Tuesday night I attended the Colony High School graduation ceremony in Wasilla. I was thrilled that Chuck Heath (father of Sarah Palin) would be the keynote speaker. Both my children had him as a substitute teacher and their days with him were insightful, educational and fun.
Chuck explained how he taught all his children to hunt, track and field dress game. Then, trying to be humorous, he said he was going to teach his daughter how to field dress a donkey this fall.
|
|
The “speech,” reminiscent of a Christian revival, ended with Chuck demanding the “G-word” be integrated back into public schools and government. A celebration for the senior class turned into a political diatribe and was both disappointing and inappropriate.
Bev Nash
Wasilla

Comments
135 comment(s)Outdoor Camp wrote on Aug 1, 2010 10:12 AM:
Armyof1 wrote on Jun 3, 2010 5:37 AM:
Jean wrote on May 29, 2010 8:19 AM:
hey suspicious wrote on May 29, 2010 8:17 AM:
Suspicious wrote on May 28, 2010 9:23 AM:
Au contraire to Littlebird wrote on May 27, 2010 7:20 PM:
Obviously, you cannot say the same thing. You assert a slant which certainly has nothing to do with independence.
When you use the term 'everyone', littlebird, of whom are you speaking exactly? After all, I certainly don't buy into your political stereotypes--but, then again--I'm Independent.
If even I am the only one who is not a member of your 'everyone' group (shudder the thought), then clearly, you only speak for yourself. "
D from Idaho wrote on May 27, 2010 6:53 PM:
Littlebird wrote on May 27, 2010 4:33 PM:
Republicans use scare tactics. Democrats use hyper-sensitivity and yes, they over-use the hand to the forehead "Oh, my fragile feelings have been hurt!" ploy over and over again. Apparently everybody knows it but you. I'm assuming because, like most, you're a slave to your political slant instead of being objective. Everybody who isn't a glazed-eyed sheep knows these things. Since I see you're simple and prone to a single-plane debate using insults and sophomoric taunts, as mentioned by others, we clearly see where you stand. Thank you. "
Au contraire to valleygirl wrote on May 27, 2010 11:27 AM:
Are you quoting text? From which and where?
What's this about Democratic Wellstone's funeral--and how does that relate to Chuck Heath slamming Dems at a high school graduation? "
Au contraire Endeavor wrote on May 27, 2010 11:24 AM:
90%, Endeavor? Really?
From where do you receive your statistics? (You just make them up, and state them as fact--doncha?)
I stand by my common sense stance--something you are clearly lacking. What you lack in terms of common sense you make up for in gross, outlandish exaggerations.
Talk about a teenager. "
valleygirl wrote on May 27, 2010 3:15 AM:
Politicizing Sen. Paul Wellstone's funeral - oh that's right, those were Democrats. Speaks volumes! "
valleygirl wrote on May 27, 2010 3:12 AM:
Social studies - Native-Americans were peaceful groups herding their horse (no joke!) till the Europeans came and ruined everything.
Health - Hug a tree, taste a leaf, become one with the tree.
Health - Students practice putting condoms on cucumbers.
Science - Shooting an animal that kills humans is revenge killing.
Yep, sounds middle of the road to me! "
Endeavor wrote on May 26, 2010 9:33 PM:
Au contraire to Endeavor wrote on May 26, 2010 4:48 PM:
Common sense.
Understand? (Probably not, but at least I gave it a shot.) "
Endeavor wrote on May 26, 2010 1:38 PM:
Not to say it doesn't happen at all, but you rarely see conservatives in the news wringing their hands, protesting and whining about their little feelings being hurt by something so slight. On the flip side, it's daily news regarding liberals. They embody and have perfected the art of "being offended". They wield and use it as leverage. Don't believe me? Read any newspaper, news magazine or watch TV. 90% of somebody crying that they were "offended" are liberals. That's just fact. And even when the conservatives try to use that tactic, they don't do it right. "
Au contraire watcher wrote on May 26, 2010 10:54 AM:
You know it, we know it and that's why you lack credibility.
It happens everyday. "
watcher wrote on May 26, 2010 10:29 AM:
Inspired wrote on May 26, 2010 9:43 AM:
BIgdaddy wrote on May 25, 2010 10:10 PM:
headphone wrote on May 25, 2010 7:34 PM:
Geesh wrote on May 24, 2010 9:01 AM:
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa wrote on May 23, 2010 6:07 PM:
Have we all had a good little cry? "
Speaking of the constitution wrote on May 23, 2010 12:53 PM:
Our founding fathers and the framers of our Constitution knew exactly what they were doing--they did NOT validate Christianity as "the" religion in the US, but endeavored to create a sustained environment for religious freedom and choice.
Hallelujiah! And to hades anyone whoever tries to tell us differently. "
non-believer wrote on May 23, 2010 9:39 AM:
baby girl wrote on May 23, 2010 7:54 AM:
TO 2009grad wrote on May 22, 2010 11:31 PM:
Keep looking...
Still looking...
Give up, you won't find it!
The establishment clause sates that the government cannot tell you how to worship. That's good in your case, since you like to keep your religion to weekends and holidays. Go back to school and learn your history. It's called reading. That gets taught in the elementary years! "
Wait. What wrote on May 22, 2010 10:03 PM:
Fred wrote on May 22, 2010 7:44 PM:
What does it matter if the majority applauded and laughed at his partisan comments: he should have saved it for a Republican or Tea Party Rally. "
To Palmer Farm wrote on May 22, 2010 12:04 PM:
Palmer Farm wrote on May 22, 2010 8:06 AM:
Take a minute and read. Don't assume. Read. "
So sad wrote on May 21, 2010 8:51 PM:
And--Jack-in the Box? Ha! So that's how 'another sad story' (check out the acronym there!) occupies their time.
But sticking to reality here...
Obviously, it was a red letter day for the Dems/Indies who're having a gut-busting laugh over Rand-one-step-forward-fifty-steps-back-Paul.
So much for 'another sad story' staying abreast of news stories that will impact future elections. They must feel sadder by the day. "
TO Palmer Farm wrote on May 21, 2010 7:44 PM:
Palmer Farm fails to address to which blogger he/she was responding. (Had they bothered to read the letter or the entries here it would appear there are none to which they could be logically be responding.)
Care to say, Palmer Farm--or are you hiding under the skirts of a Frontiersman friend? (If so, so much for high journalistic standards.) "
akborn wrote on May 21, 2010 4:28 PM:
another sad story wrote on May 21, 2010 11:40 AM:
rangermann262 wrote on May 21, 2010 6:07 AM:
So sad wrote on May 21, 2010 5:19 AM:
Hu-hum. "
To Power Wagon wrote on May 21, 2010 12:02 AM:
If I understand you, I think you're saying that the polls are predicting a conservative jump in the next election. Yes? Is this the basis of your idea that conservatism is on the rise?
Please try to respond in a logical, non-hateful manner. I like making you look silly, of course (I can't deny), but I'm also really wondering if you believe this stuff.
Note: I concede that repubs will take seats this midterm. "
be gone wrote on May 20, 2010 10:57 PM:
Power Wagon wrote on May 20, 2010 5:32 PM:
Dear Power Wagon wrote on May 20, 2010 12:59 PM:
Conservatism is being crushed under the weight of its own ignorant, illogical hate. "
Power Wagon wrote on May 20, 2010 9:01 AM:
to OMG wrote on May 20, 2010 8:56 AM:
Palmer Farm wrote on May 20, 2010 8:54 AM:
OMG wrote on May 20, 2010 7:21 AM:
----------------------------
Good lord--what a scream! One who doesn't eat animals or doesn't hate people based on their sexuality is automatically...liberal?
Dang if those liberals aren't easy to peg!
This blogger's entry's going up on my bulletin board under the heading "Stupid People Saying Stupid Things". (Scary knowing they're raising 6 kids.)
What outrageous liberal thing will Alaska teachers do next? Teach kids not to belch in class? Hang roles of toilet paper in the restroom? Assign homework? Condemn plagiarism?
Blasted liberals!
(Gasp!) What's the world coming to? "
Please Note wrote on May 20, 2010 6:09 AM:
The assertion has been made of liberal bias in the public schools. "To Please Note" essentially posits that the assertion IS the proof, and it is my job to disprove it, or I'm lazy.
That's not the way logical discourse works. If you make a claim, you should be able to back it up, at least with examples. The "if you can't see it, then...(fill in the derogatory blank)" argument is illogical, unconvincing, and, yes, intellectually lazy. "
Cortez wrote on May 19, 2010 9:21 PM:
TO Palmer Farm wrote on May 19, 2010 8:43 PM:
What in the world does that have to do with Obama 'slamming Republicans' in speeches?
If you can't you keep up with what's going on here keep your inane, irrelevant remarks and disorganized thinking to yourself. "
TO watcher wrote on May 19, 2010 6:00 PM:
Yet another wacky lie from another crazy, irresponsible right-winger with a big stupid mouth.
If the federal treasury had a nickel for every right-wing lie, this country would be out of debt in perpetuity. "
Palmer Farm wrote on May 19, 2010 4:49 PM:
Cortez wrote on May 19, 2010 4:14 PM:
Oh brother wrote on May 19, 2010 3:24 PM:
Just because you fear he will doesn't change the fact that he hasn't.
Pardon the rest of America if we don't want to jump on your nutty fear train.
Rational people base their expectations on a steady diet of reality and fact. Not fear. "
TO Palmer Farm wrote on May 19, 2010 2:33 PM:
It appears you're the one who has a problem with facts. "
average citizen wrote on May 19, 2010 1:16 PM:
to to please note wrote on May 19, 2010 11:38 AM:
to Please Note wrote on May 19, 2010 10:31 AM:
watcher wrote on May 19, 2010 7:04 AM:
Whattabunchahypocrites wrote on May 19, 2010 5:05 AM:
This defensiveness and support for Heath reflects the crazy thinking that goes hand-in-hand with all things Palin.
They play to and receive support from people of a lower intellect and socio-economic level, who lack rational processes or laudable critical thinking skills. And nobody mewls or whines faster or with more intensity than the Heath's/Palin's--and the rednecks who worship at their altar.
America's rightfully and permanently placed these people on the defensive.
Awwwwww... "
PJC wrote on May 19, 2010 4:27 AM:
Palmer Farm wrote on May 18, 2010 8:10 PM:
Karen wrote on May 18, 2010 7:46 PM:
Patricia wrote on May 18, 2010 7:06 PM:
Egrad wrote on May 18, 2010 5:25 PM:
Palins = FAIL "
John Strong wrote on May 18, 2010 5:13 PM:
Please Note wrote on May 18, 2010 4:44 PM:
Please explain wrote on May 18, 2010 4:42 PM:
huh? "
themom wrote on May 18, 2010 2:34 PM:
Cortez wrote on May 18, 2010 1:15 PM:
cortez wrote on May 18, 2010 12:57 PM:
to luvu wrote on May 18, 2010 12:56 PM:
To Chris wrote on May 18, 2010 12:36 PM:
When you spout off, please attempt to be at least a little historically accurate. "
luvu wrote on May 18, 2010 12:11 PM:
Chris wrote on May 18, 2010 10:49 AM:
It's obvious you don't. Most founding fathers were deists. "In God We Trust" was added to one coin a century after the founding of our nation, and not added to paper money until the 1950s.
You don't have to be "anti God" to want the separation of church and state. Looked at the middle east lately? "
snicker wrote on May 18, 2010 10:42 AM:
Ennealogic wrote on May 18, 2010 10:03 AM:
Thanks! "
Forrest Forrest Gump wrote on May 18, 2010 9:45 AM:
That's all I have to say about that. "
And yet wrote on May 18, 2010 8:15 AM:
Viv Jones wrote on May 18, 2010 5:46 AM:
Oh yeah wrote on May 17, 2010 9:11 PM:
Fascinating that Heath thumbs his nose at the US Constitution and Bill of Rights--with his God-in-schools demands--which would lead us to abandon both. His flagrant, disrespectful disregard for our founding fathers' outstanding handiwork evokes an astounding effrontery against the faltering Tea Party movement's motives.
Quite interesting, no?
Perhaps next year's speaker will be more of a patriot--than Chuck Heath. Let's hope. "
Off Base Remark wrote on May 17, 2010 7:35 PM:
It was the Kids night ! ! ! ! Congrats and welcome to the rat race.. "
Cortez wrote on May 17, 2010 3:13 PM:
Wow wrote on May 17, 2010 2:09 PM:
Out Side The Box wrote on May 17, 2010 12:23 PM:
Proud 2010 CHS Mom wrote on May 17, 2010 12:05 PM:
RedAlaskan wrote on May 17, 2010 11:51 AM:
The devisive words spoken by the Heaths and Palins is old and tacky.
I'm begining to think they like negative behavior. "
sharpie wrote on May 17, 2010 11:25 AM:
Always so funny how the same group that will intentionally drown out somebody speaking because they don't agree with thier political views, will encourage over-reaching government to limit your freedoms and believe in indoctrination over education will whip around and moan and cry about thier poor little feelings getting hurt over an obvious attempt at humor. Pathetic. "
JW wrote on May 17, 2010 10:32 AM:
2009Grad wrote on May 17, 2010 9:40 AM:
Alaskan wrote on May 17, 2010 9:40 AM:
to Mike wrote on May 17, 2010 7:56 AM:
Chuckie not a saint wrote on May 17, 2010 1:20 AM:
Mike in Wasilla wrote on May 16, 2010 10:44 PM:
grad wrote on May 16, 2010 10:36 PM:
say what wrote on May 16, 2010 1:13 PM:
Amen sharpie wrote on May 16, 2010 10:35 AM:
Well done Mr. Heath wrote on May 16, 2010 10:32 AM:
Oh Yes wrote on May 16, 2010 10:25 AM:
Patriot wrote on May 16, 2010 10:09 AM:
to an example wrote on May 16, 2010 10:09 AM:
Dear Leave Alaska wrote on May 16, 2010 9:02 AM:
to an example wrote on May 16, 2010 8:40 AM:
An example wrote on May 15, 2010 10:28 PM:
notanidiot wrote on May 15, 2010 10:27 PM:
Would it be OK for someone to say they wanted to be able to pray to Satan in the public school classroom?
There is a reason to keep God and Politics out of school We all have plenty of freedom to allow us to get that information and express opinions about in other institutions than public academic education. "
Dead Weight wrote on May 15, 2010 8:45 PM:
What do you call 1,000,000 Dems at the bottom of the Pacific?
Give up?
A good start!!
Go Chuck Go!!!! "
Mo wrote on May 15, 2010 8:41 PM:
to an example wrote on May 15, 2010 7:07 PM:
Colony Mom wrote on May 15, 2010 6:24 PM:
An example wrote on May 15, 2010 4:44 PM:
say what wrote on May 15, 2010 3:42 PM:
sharpie wrote on May 15, 2010 1:30 PM:
Colony family wrote on May 15, 2010 1:06 PM:
Lisnup wrote on May 15, 2010 10:36 AM:
Civility would be refreshing wrote on May 15, 2010 10:27 AM:
Please Give an Example wrote on May 14, 2010 10:47 PM:
Last Shreds Gone wrote on May 14, 2010 10:44 PM:
hitthespot wrote on May 14, 2010 10:43 PM:
Over Heath wrote on May 14, 2010 8:36 PM:
You're supporting tasteless jokes. A student would be suspended for "joking" about "field dressing" another student.
Liberal arts education does not make someone a liberal, it earns them a BA.
An FYI, schools here are NOT liberal. In fact, the closet liberal teachers lose their jobs. If you want the G-word in class - home school or go to one of the great private schools. "
independent wrote on May 14, 2010 6:08 PM:
akmom4 wrote on May 14, 2010 5:51 PM:
teacher wrote on May 14, 2010 5:50 PM:
Leave Alaska wrote on May 14, 2010 5:02 PM:
grow up wrote on May 14, 2010 4:50 PM:
The Herrins wrote on May 14, 2010 4:07 PM:
Kids these days have the liberal message crammed down their throats from kindergarten through college and one speech has all your knickers in a twist?
I was there, I filmed it and all I heard was the audience cheer so loudly it was deafening. I did not hear one naysayer or boo in the bunch.
I think you are just upset with him doing it at graduation because he got in the last word! "
George wrote on May 14, 2010 4:04 PM:
Lighten up... wrote on May 14, 2010 2:16 PM:
Larry Taylor - Big Lake wrote on May 14, 2010 1:26 PM:
watcher wrote on May 14, 2010 12:22 PM:
Puuullleeezzee wrote on May 14, 2010 11:51 AM:
I agree wrote on May 14, 2010 11:16 AM:
sharpie wrote on May 14, 2010 10:26 AM:
Meadow Lakes Madman wrote on May 14, 2010 8:30 AM:
Power Wagon wrote on May 14, 2010 8:16 AM:
Dear Bev wrote on May 14, 2010 7:26 AM:
CHS Parent wrote on May 14, 2010 6:41 AM:
Larry Wood wrote on May 14, 2010 6:15 AM:
As to the "G" word, it is liberally used by our forefathers, Mr. Nash, and ensconsed in the Supreme Court of the U.S., much to the chagrin of the liberal judges, I am certain.
Maybe, if there was a bit more morality, the girls would not overexposed, and the boys would understand that responsibility and marriage are the norm, not the exception.
That girls should be respected, and not used. Of course, that goes both ways.
Yeah, a bit more God is in order. "
DANNY wrote on May 14, 2010 6:15 AM:
I hope you are equally offended when liberals inject their opinions and prejudices into speeches. Just as President Obama did this last week at a college graduation ceremony.
Eviscerate:
1.to remove the entrails from; disembowel: to eviscerate a chicken.
2.to deprive of vital or essential parts: The censors eviscerated the book to make it inoffensive to the leaders of the party.
Just because most people use the first definition of a word, that does not make it the only definition. "