Wasilla gets earful on annexation

BY TODD L. DISHER
Frontiersman
Published on Saturday, November 21, 2009 9:19 PM AKST

WASILLA — The city of Wasilla has meet strong opposition to its future annexation plans at a series of informational sessions hosted over the past two weeks.

The city council has directed the administration to gather information on a number of areas for potential annexation. The areas include sections north of the city to Seldon Road, east past the Seward Meridian Parkway, south to include much of the Fairview Loop area and west past Jacobsen Lake.

After determining the public’s opinion, and the costs and benefits of annexing each area, the administration is to report its findings and recommendations back to the council. The council will then vote on whether or not to go forward, and if so, what areas should be included.

Courtesy City of Wasilla The proposed areas of annexation as presented to the city council are in blue, orange and pink. City council voted to have the planning department include all the areas in a study, as well as additional land east of Seward Meridian Parkway.

Of the many routes to finalize the process, the city is leaning toward having the state Legislature render the ultimate decision. If a plan is approved by the city council, it will go onto the state’s Local Boundary Commission. The LBC can confirm, reject or modify the plans before sending them to the Legislature.

At the third public forum Thursday night at Knik Elementary School, Wasilla Deputy Administrator Marvin Yoder gave a recap of what the city has heard from the residents so far and what the city’s reaction has been.

“Why are we doing this?” Yoder said was a question that frequently comes up. “The city has been getting inquiries from people wanting to be annexed.”

Yoder said the city has annexed land in the past by petitions signed by 100 percent of the affected homeowners. The city is simply pursing another option for inclusion for the areas that are less than unanimous, say 80 percent in favor, Yoder said.

“Is the city going to force its sewer and water on us?” Yoder rhetorically asked. “Absolutely no. The city moves in only when there is a need, only when the citizens ask or there is a mandate from the state.”

Zoning is another topic often raised, Yoder said. In the rural-residential areas of the Mat-Su Borough, almost anything is allowed. Wasilla’s R1 zone is limited to single family residencies.

“Do you want a gravel pit as a neighbor? Do you want a junkyard as a neighbor?” Yoder asked. “Or do you want other residences as neighbors?”

The questions from the audience after Yoder’s summation had a hostile tone.

Many focused on why annexation can’t be put to a vote of the people in the affected areas. Yoder responded voter turnout was below 20 percent in the last election, even with a borough-wide sales tax on the ballot. What’s more, he said, the people who physically live in the area would be eligible to vote, not necessary the property owners or business owners.

One woman was worried she would have to get a permit from the city’s planning commission to do anything on her property. She would be required to give notice to her neighbors living within 1,200 feet, and they could then stop her if they wanted to.

Yoder reassured the audience that the planning commission is not swayed by popularity contests.

Yoder admitted residents of the city do pay sales tax on their utilities, but they pay less property tax because they are not in a road service area. Also, insurance rates have been known to go down inside city limits because the Wasilla Police Department makes active patrols and community policing as opposed to reactive responses from Alaska State Troopers.

This offended some audience members who were doubtful of the Wasilla police’s efficacy. Another objected to the idea of saving money by not paying road service taxes. Instead, he said, the city makes people pay special assessments for the work that affects their property.

In an impromptu vote, only three people in attendance of Thursday’s meeting said they supported annexation. The other hundred of so said they did not.

Asked if there was anything that could stop this process, Yoder said it will come to a vote of the council before any further action, for or against annexation, is made. He encouraged people to make their opinions herd.

“At this time, my recommendation will be that we need to find another way to find out more information,” Yoder said. “I don’t think it is ready for the council to move forward.”

Contact Todd L. Disher at todd.disher@frontiersman.com or 352-2252.

Comments

17 comment(s)

    Read on wrote on Nov 29, 2009 4:43 PM:

    " And then do an FOIA request for the salaries of the hourly employees. Do a cost comparison and you'll quickly see the disparency between city management and the employees. It is not only sickening but unfathomable these people make $80K plus a year for what little they do. Their salaries would easily be 1/3 to 1/2 less in the private sector. Of course, that's why their in government because they don't have the skills, work ethic or ability to make it in the private sector. "

    Look again wrote on Nov 29, 2009 4:40 PM:

    " Keep in mind the $80,000+ a year salaries are going to the directors, deputy directors, deputy chief of police and police chief. They don't vote for their own increases but do lobby the mayor and council heavily to ensure they get their piece of your tax pie. I was told government was a service and not get rich quick scheme. If the Frontiersman had any real reporters, they do a FOIA request for the annual compensation in wages and benefits to the city management including Yoder, Tankersley, Giddings, Harvey, Smithers, Robinson and others. The taxpayers will be shocked! "

    split the borough wrote on Nov 29, 2009 7:25 AM:

    " Tara wrote on Nov 24, 2009 6:59 AM:
    " $80k a year? Whoa I might have to run for office! "

    who got to vote for the raises ?
    oh yes, only the ones getting it. "

    Mike wrote on Nov 27, 2009 12:13 PM:

    " So the supporters are "afraid" of the hostile audience? If they don't show up at the "Public Meetings" about it they can't be very supportive. Or are they sneaking in the back door of City Hall and whispering in people's ears?
    Maybe the city's inclination to listen to the "citizen visionaries" rather than actually talk to residents is the problem.
    Mike "

    Another City Guy wrote on Nov 24, 2009 7:21 AM:

    " Alaskan - what is so hard for you and all this other riff raff to understand? Your taxes will not go up if you get annexed. Your taxes will go down. The mill rate in the city is less than what you are paying now. You already pay the sales tax every time you come to Wasilla to go shopping. Wasilla city is geographically locked in with no room for expansion. The biggest reason for annexation that I see is that it improves our clout at the state level with a larger population base. "

    Tara wrote on Nov 24, 2009 6:59 AM:

    " $80k a year? Whoa I might have to run for office! "

    Alaskan wrote on Nov 23, 2009 9:15 AM:

    " Pure Tax Greed. Pay more and get less. My taxes are high enough without adding the City of Wasilla's tax rate to it. "

    Do-It-Yourself-er wrote on Nov 22, 2009 10:12 PM:

    " City Guy, Go take your meds and rest. Ghetto Lakes? Purple people? If the city of Wasilla doesn't want these communities, then why have they been included in this annexation garbage?

    Where are these 15,000 people you write about when they have an opportunity to stand up and be counted at public meetings?

    The city of Wasilla already gets outsider's money via salestax. That's fine... but leave the folks outside the city limits ALONE! They live where they live for a reason. "

    Uncle Jed wrote on Nov 22, 2009 8:12 PM:

    " We don't need fancy city folk. We dont want to be the Los Anchorage look alke! We are good country folk. Let's keep it that way. "

    City Guy wrote on Nov 22, 2009 7:28 PM:

    " We don't want your blue tarped roofs and meth labs from Getto Lakes. We don't want the purple people along seldon that don't have anyway to generate revenue even the Fishhook Council said they don't want you. There are subdivisions that want in we welcome them and pockets all over. There are 15,000 people envolved in this process 100 NIMBYS hardly speaks for them all. Let each area vote then we the city voters will pick if "we want you guys" in our city. We like spending your sales tax money why should I share my services with you. "

    Send Them A Message wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:54 PM:

    " Attend the city council meetings and use the three minutes of public testamony time you are entitled to. Go by the hundreds.Tell them why annexation is bad and how you will fight them every every step of process. Promise to help end the political careers of those politicians that marginalize you. Don't believe them when they say rules for your area will be less restrictive than for those of the city core. Once you are in those promises(Lies) will be forgotten. Talk to your friends in Palmer who have fought this battle before. YOU CAN WIN ORGANIZE NOW!!!!!! "

    Upgrade gene pool wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:33 PM:

    " There may be only one good thing about annexation in that it would increase the average IQ of Wasilla which should help to get the current morons out of office and place qualified currently non-Wasilla residents into office who will run city government properly. Palin, Keller, Rupright, current inbred council members and all those who help run the city, yep, Wasilla you need an upgrade and soon! "

    lee wrote on Nov 22, 2009 9:43 AM:

    " 1st of all there was no uncertainty of Wasilla Police-they are a joke, speeding around with there Professional citizens arrest licenses in there brand new vehicles every year to look good does not make good. I love the part of continuously harassing kids who congregate.Secondly city services are a joke, there aging and decrepping utilities are going to cost them a fortune and they know it hence why the push for more people on the tax basis, more permits is a given// whats next type, style and color of the houses, height of fences? "

    spell check wrote on Nov 22, 2009 8:26 AM:

    " heard not herd. "

    flbynite wrote on Nov 22, 2009 7:45 AM:

    " why no vote of the people, stay out of my back yard.. "

    Majoriy Voice wrote on Nov 22, 2009 5:22 AM:

    " The concept is fundamentally sound regarding annexation. Although it seems that the majority of those living in the areas to be included appear to not be in favor and that should be respected (regardless of the percentage that shows up to vote). It is my opinion, as one who lives in an area included, that it is not the right time. Again that is my opinion and if the majority voices an opinion that differs from mine then I will accept the majority’s decision. "

    Hypocrits wrote on Nov 21, 2009 10:58 PM:

    " Yoder, Giddings, Smithers, and almost all of the other directors and leaders at the city with the exception of Rupright live well outside of the city. NONE of them are city residents yet they insist upon epanding the boundaries to ensure the tax coffers stay filled to pay for their ridiculous $80,000 and higher salaries. None of them will be affected by the annexation but the rest of us would. Look at their salaries, the population of wasilla and compare to Anchorage. They're all overpaid with the exception of the regular employees who do all the work. Why? "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   




Classifieds




Make Us Your Homepage