The chamber’s announcement comes after the city completed a financial report of how the chamber spent the $100,000 grant it received in 2007. The report found, according to the statement, “disbursements ... outside the scope of the contract.”
Board member Dave Baker said the chamber welcomed the city’s report.
|
|
The two-year contract was to support the chamber in three areas of its Wasilla Tourism/Vistors Bureau: general tourism promotion, convention and meeting development, and special events promotion.
Per the terms of the contract, no more than 25 percent of the money was to go to chamber personnel salaries and benefits. Upgrades and maintenance to the chamber building were not to be done with grant money. No more than 10 percent of the grant was to go to dues, memberships, personal expenses, travel or trade show and convention fees. The chamber could not make capital purchases with the grant money unless what was purchased was used only for tourism bureau business.
For the report, the financial contractor focused on 68 transactions totaling more than $36,000 that seemed to fall into the restricted categories. From that, more than $15,000 appeared out of compliance with the contract, what Wasilla mayor Verne Rupright called “improprieties.”
In going through the report, the amount spent on travel, memberships and convention fees exceeded the allowance of the contract by more than $2,600. It appears money from the grant was used for utilities, expenses and building improvements expressly prohibited by the contract. More than $3,600 lacked sufficient supporting documents to determine if it was spent properly.
“We were required to have accounting for each expenditure,” Baker said. “It really wasn’t so much spending above and beyond as it was having the proper receipts.”
The city also asked the chamber to return the $12,500 raise given to the past executive director, Cheryl Metiva, from the grant money, and another $3,000 in back payroll taxes.
“We did not contest that,” Baker said.
While the chamber was able to present documentation clearing some of the minor charges, they agreed to repay $29,126.45, Baker said.
The chamber, which has long been in a financial trouble, has agreed to pay back the questionable expenditures over three years, Baker said. However, instead of demanding cash payments, the city asked if the chamber would be willing to work off their debt by taking over certain community events, Baker said.
In the past, the chamber ran the fireworks shows on New Year’s and the Fourth of July, as well as the Fourth of July parade, Rupright said. Under previous administrations, the city started paying for these annual events, he said.
By giving those responsibilities back, the city will save its own money while not limiting the chamber’s ability to operate, Rupright said.
“The chamber is an integral part of our community,” Rupright said. “Instead of going into a repayment plan that would strap them into a three-year debt obligation, let’s move it back to the way it was.”
Baker said the board has not discussed taking action against Metiva for mishandling the money, or asking her to return the $12,500 in compensation. With chamber elections Thursday, that will be for the new board to decide, he said.
Contact Todd L. Disher at todd.disher@frontiersman.com or 352-2252.

Comments
62 comment(s)TOCorrection Please wrote wrote on Oct 24, 2009 11:02 PM:
Both organizations eventually questioned Metiva's accountability and found her abusing both grant expenditures and chamber earnings.
After the fact, yes, but the findings are real. Mrs. Metiva can not be trusted and to date has no remorse. "
Correction Please wrote on Oct 24, 2009 4:29 PM:
To Rusty wrote on Oct 24, 2009 9:58 AM:
All employee stealing happens because of lack of oversight or the opportunity doesn't exist. This is not a new crime.
It's personal when an employee steals our non-profit money. "
Rusty wrote on Oct 22, 2009 9:32 AM:
to Didnt ponder quite long enough wrote on Oct 21, 2009 9:32 AM:
Still waiting. wrote on Oct 20, 2009 5:55 PM:
Another Way wrote on Oct 19, 2009 10:46 PM:
Didnt ponder quite long enough wrote on Oct 19, 2009 6:04 PM:
Audit will Bring Fioreworks wrote on Oct 19, 2009 12:42 PM:
Agree with them wrote on Oct 17, 2009 8:59 PM:
Something to ponder wrote on Oct 17, 2009 10:57 AM:
Quarterback fumble interception wrote on Oct 16, 2009 3:22 PM:
The only ones having a good time were the Metiva's dining out everyday, massages, manicures, travel and clothes, all at the expense of hard working businesses struggling to survive.
She manipulated everyone. Blaming the board is ignorant, she was in charge of the daily operation of the Chamber and responsible to report accurately. It's easy to hide things you don't want others to see...but only for awhile,eventually it all catches up. "
Monday Morning Quarterback wrote on Oct 15, 2009 3:04 PM:
They are Back hide your check book wrote on Oct 15, 2009 5:53 AM:
Who is going to pay wrote on Oct 14, 2009 10:40 AM:
Ran out wrote on Oct 12, 2009 5:12 PM:
Wave to traffic wrote on Oct 12, 2009 4:05 PM:
to Bored wrote on Oct 12, 2009 10:26 AM:
Klapperich believes in Metiva, obviously, and happens to be involved with a radio station- don't lose sleep over this. He's a Wasilla supporter doing what he feels is right. After the dust settles, he'll see clearly. Your choice to listen or not. "
My Bad wrote on Oct 12, 2009 10:19 AM:
rambling mumble wrote on Oct 12, 2009 8:57 AM:
Bored wrote on Oct 11, 2009 5:33 PM:
Vote board members wisely wrote on Oct 11, 2009 4:49 PM:
about time wrote on Oct 11, 2009 4:43 PM:
KTUU interviews wrote on Oct 11, 2009 2:58 PM:
"But I am absolutely certain the board approved it. I'm certain that the president, Jason Hamlin, approved it," said former chamber president John Klapperich. "And I am certain it had gone back to city council, reviewed and also approved."
Cheryl Metiva did receive a reprimand for that action. Then came knight "Marty" to her rescue, he promptly called Jason with some not so nice comments. You know, the kind we all heard him use in the not so recent past on KTUU. Sad but true. "
Shame on Metiva wrote on Oct 11, 2009 11:40 AM:
Addition or subtraction wrote on Oct 11, 2009 7:49 AM:
Sorry Memtoo wrote on Oct 11, 2009 7:38 AM:
Hear Ye Hear Ye wrote on Oct 11, 2009 12:18 AM:
Not quite wrote on Oct 10, 2009 1:13 PM:
Memtoo wrote on Oct 10, 2009 12:53 PM:
Jrmem wrote on Oct 10, 2009 10:50 AM:
Uh-oh IFOT wrote on Oct 10, 2009 9:15 AM:
I, too, wish "newcomer" a speedy exit back to Anchorage. No problems there??
Buh-bye! "
To Hmmmmm wrote on Oct 10, 2009 8:35 AM:
To The newcomer wrote on Oct 10, 2009 8:32 AM:
To Remember wrote on Oct 10, 2009 8:24 AM:
Hmmm wrote on Oct 10, 2009 7:18 AM:
We all were taken. wrote on Oct 9, 2009 10:58 PM:
Remember wrote on Oct 9, 2009 6:40 PM:
Mewmber55 wrote on Oct 9, 2009 5:27 PM:
Responding to newcomer wrote on Oct 9, 2009 5:24 PM:
Missed the Point wrote on Oct 9, 2009 3:46 PM:
Wait for it wrote on Oct 9, 2009 3:23 PM:
Support the new board and help them come to the right decision. "
to Cortez- OMG wrote on Oct 9, 2009 3:04 PM:
Trust in the system wrote on Oct 9, 2009 2:58 PM:
They questioned Bill Allen's expenditures, information was shared and the public had a right to access- not an issue. Here, Cheryl has no grounds to stand on.
Trust that the chamber will follow through and hold her accountable. It's not pretty, it's not fun, but the chamber will get through it and Cheryl will be treated appropriately. "
Accountability wrote on Oct 9, 2009 2:40 PM:
Cortez wrote on Oct 9, 2009 2:21 PM:
wake up wrote on Oct 9, 2009 1:27 PM:
Increase needs a memory boost wrote on Oct 9, 2009 11:12 AM:
Missed the Point wrote on Oct 9, 2009 11:07 AM:
Sounds like the City did the honorable thing, told chamber it was not acceptable to use the funds the way Metiva used them, but not going to punish chamber for something she did. Now it’s time to prosecute Metiva! "
A lesson for all organizations wrote on Oct 9, 2009 10:12 AM:
Dennis O. wrote on Oct 9, 2009 9:19 AM:
Ted wrote on Oct 9, 2009 8:45 AM:
It doesnt add upp wrote on Oct 9, 2009 7:59 AM:
Well 25% of $100K = $25k - yet the City is "claiming" that the $12.5 was not allowed? Last time I did simple math that is only 12.5%.
Why did this Chamber Board roll over to the Big Bad City?? "
How come wrote on Oct 9, 2009 7:47 AM:
I want to hear the newly elected officials ideas on growth,businesses, jobs and a future for my children and I have to read this.
I don't care - where is the real news??
Maybe it is time for me to go back to reading that other paper again. "
Im done wrote on Oct 9, 2009 12:10 AM:
Put her , Mitchell & Disher on the next boat to Chine - good riddens !
Anyone else interested in a petition to the owners?
Yet - this probably won't even be printed so why do I ask? "
Cant sleep wrote on Oct 9, 2009 12:04 AM:
Watch Ron & Mark I see you guys being attacked next!!
Go home Sleight - you are too left for us educated readers!! "
Raise wrote on Oct 8, 2009 11:57 PM:
She did not give it to herself & it was in the contract with the city - so maybe we need to ask the city about their “improprieties.”
Maybe it is time we start questioning the accuracy of this paper & their reporting.
BTW isn't Keri Sleight running for the board yet she allows this so called reporting to go on- I will be voting for anyone but her for the Chamber Board! "
Newcomer to Wasilla wrote on Oct 8, 2009 9:12 PM:
chamber and the Metiva's...well, this is one of the most hateful, mean communities we have lived in. First chance I get, I'm taking my business & moving my family back to Anchorage. "
none of my business wrote on Oct 8, 2009 9:10 PM:
I will advise everyone to stay away from any City funding in the future. Sounds like they are out to get someone here. "
Former City Employee wrote on Oct 8, 2009 8:53 PM:
discourse wrote on Oct 8, 2009 8:52 PM:
Metiva wrote on Oct 8, 2009 6:36 PM: