Local News : Hatcher Pass skiing likely next year - Frontiersman

Hatcher Pass skiing likely next year

BY TODD L. DISHER
Frontiersman
Published on Saturday, February 13, 2010 6:31 PM AKST

PALMER — Cross-country skiers can expect to make their first strides away from a new Hatcher Pass Nordic skiing facility in the fall of 2011.

That was the projection presented by Steven Noble — the project engineer for DOWL HKM — to the Mat-Su Convention and Visitors Bureau on Friday.

The environmental impact statement should be completed by November, Noble said, with design work wrapping up in April 2011. Construction will take place next summer, and a parking lot, transit hub and access road should be done by the first snowfall next year.

(Use arrows above to view more photos)

Having the EIS done in only about two years is “light-speed” compared to the five to 10 years it normally takes for federally funded projects, Noble said. Also, the $2.9 million for the EIS is cheap compared to the $5 million to $10 million it normally costs, he said.

A draft of the environmental impact statement is nearly finished and should be put up for public review in April, Noble said. This comes after about 18 months of public input. Through the process, the engineers identified the best location for the access road and what the public wants the finished product to look like.

Noble said the road will branch off of Edgerton Parks Road and run just over one mile to the parking lot accessing the existing cross-country skiing trails. It will be a two-lane road with a separate 10-foot wide gravel path running its length. The parking lot will include a bus stop and restroom facilities.

Construction will be paid for with the balance of the $5.9 million allocated to the project largely from the Federal Transit Authority. To satisfy the funding requirements, public transit will have to make regular stops at the facility. Noble said engineers are currently working with MASCOT to iron out the details of bus service.

Anything beyond the transit facility — such as added trails, lights or a day lodge — will have to come from additional funding at a later date, Noble said. Part of the larger picture includes an Alpine skiing facility farther north. But, Noble said, funding is currently being focused on the Nordic facility.

Asked what the intended summer uses are for the parking lot and adjoining trails, Noble responded there has been a lot of interest from hikers and mountain bikers. Work on the project includes balancing all the comments from a variety of user groups.

Comments

16 comment(s)

    firebreather wrote on Jul 31, 2010 7:45 PM:

    " to"real alaskan" Wow, you've got yourself a real hate problem there! The hatcher pass area has been a mecca for ALL forms of enjoyment since before I was born and I have been skiing there probably before you even moved to the valley. I would hope the project can move forward so we ALL can enjoy the great gift of hatchers pass! "

    valley wrote on Feb 19, 2010 9:50 AM:

    " How is it that the machiners find riding areas, find ways to get to the areas, cut parking lots and beat trails...and all it takes is a few cross country skiers to come in and cry for equal use and the machiners are kicked to the curb? The only reason most of these skiers can get their Subarus into the back country is because of the sledders opening the area up in teh first place...hundreds of sledders per weekend vs. half a dozen skiers, and the skiers get their way...this is why sledders hate the skiers! "

    A Resident wrote on Feb 16, 2010 12:23 PM:

    " To Real Alaskan: You are right it's open to skiers...just like Glen Hwy is open for pedestians to walk, run, hike in the motorized lanes. Safety and needs are the issue...
    And I apologize for the misspelling of Hatcher Pass...I was more concern about what I was saying than spelling. "

    A Real Alaskan wrote on Feb 15, 2010 8:44 PM:

    " To "A Resident" I looked up how much area is open to skiers and snowmobilers, The whole area is open to skiers, and some areas closed to snowmobilers. I could not find any equal amount of area "closed" to skiers. Take Archangel Valley, originally designed to be motorized only, because 2 other valleys were off limits to them. But "NO" skiers insist on using the snowmobilers valley too. We need to close equal amounts of area for each user group for true equality. OPEN LITTLE-SU VALLEY TO MOTORIZED ONLY "

    offsoapstone wrote on Feb 15, 2010 8:10 PM:

    " I have been cross country skiing in the pass since 1975so this is news. "

    JD wrote on Feb 15, 2010 6:47 PM:

    " Come on. This is crap! There's cross country sking areas all over the place.Let's get the downhill ski area going! "

    disregard wrote on Feb 14, 2010 6:25 PM:

    " May we just disregard any comments that call Hatcher Pass "Hatchers Pass"?

    How worthy can an opinion be if the commenter doesn't even know the name of the area? "

    A Resident wrote on Feb 14, 2010 3:37 PM:

    " I am truely amazed how much misunderstanding there is about crosscountry ski trails! People, please do some research.... if you are wondering about hunting...look up ORV's and wildlife...Look up the % of land open to snowmachining vs. crosscountry skiing in the Hatchers Pass area...consider what is healthier...think of the future...already there's illegal snowmachining in non motorized areas buzzing like hornets...destroying permitted ski trails and chasing away wildlife. This isn't just about your own personal rights... "

    Real Alaskan wrote on Feb 14, 2010 2:39 PM:

    " Nothing worse than snowmobiling into a great area, stopping for a sandwich and some quality time, and then a group of noisy skiers come swishing by, dropping energy drink wrappers everywhere. I thought this side was suppose to stay multi-use, so we wouldn't have to put up with all the newbie, treehugging, granola spitters!!!!
    Time to get reorganized to run these low on the foodchains away AGAIN. Go find your own mountain. This one belongs to ALL the people. Build your own roads and facilities. We built these. "

    katherine morgan wrote on Feb 14, 2010 2:02 PM:

    " I was just wondering, how will this affect all the snowboarders that use hatcher Pass? Will you have to pay now? "

    Hmmmm wrote on Feb 14, 2010 11:28 AM:

    " Are they following the Hatchers Pass Management Plan set out by the state?

    Where off Edgerton Parks road? Will this impact a neighborhood? Why can't the acess road come off Palmer-Fishhook?

    Sounds like a great idea, but I'm concerned about traffic, and opening up this area to trails to those inconsiderate snowmobile riders that feel that any patch of snow is theirs for the taking. The whole side of the mountain is supposed to be unmotorized, yet we hear the whine of those nasty engines daily. "

    Wait wrote on Feb 14, 2010 10:36 AM:

    " Who agreed to this with public funds? I thought we were getting a DOWNHILL FACILITY??? CROSS COUNTRY IS SUBSIDIZED! "

    um hello wrote on Feb 14, 2010 8:01 AM:

    " those two areas look like the two valleys behind government peak.

    if that's the case, those are avalanche runout zones.

    just saying. "

    The truth to the issue wrote on Feb 14, 2010 12:37 AM:

    " The Mat-Su Borough used Federal Transportation Administration fundind to conduct impact studies to blanket areas for three propsed routes to this ski area. When knowing that there was only one route to the top. This study was used for the entire ski area. We waisted most of the FTA money conducting this study improper to FTA standards. Now the tax payer will need to pay the bill to finish this road with property taxes. The orginal plan had joint use allowing snowmachine access to Hatchers Pass was overlooked. Stand against the proposed area banning snowmachine access Mark Ewing "

    cant wait wrote on Feb 13, 2010 10:16 PM:

    " Have loved walking and skiing on Crevase Morain for years and look forward to using these new trails when they get built. Thanks to everyone who helped on this project over the years. "

    shame wrote on Feb 13, 2010 8:55 PM:

    " what a waste of money. if private enterprise thought it was feasible and would make money, this project would have happened long ago. instead, all taxpayers have to support it. too bad we can't refuse to let our money go to certain projects every year. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   








Classifieds




Make Us Your Homepage