM:
Notice that the intellect confuses the PFD tax system with a 'handout' too. I guess it gets confusing when the government doesn't keep all the money they collect and choose how best to spend it for you. Not enough government in the equation, you see. "
Independent wrote on Sep 17, 2009 1:47 PM:
jp's desperate assertion that a bunch of liberals came up there and ruined it all is hysterically ludicrous.
Marijuana was legalized in Alaska by a bunch of libertarians and Republicans--not Democrats.
Such a sad, dark place, really. I feel badly for Alaska's Independents and Democrats. They must feel so outta step amid the unwholesome whackos. "
Chicago to Power Tool wrote on Sep 17, 2009 1:18 PM:
Power Wagon wrote on Sep 17, 2009 11:08 AM:
Now that we've had our fun changing the subject (whacko libbies have to do that. Facts aren't their strong suit)...LOVE the posts from "Independent"! You can almost see the glazed eyes and constant look of confusion! LOL "
jp wrote on Sep 17, 2009 9:50 AM:
Chicago wrote on Sep 16, 2009 5:29 PM:
Independent wrote on Sep 16, 2009 4:02 PM:
I guess you totally missed my point that Lincoln would switch from Republican to Democrat were he alive today. So much for your reading and comprehension skills.
Been living out in the country a long time? "
say what wrote on Sep 16, 2009 3:28 PM:
Independents buddy wrote on Sep 16, 2009 1:40 PM:
Chicago to Independent wrote on Sep 16, 2009 12:58 PM:
Well said. "
Independent wrote on Sep 16, 2009 2:25 AM:
So busy accusing Obama of socialism--yet, no Republican has even identified to which of the dozens of forms of socialism Obama supposedly subscribes. Too lazy; too stupid.
I've no doubt if Abraham Lincoln were alive today, he'd switch to the Democrat party. He died believing this country's white trash had been brought to heel.
Tragic. "
TG wrote on Sep 16, 2009 12:18 AM:
Suzy Q wrote on Sep 16, 2009 12:11 AM:
" Read back through this thread. What do you see? Those oppsoing Obama offer no alternatives, no original thoughts. They spout hate in language borrowed from their true leaders -- entertainers like Limbaugh and Beck. This is why the republican party is hollow and shallow and gasping for breath. Hatred is not an American or family value, and your words are hateful. I feel very sorry for anybody who thinks this way. You are to be pitied, and a little feared. What will yo do when your words don't get results? "
Logic wrote on Sep 15, 2009 5:44 PM:
jp wrote on Sep 15, 2009 5:31 PM:
it's time to move forward on removing him. "
Palmer Farm wrote on Sep 15, 2009 4:57 PM:
"Obama is great! Prophet Obama will fix all that ails us with massive over-spending!"....good lord... "
Power Wagon wrote on Sep 15, 2009 3:08 PM:
Hey Littlebird and jp from Dear Sharpie wrote on Sep 15, 2009 12:44 PM:
jp -- huh?
The rest of you blind Obama-bashers -- hatred will burn out your soul. Try to approach all things with love. Even if you have no love to give, the act of trying may create it. You might even try loving your country.
Save your replies for the echo chamber of the AM radio. I won't be reading it. "
Logic. wrote on Sep 15, 2009 10:11 AM:
Littlebird wrote on Sep 15, 2009 8:45 AM:
jp to Hey Sharpie wrote on Sep 15, 2009 8:01 AM:
Perhaps you should start with Sesame Street. "
Dear Watcher wrote on Sep 15, 2009 7:34 AM:
As to the education barb, I suggest you investigate the well-established correlation between education level and placement on the political spectrum.
Oh -- and to really make your point in the next post, you might try all caps, and inserting an exclamation point or two between every letter. I don't think your recent effort really sufficiently imparts conveys your personality or superior education. "
watcher wrote on Sep 14, 2009 9:29 PM:
...hooooh boy....go get an education and try again later! LOL! "
Hey Sharpie wrote on Sep 14, 2009 8:10 PM:
And bravo for your anti-government stand. I assume you'll be rejecting your PFD then? Refusing to drive on roads? Declining police protection when the time comes? No? Then shut up. "
sharpie wrote on Sep 14, 2009 7:25 PM:
jp wrote on Sep 14, 2009 7:22 PM:
One person, One Vote!
and about all the healthcare hooey, put it to the voters on the basis of ; one person, one vote !
if you pick on a christian, that's ok, but you had never better pick on a muslim, that's intolerable!!!
got to love the double standards!
that's why I pick on both groups with equal lattitude! ........they're all sheep! "
Lisnup wrote on Sep 14, 2009 4:22 PM:
Only a nut job like yourself would have time to play your sick humor to appease your agenda, Yah we know you're trying be funny, do you get tickled at yourself winking in the mirror talking Allah and Obama in the same sentence? Don't forget to watch FOX News before you go to bed "
Palmer Farm wrote on Sep 14, 2009 4:22 PM:
jp wrote on Sep 14, 2009 2:32 PM:
you didn't hear that?
lol "
To Take Longer... wrote on Sep 14, 2009 1:28 PM:
The guide DID accompany it. They changed one little sentence in the lesson plan in an ill-advised attempt to appease nut-jobs like yourself. I would have left it as it was because only those most intent on willful ignorance could have seen it as anything but positive and appropriate. They tried to address the concerns expressed, and got even more grief for it. Hopefully they've learned that your kind has no desire for real dialogue. "
to take an hour wrote on Sep 14, 2009 12:51 PM:
Logic. wrote on Sep 14, 2009 10:06 AM:
take longer than a second wrote on Sep 14, 2009 9:40 AM:
CORRECT! I was responding to somebody ELSE in here, not your blog! Now what was it you were saying about "babbling"? Ouch, huh? That's called 'irony'! Bitter, isn't it? But as far as Komrade Chairman's little speech...it went much better without the initially-planned accompanying brainwashing guide they wanted to send along with it, didn't it? "
Uncle Jed wrote on Sep 14, 2009 4:17 AM:
Logic. wrote on Sep 13, 2009 11:13 PM:
You need to take your own advise, read the news story first. Then post a comment. You are babbling on about some other news story you've read somewhere at some other time. All that babble you just spewed had nothing absolutely nothing to do with The Presidents Stay In School Speech. But hey it ain't personnel. Hello Dolly. "
Take an hour -- whatever you need wrote on Sep 13, 2009 9:50 PM:
Please look up socialism so you can use the word properly in the future. Please try to think in some way that doesn't demand exclamation marks. Please consider a return to reason untainted by abject fear or closet racism.
You are an embarassment to America and Alaska. "
to Logic-less wrote on Sep 13, 2009 9:38 PM:
Take longer than a second wrote on Sep 13, 2009 7:03 PM:
Logic. wrote on Sep 13, 2009 6:48 PM:
and for the big finish... wrote on Sep 13, 2009 4:33 PM:
As far as "oh gee, where would we get the money?" I guess the PROVEN method of letting the citizens keep thier money to increase spending is baffling to sheep! Nope! Better for the government to spend what it has and DOESN'T have on kayak trips, grape research, Cash for Clunkers (Japan thanks you!) etc! HA! "
toLogic wrote on Sep 13, 2009 11:44 AM:
Take a Second wrote on Sep 13, 2009 9:26 AM:
Oops wrote on Sep 13, 2009 7:11 AM:
So who are Republicans looking up to? who can they trust? If you eliminate the adulterers, liars and cheats well, we're waiting., show me the money!!! Much is prejudice, fear Obama will succeed without their imput. "
Lisnup wrote on Sep 13, 2009 5:20 AM:
You're so prejudice it's sickening. Pray your insurance company doesn't drop you and you become ill. "
Tim from lower 48 wrote on Sep 12, 2009 11:41 PM:
and thank you... wrote on Sep 12, 2009 7:38 PM:
Lisnup wrote on Sep 12, 2009 6:43 PM:
to Dim American wrote on Sep 12, 2009 2:35 PM:
Great American wrote on Sep 12, 2009 11:55 AM:
Proud Amerikan wrote on Sep 12, 2009 11:45 AM:
(oh, by the way,...it's spelled "destruction")
TTOSBT: The "lies" of the past years made you a Democrat? So what do the current lies make you? A socialist or just naive? "
Logic. wrote on Sep 12, 2009 10:12 AM:
2bornot2b wrote on Sep 12, 2009 9:26 AM:
Proud American wrote on Sep 12, 2009 12:23 AM:
I would be proud for any president of the United states to speak to our kids and encourage out kids to stay in school!
Shameful is the heart fill with hate- shameful is those bent on distruction-Shameful are those who lie!! "
America anyone wrote on Sep 11, 2009 10:08 PM:
danb wrote on Sep 11, 2009 9:47 PM:
TTOSBT wrote on Sep 11, 2009 8:14 PM:
Palmer Farm wrote on Sep 11, 2009 5:01 PM:
to great american wrote on Sep 11, 2009 4:25 PM:
OReally wrote on Sep 11, 2009 3:54 PM:
to observer wrote on Sep 11, 2009 1:48 PM:
great american wrote on Sep 11, 2009 12:59 PM:
jp wrote on Sep 11, 2009 12:16 PM:
Cheat the working class, and give all the criminals a pass!!!! "
Observer to the libs wrote on Sep 11, 2009 11:16 AM:
lauras pal wrote on Sep 11, 2009 8:51 AM:
OReally wrote on Sep 11, 2009 5:47 AM:
" I do not consider Barack Hussein Obama a good role model for my kids and do not intend to have my kids exposed to him in the public schools. That is the way it is no if ands or buts. Do I make myself clear to all you foggy minded liberal/socialists? "
We see your ignorance clearly, you have the same bullying tactics as the ole Ex-Quitter, too bad. "
laura wrote on Sep 10, 2009 9:52 PM:
just call me socialist wrote on Sep 10, 2009 9:11 PM:
Dear OReally wrote on Sep 10, 2009 1:40 PM:
My second question was about the lesson plan, but only wondering what, specifically, was being objected to. I've read it, and found it pretty innocuous.
It's hard not respond to your incivility, but I'm not going to. Perhaps if I raise my half of this discourse, others will follow. "
To Observer wrote on Sep 10, 2009 9:51 AM:
If it's the man himself, please explain that too. "
OReally wrote on Sep 10, 2009 8:51 AM:
sharpie wrote on Sep 10, 2009 8:23 AM:
I'll beat Littlebird to the punch on that one, since this is just to easy. What more 'proof' do you need beyond what was released to the press last week? I'll say again; what more proof do you need beyond what was RELEASED BY THE WHITE HOUSE to the press last week?! Good God man, if you're not going to follow along or even pay attention to what's happening then butt out and don't make such a fool out of yourself so publicly!!! "
Observer wrote on Sep 10, 2009 6:25 AM:
O.K. Ill Bite wrote on Sep 10, 2009 12:16 AM:
2bornot2b wrote on Sep 9, 2009 7:20 PM:
jp to 2bornot2b wrote on Sep 9, 2009 4:17 PM:
i hardly even have to cut/paste any of it!
the nations morning radio shows have enough quality content of that one speech for the remaining 3.25 years of his administration! "
Littlebird wrote on Sep 9, 2009 4:10 PM:
2bornot2b wrote on Sep 9, 2009 3:25 PM:
Watchee wrote on Sep 9, 2009 1:52 PM:
It's understandable that in the absence of proof you must attack me. However if this nation is ever to return to greatness, it will be on the basis of rational, open discourse. Try it. You might like it. "
watcher wrote on Sep 9, 2009 12:49 PM:
jp wrote on Sep 9, 2009 12:42 PM:
" you could be a doctor, a lawyer, a wall street banker, but that's probably not going to happen, because you're stupid"
i laughed me self aboot oot of air!!!!!
perhaps the most honest speech he's made to date! "
Just One wrote on Sep 9, 2009 11:11 AM:
wrong wrote on Sep 9, 2009 8:08 AM:
Katie wrote on Sep 9, 2009 4:55 AM:
Tim from lower 48 wrote on Sep 9, 2009 1:50 AM:
Big Lake 13 wrote on Sep 8, 2009 11:36 PM:
Former President Bush 1 also gave a speech. The next day it made front-page news, caused an investigation to spending tax dollars in lean times, using children and political power. The content of their speeches were pretty much the same. The difference is Democrat President or Republican President. Did Former President Bush 1 also publish a lesson book for teachers? What was the total cost for each of? "
Please Again wrote on Sep 8, 2009 6:07 PM:
"Power Wagon": more plainly for you: when our enemies see that we will attack our President for political spite, they respect us less and grow bold. We lose stature and stature is strength. "
Palmer Farm wrote on Sep 8, 2009 3:01 PM:
watcher wrote on Sep 8, 2009 2:43 PM:
I like the 'predicted in my message' part. Like a Crazy 8-ball or something. But it's the rest of this goofy blathering that proves everybody else's point. LOL "
to Katie wrote on Sep 8, 2009 2:25 PM:
Power Wagon wrote on Sep 8, 2009 2:07 PM:
Then turns around and says " I didn't say that questioning Obama strengthens our enemies."
Huh. O-kay.... (?) "
Katie wrote on Sep 8, 2009 11:37 AM:
Dear Palmer Farm wrote on Sep 8, 2009 11:04 AM:
Rather, I said that the pitiful display of ignorance (typified by your silly screed, and predicted in my message) presents a weakened America to the rest of the world.
Your inability to read my message through anything but your Beck/Salt Lake goggles proves my point. "
Jim from Boston wrote on Sep 8, 2009 10:37 AM:
I have to thank the right wing for alerting us to this insidious message. Absolutely the LAST thing I want being said in our public schools.
What's the right afraid of? Kids are going to get subliminal messages to volunteer with A.C.O.R.N. as FEMA camp guards? "
Palmer Farm wrote on Sep 8, 2009 9:36 AM:
Yes, how dare anybody question our glorious leader! The ignorance of Americans to question authority or the Supreme Leader! It only strengthens our enemies when we question our leaders!
What country are you from? You sound like a member of the former Soviet Union Communist Party! Whatever happened to all the "Dissent is Patriotic" stickers liberals were pasting all over thier cars during the last administration? That changes now that Comrade Obama is in power? Seems to me that NOT questioning what our government is doing strengthens our enemies. "
MAXKATT from NY wrote on Sep 8, 2009 6:41 AM:
Karin wrote on Sep 8, 2009 4:57 AM:
Our kids are not stupid, they are going to figure out that the American Dream came to end at the turn of the century and they will know that the lies in the media don't add up. They will also know who is trying to keep them dumb and poor. Not Obama. "
Shameful wrote on Sep 7, 2009 8:01 PM:
Please wrote on Sep 7, 2009 7:38 PM:
Now, you respond by labeling me.
Ready, set, GO on with your illogical attacks. In the end, hopefully soon, reasonable discourse will retake the initiative in this country, and your hysterical, fearful voices will, mercifully, fade away. "
GAG ME wrote on Sep 7, 2009 5:14 PM:
Americans for an Educated Public wrote on Sep 7, 2009 3:31 PM:
TTOSBT wrote on Sep 7, 2009 3:10 PM:
Karin wrote on Sep 7, 2009 2:32 PM:
to hypocrasy reigns wrote on Sep 7, 2009 12:37 PM:
That's funny. Too bad hypocrisy is a hallmark of liberalism. I especially like the part about "there's no reason to oppose the President" part. You can almost see the big red star behind a sentiment like that. Thank God there's still free-thinking Americans that object to the part about the initial intended speech with all that "why I love Obama" brainwashing crap! "Opposition for opposition sake" indeed. People like you that are easily blinded to the reality of the situation are why we're in this mess. "
point of view wrote on Sep 7, 2009 9:49 AM:
Hypocrasy Reigns wrote on Sep 7, 2009 7:42 AM:
GAG ME wrote on Sep 6, 2009 10:58 PM:
to TTOSBT wrote on Sep 6, 2009 8:08 PM:
TTOSBT wrote on Sep 6, 2009 7:06 PM:
watcher wrote on Sep 6, 2009 12:52 PM:
Steve wrote on Sep 6, 2009 10:34 AM:
Littlebird wrote on Sep 6, 2009 9:53 AM:
Dennis wrote on Sep 6, 2009 6:52 AM:
Wait til the issue is over then address the kids. "
Dennis wrote on Sep 6, 2009 6:33 AM:
great minds think alike wrote on Sep 5, 2009 11:41 PM:
no fear wrote on Sep 5, 2009 10:49 PM: