WASILLA — To a crowd of nodding heads that offered periodic interjections of “Amen,” Rep. Don Young said what was on his mind Monday regarding beluga whales.
“The designation of beluga whale critical habitat is the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen under the Endangered Species Act,” Young told the audience. “We need to start standing up to the federal government.”
Young was the first of five speakers invited to a town hall meeting the Conservative Patriots Group hosted for about 100 attendees regarding the pending designation of critical habitat for the Cook Inlet belugas. It’s a species the federal government has already listed as endangered. The law requires that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration designate what habitat is critical to maintaining endangered species.
In introducing the panel, CPG’s president, Jennie Bettine, said her group is working to oppose the habitat designation.
“CPG believes that this is bad science, just as climate change has been proven to be bad science,” she said.
The move has many in Alaska worried. One of Young’s colleagues on the dais, Arne Fuglvog of Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s office, summed up those fears: The permitting process for projects on the Inlet will be made more complex and more costly. Designating habitat opens the door to lawsuits with the potential to not just slow those projects down, but to kill them outright. And the burden of proof is on the developer or government body that’s being sued.
“You have to prove that you are not jeopardizing critical habitat,” Fuglvog said.
He pointed out that the other side in the debate, the side hoping to see the beluga get its critical habitat, has pointed to a number of commercial and recreational activities — everything from dumping effluent into the Inlet to small boats and jet skis — that it fears is harming the whales.
Which, he said, will almost certainly lead to “very targeted environmental litigation.”
Fuglvog said he could almost guarantee the project to mine coal in Chuitna would be the first project targeted.
Wasilla Mayor Verne Rupright, in his remarks, talked mostly about uncertainty. He said the Inlet is most definitely changing. It changed drastically after the 1964 earthquake, he pointed out. Some would like to believe that humans have caused the beluga’s population to decline, but nobody can prove that they did, the mayor said.
Echoing a comment Young made earlier in the night, he pointed out that there are fewer fish in the Inlet and that belugas eat fish. It stands to reason, Rupright said, that the whale population would then taper off to reach an equilibrium.
“So what’s next? Are we going to say the salmon have to be protected so the beluga can eat them?”
The final speaker in the program, former Anchorage Mayor Rick Mystrom, also spoke of that uncertainty. He said he looked at federal data and found that belugas declined between 1994 and 2000. Since then, he said, the population has stabilized, and maybe even seen a very slight rebound.
So what happened in those six years of decline? The Port of Anchorage increased the tonnage of cargo that crossed its docks, Mystrom said. The oil platforms in the Inlet experienced no increase in activity.
The only thing he could think of, Mystrom joked, was that he was mayor at the time. And so he promised to write a letter to the feds saying, “I promise I won’t run for mayor of Anchorage again.”
But he said the critical habitat designation is an overreaction.
“The huge amount of reaction for something that we’re not sure what caused it, that’s not realistic,” he said.
So what can activists like the CPG do? Every speaker told the audience to submit comments on the issue. NOAA is accepting comments until March 3. But when the audience got its chance to ask questions, the first asked how big of an impact those comments will have.
“If I were to say it had a lot of weight I would be misleading you,” Young said. He hoped that the regulators would listen to Alaskans, he said, but, “I’m not totally optimistic that’s going to happen.”
Contact Andrew Wellner at andrew.wellner@frontiersman.com or 352-2270.
Post a comment as
Report
Watch this discussion.
(26) comments
Kill all the belugas, then we wont have to worry anymore..
The comments about pollution harming the belugas sound very much like NOAA's "science".While it is possible that pollution is the reason that belugas population dropped there is no proof of that. In fact, the "best available science" shows that Cook Inlet belugas are remarkably free of pollution.It's all "maybe", "possibly" etc. There is NO science to back up a pollution problem with belugas. There is NO science to back up any reason for a population decline at all. In fact, the population has increased in recent years since hunting ceased.
Fisherman wrote on Feb 16, 2010 1:28 PM:" Stop the rapeing of Cook inlet fisheries, start the rabound of beluga whales. Save the fish save the whale save the sport fishing industry, I support the desiganation! "I could not agree more!!! Maybe with designation for the beluga whales, it will allow the salmon to actually get into the rivers so that the local SPORTFISHING industry can make a living instead of giving the commercial yaks first dibs on the salmon and then closing the rivers cause the counts aren't high enough!! GO BELUGAS!
Besides sewage(which includes heavy metals, hormones, blood thinners &other pharmaceuticals, cleaners& assorted chemicals,etc.),there are literally tons of poisons dumped directly onto soil; chemical fertilizers, pesticides, hebicides, fungicides that leach into the inlet. Cook inlet is where stormwater runs.Every drug,cleaner,and chemical gardening product seen on shelves at every store surrounding Cook Inlet ends up IN the Inlet eventually.These chemicals may very well be impacting the reproductive systems of species living in/near the inlet. I don't think there has been any tracking of newborn belugas.Have necropsies been performed on dead animals?Much research needs to be done.
It's sad to see Don Young blaming the belugas for Alaska's energy problems. If this is really about getting the Chuitna coal mine through, I think he'd be using his time better by advocating for the development of clean, renewable energy sources, not outdated and health-threatening sources like coal. Fortunately it's not up to Young but to Begich and Murkowski to make the next major decisions about energy use, since the Senators will soon be voting on a clean energy bill. Alaska's clean energy industry is already expanding fast and will blossom under national legislation, preventing unnecessary debates about whales.
The temperature-predicting rock (if the rock is wet it must be raining...) crowd now feels that they know more than actual scientists. What a sad group. I hope they go back under their rock and stay there for good. Our world doesn't need more mob mentality. Leave that for Iran and Pakistan.
If Don Young had ever appropriated enough money to Anchorage and Mat-Su to keep raw (primary treatment) sewage out of Cook Inlet, this issue wouldn't even be on the table. The Belugas would have a life and so would their food. Since I recently found out that all of Mat-Su's septic tanks get flushed into the Inlet - but not getting flushed out beyond Kachemak Bay - I'm starting to feel guilty about our family's "contribution" and the chlorine that gets dumped to supposedly sanitize the Inlet.
The photo of Don Young is very bizarre.It's like he's putting a blessing on the Conservative Patriots Group. Like he's a preacher or something. And the crowd yells out "Amen". Maybe, just maybe if these people pray hard enough they will get what they're wishing for.Which utlimately has something negative to do with Obama, Pelosi, and Reid.
We Alaskans need to be careful. Almost everything we consume; food, lumber, building materials (for EVERY project!) clothing, mail, even shampoo is shipped up via Cook Inlet!The beluga whale issue is a good example of why we'd better get more serious about setting aside more ag land for food production.
“CPG believes that this is bad science, just as climate change has been proven to be bad science,” I love how, a few dodgy actors and thier bad actions 'proves' climate change to be bad science. What sort of rocks do these lizard people live under? Portage and Matanuska and every other glacier on the planet isn't well documented to be melting before your very eyes. Human beings aren't really ruining the rest of the landscape with our landfills and stripmalls. It is all a 'Liberul Media' Hollywood trick!
I've read NOAAs studies and other studies on Belugas. I was at NOAAs meeting in Wasilla. It is obvious that there is not much known about the belugas in Cook Inlet. The "best available science" means not much science at all. Based on very little science they are going to take drastic action as long as it is in the direction of hurting the economy and not helping it. I'm starting to see a pattern here.
“You have to prove that you are not jeopardizing critical habitat,” Fuglvog said. “So what’s next? Are we going to say the salmon have to be protected so the beluga can eat them?”These folks already have a huge head start on wiping out the previously identified (1984) critical habitat of Jim Swan Wetlands via the AK DNR KRPUA whack job 'Plan'.There is no effective protection of anadromous fish habitat in sight at the headwaters. 'We don't need no stinkin' fish'. 'We are just gonna have to let that environment thing go.'
You are busted. Young announced his grand kids during his talk. He was first. Way before Ruright took the stage. If you were there you should know this. And if you are a member of the CPG you of all people should know never trust a politician. Oh I guess it is ok in your book because it makes the CPG look bigger and truth is not at the top of your list. I wouldn't exactly call it petty. I would call it setting the record straight. Again do not exaggerate.
Mayor Rupright at the podium said he counted 150 and that was before Rep. Young announced the arrival of his 14 children and their adult escort. Give it a break, why be so petty? Also,some people came and went during the meeting. The figure of 175-180 is accurate. The NOAA meeting had far less than half this number.
Stop the rapeing of Cook inlet fisheries, start the rabound of beluga whales. Save the fish save the whale save the sport fishing industry, I support the desiganation!
This issue needs further study before any designation is made. The NOAA studies are pretty flimsy and they even admitted it at their Wasilla meeting. Read their study and sampling data if you are in doubt, you may be shocked . There is no Congressional oversight of agencies such as NOAA and the EPA. They are responsible to Barack Obama, not you or I. Those who attended the CPG town hall such as Young, Mystrom and Rupright called for comprehensive, realistic studies to be done before we throw the Alaskan economy back into the 19th century. Is that wacko? NO.
Well so was I and there were not 175 people there. Try130 at most and that is counting the panel,the video guys and the reporters. Don't exaggerate.
It seems that some of the left leaning bloggers are turning on the hate again. Some people use hate because of their complete IGNORANCE of the issue. You environmental extremists use hate and intimidation against all who oppose you. This is no longer going to work. The average citizen calls BS on you. Try debating an issue intelligently without name calling and hate. Be the honorable citizens liberals used to be. Act like John Kennedy not Adolf Hitler if you can. I went to both the NOAA and CPG meetings. Did you?
"So what’s next? Are we going to say the salmon have to be protected so the beluga can eat them?”"Naw. Continue wiping them out so as to kill the beluga as quickly as possible, thus rendering ESA moot. The quickest way to wealth, [for the wealthy] as we all know, is by complete disregard for environmental indicators. Have faith, baby. Science is the residue of a conspiracy of liberals.
can you imagine if we left resource management and development decisions to these people? oh wait, that's what happened in the lower 48. that's why they have no fish and game and we do. just keep pillaging, because god will save you.
For decades drilling fluids were directly dumped over board and the waste water/affluent from the Municipal sewer plant are not up to the standards everybody else in the lower 48 are held to. So what Special Interest Group/Campaign Contributor is Young defending this time around? These kind of folks only believe the science when it benefits their cause.
Andrew, I appreciate your article, but let's not let one side of a controversial issue seem like the majority. 100 people is not the majority of Alaska. This not Wasilla, or Houston's or Anchorages inlet, as far as economic and environmental fallout goes, this is all of Alaska's problem. Also, if you are going to let someone say climate change is bad science, then you or them better back it up. Where are the other voices on this issue? I want to hear both sides.
WHAT ELSE WOULD ONE EXPECT FROM THE NO PARTY?
i support a lot of the tea party platform, but these folks sound crazy as loons. not surprised don young - the biggest big government guy ever when he had his hands on the transportation money - waded in here. he needs to get re-elected soon. but sorry to see lisa's staff joining this extreme crowd.
The attendance was actually much higher. 165 tickets for door prizes were given out and some people did not get them. An accurate estimate of attendance would be 175-180. I went to this and also the NOAA presentation in Wasilla last week. This town hall put on by Conservative Patriots Group was much more informative than the NOAA presentation.
If you click your heels, turn in a circle three times, and repeat "It's bad science", then it must be bad science...Try it:There's no such thing as global warming...There's no such thing as evolution...There's no such thing as science...There's no such thing as pollution...There's no such thing as gravity...There's no such thing as electricity...Feel better?
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.