2020 general election candidate questionnaires: House, Senate, Mat-Su Borough Assembly and School Board

The Frontiersman is pleased to present candidate questionnaires, submitted to each of the candidates running in the 2020 General Election in races for Mat-Su Borough Assembly, School Board, State House and Senate. Candidates in Assembly and School Board races were asked to complete the questionnaires in under 400 words and candidates for House and Senate were given 500 to complete the prompt. Candidates are listed in alphabetical order.

(Editor’s note: Due to the word limit imposed to give candidates the same opportunity to answer questions, some candidates chose to answer multiple questions in one answer or omit answers to specific questions entirely.)

Candidate biographies

House of Representatives

District 7

Jamin Burton - Non-affiliated

Jamin Burton works as the director of Band, Orchestra and The Northern Sound marching band at Colony High School. Burton is a first-time candidate who did not run in the Primary.

Christopher Kurka - Republican

Christopher Kurka was born in Anchorage, grew up in Eagle River, and currently lives in Wasilla with his wife and three children. Kurka is an entrepreneur who served as Executive Director of Alaska Right to Life from 2013-2018. Kurka won the Republican Primary in August with 69% of the votes.

District 8

Alma Hartley - Democrat

Alma Hartley lives in Big Lake and won the Democratic Primary in an unopposed race.

Kevin McCabe - Republican

Kevin McCabe is a pilot who lives in Big Lake. McCabe won the Republican Primary over Representative Mark Neuman with 64% of the votes.

District 9

Bill Johnson - Democrat

Bill Johnson was born in Fairbanks and lives near Delta. Johnson studied at the University of Alaska where he later taught. Johnson won the Democratic Primary in an unopposed race.

Rep. George Rauscher - Republican

Representative Rauscher is a business owner who moved to Alaska over 40 years ago and earned a degree from UAF. Rauscher won the Republican Primary with 61% of the votes.

District 10

Rep. David Eastman - Republican

Representative Eastman was born in California and studied at West Point. Eastman lives in Wasilla and won the Republican Primary with 53% of the votes.

Monica Stein-Olson - Democrat

Monica Stein-Olson lives in Talkeetna and served 30 years in Foreign Service. Stein-Olson won the Democratic Primary in an unopposed race.

District 11

Andrea Hackbarth - Democrat

Andrea Hackbarth lives in Palmer and earned a degree from UAA. Hackbarth won the Democratic Primary in an unopposed race.

Rep. DeLena Johnson - Republican

Representative Johnson was born in Oregon, grew up in Talkeetna and lives in Palmer. Johnson earned a degree from UAA and won the Republican Primary with 77% of the votes.

District 12

Rep. Cathy Tilton - Republican

Representative Tilton grew up in Anchorage and moved to the Mat-Su in 1980. Tilton won the Republican Primary in an unopposed race.

Senate

District D

Thomas Lamb - Nonpartisan

Lamb was born in Michigan and lives in Wasilla. Lamb won the Democratic Primary in an unopposed race.

Dan Mayfield - Nonaffiliated

Assemblyman Dan Mayfield has lived in Alaska for 58 years and has represented District 5 on the Assembly for the last six years.

Sen. David Wilson - Republican

Senator Wilson was born in California and moved to Alaska over 20 years ago. Wilson has served in the Senate since 2017 and won the Republican Primary with 34% of the votes.

District F

Jim Cooper - Democrat

Cooper replaced Stephanie Jeffers as the Democratic Nominee and formerly served as the Palmer Mayor and President of the Alaska Municipal League.

Rep. Shelley Hughes - Republican

Representative Hughes was born in Ohio and has lived in Alaska since 1976. Hughes has served in the Senate since 2016 and won the Republican Primary in an unopposed race.

Mat-Su Borough Assembly

District 4

Amber Sanchez is running for Assembly in District 4. The District is currently represented by Ted Leonard.

Colleen Vague is running for Assembly in District 4, currently represented by Ted Leonard. Vague is the Chair of the Mat-Su Borough Planning Commission.

Robert Yundt is a carpenter who is running for Assembly in District 4, currently represented by Ted Leonard.

District 5

Mike Alexander ran for State House in 2016 and is running for Assembly in District 5, currently represented by Dan Mayfield.

Lisa Behrens has lived in the Mat-Su for over 22 years and is running for Assembly in District 5, currently represented by Dan Mayfield.

Ken Koch is running for Assembly in District 5, currently represented by Dan Mayfield.

Clayton (Mokie) Tew is running for the Mat-Su Borough Assembly in District 5, a seat currently held by Dan Mayfield. Tew is a longtime local business owner and a resident of the Mat-Su Borough since 2002.

Mat-Su Borough School board

District 3

Richard “Ole” Larson was elected in 2008 and is the current District 3 School Board Member.

Jeanne Troshynski was an educator for over three decades and is running for the School Board seat in District 3, currently represented by Larson.

District 6

Leland Baugus is running for the School Board seat in District 6, currently represented by Kelsey Trimmer.

Dwight Probasco was a school district employee for over three decades and is running for the School Board seat in District 6, currently represented by Kelsey Trimmer.

Questionares:

House of representatives

District 7

Jamin Burton

Q: What long term or short term changes to the budget would you support and would that include the introduction of new taxes to add new revenues to the state’s budget?

Alaska is currently facing a 2.3 billion dollar shortfall and it is past time to address the problem. We cannot afford government services unless we are willing to pay for them. As I visited every home in the district this year, I had lots of good conversations with people. I am confident that people are willing to pay for services, but they want to have confidence that the government is being responsible and following through on their commitments. People support paying for law enforcement, infrastructure, and schools. They want them to run efficiently and be high quality. I support using a statewide sales tax to add revenue so that we can maintain services and provide economic stability without austerity. Cuts alone will not work. For example, we could cut every cent spent on education and would still have a deficit. Statewide sales tax is the most feasible way to generate new revenue and reduce our dependence on oil. I would seek a version of sales tax that is only collectible when the price of oil is below the point where it could sustain state services.

Q: If elected, would you propose specific cuts to the budget or do you favor searching for new revenue streams to balance the state’s budget? What role do future PFD payouts play in the economic future of our community?

The PFD is an important piece of Alaska’s economy. It infuses cash into the state’s economy, helping businesses as well as helping each resident in the state. I believe that the PFD belongs to the people; the legislature and the governor should be bound by existing statutes in its administration. If there are going to be changes to how the PFD is managed, the people should have a say in those changes. It is vital that we realize that our fiscal issues are real and immediate. All fiscal decisions will impact the future stability of the economy and the PFD, and we cannot continue as we have.

Q: What development of Alaska’s natural resources do you support?

I support resource development for all resources, provided it is done responsibly and safely. Alaska depends on harvesting and exporting resources. Developing natural resources cannot come at the expense of clean and safe water and air, but provided that the resources can be brought to market responsibly, I am in favor. One major project that is currently in the forefront of resource development is the Pebble Mine, which I currently oppose. Pebble’s partnership has not demonstrated good faith, nor have they demonstrated the ability to develop their project while protecting the environment.

Q: What local Valley issue are you most excited about working on and how would you address this problem?

Outside of the budgetary issues, the most pressing issue and the one I am most hopeful about making an impact on, is sexual assault and domestic violence. This plague of violence, exploitation, trafficking, and assault is too common in our community and our state. We have the tools to make a difference. We need to unite our efforts as a community to eradicate this evil. I would work to build a coalition of law enforcement, community leaders, federal agencies, prosecutors, and experts in this area. The goal would be to have a plan in place to update laws, prevention, and prosecution, both to support victims and put the perpetrators of these crimes in jail.

Christopher Kurka

Q: If elected, would you propose specific cuts to the budget or do you favor searching for new revenue streams to balance the state’s budget?

The politicians in Juneau have gotten drunk on excess money during the high oil prices. They have doubled the budget, now we have an oversized and unsustainable state government. Breaking the addiction will be painful but necessary. Alaskans simply cannot afford the massive size state government has grown to. Big government like we have is the opposite of our American Ideals of liberty, free enterprise and a private economy. This is why I have pledged to oppose any increase in taxes, this would just further cripple our economy.

Q: What role do future PFD payouts play in the economic future of our community?

The PFD belongs to Alaskans, not to state government. I will fight to keep the PFD out of the hands of greedy politicians and those wanting to continue to prop up an oversized unsustainable state government.

Q: What development of Alaska’s natural resources do you support?

Good stewardship means both development and caring for the environment. I support all natural resource development that is done in a way that does not destroy the environment.

Q: What local Valley issue are you most excited about working on and how would you address this problem?

Less than 1% of Alaska’s land is owned by Alaskans. This puts an artificial squeeze on the availability of private land and jacks up the cost of living substantially higher than the national average. Property is a fundamental tenant of liberty and the American dream. I will work to open up land so that Alaskans can more readily realize that dream. Selling state land will also help close the budget deficit.

House District 8

Kevin McCabe

Q: What long term or short term changes to the budget would you support and would that include the introduction of new taxes to add new revenues to the state’s budget?

Everything is on the table. I would oppose new taxes unless and until it is the last resort. Considering the looming Covid-shut-down fiscal and job crisis, we certainly do not need to add a new burden to Alaskans via any kind of tax. Not only would it contribute to the brain-drain of talented, industrious Alaskans departing for greener pastures, but it would contribute reducing revenues. A shrinking taxable base of workers also means shrinkage of the revenue we are trying to produce via any tax. So any kind of tax, no matter how it is identified to the voters needs to be the very last thing we consider.

Q: If elected, would you propose specific cuts to the budget or do you favor searching for new revenue streams to balance the state’s budget?

Our budget, despite what some will tell you, has not shrunk at all. In fact, the operating budget increased a minimum of 3%/year for the last several years. We need to stop focusing on process and start focusing on results. Revenue generation is, not on the backs of Alaskans but by finding ways to monetize our resources. We need to create jobs, not a welfare state, dependent on the federal government. Cutting only the capital budget reduces the number of great jobs in the state, a hidden cost.

Q: What role do future PFD payouts play in the economic future of our community?

The PFD is pivotal for economic recovery. The money it will put into the economy will have a huge impact on job creation and business profits. The PFD belongs to the people, should be paid to Alaskans first, outside the budget. It is better spent by them and, due to the multiplier effect of “non-government” money it can help us to rebuild our economy.

Q: What development of Alaska’s natural resources do you support?

All of them. I believe that Alaskans are best equipped to determine the safety and efficacy of developing our various resources. This is our state; we live here. We will not allow any resource development to harm our state. There are many examples of federal (EPA, NFMS, NPS) bureaucratic agencies attempting to regulate our state, that have created worse situations for Alaska and Alaskans. Alaskans need to take control of our resources and the development of them and find ways to safely fulfill the demands of our constitution which says (in article VIII, section 1) “It is the policy of the State to encourage the settlement of its land and the development of its resources by making them available for maximum use consistent with the public interest.” Alaskans are well equipped for this task. We love our state, our waters, and our skies.

Q: What local Valley issue are you most excited about working on and how would you address this problem?

KGB road, not only for the safety, but for the access to Port Mackenzie which also needs to be developed to its full potential. I also support the Alberta to Alaska Railway and the Houston to Port Mack rail spur. We have also got to find ways to reduce the cost of our electricity. The MatSu is uniquely equipped to do this and I believe we have the work force with the talent and ability to not only finish, but operate, the Susitna-Watana Hydro project.

District 9

Bill Johnson

Q: What long term or short term changes to the budget would you support and would that include the introduction of new taxes to add new revenues to the state’s budget?

The most immediate economic change would be to facilitate moving CARES Act money to where it belongs. Local governments and businesses are hurting and we could be helping them with directed grants. This is federal money that was made available for us to use to ease the economic impact of the pandemic. Most of it is still unspent.

Q: If elected, would you propose specific cuts to the budget or do you favor searching for new revenue streams to balance the state’s budget?

The question here becomes, What is the right sized government for Alaska? I would set a goal of funding the government at the 1982 level, adjusted for inflation and population growth. Under that formula today's budget would be about 25% higher. This is a level established in the Alaska Constitution, Article IX Section 16. I believe in following the constitution. If we adhere to the Constitution we have only one remedy: find new revenue. The first thing we must do is to get our Fair Share of our oil revenue. But, even that will not be enough. For fiscal year 20/21 we are about $3 billion short. Right now we are only expecting $600 to $700 million from Fair Share. We will still be more than $2 billion short. If we turn to the Earnings Reserve Account we are seriously jeopardizing our future income from the Permanent Fund. With that in mid, an income tax may be the only option. Grim, but that is the truth.

Q: What role do future PFD payouts play in the economic future of our community?

I have received every Dividend that has been paid. Sometimes I spent it wisely, and sometimes I did not. But, every Dividend came with the knowledge that it was a bonus because the state was making so much money. I also knew that when we Alaskans created the Permanent Fund in the Alaska Constitution, Article IX Section 15, it was not to pay a Dividend. It was created as an investment account, the interest to be used to fund the government as necessary. A rainy day account if you will. It is raining, hard.

Q: What development of Alaska’s natural resources do you support?

It is the Legislature's responsibility, in the Constitution, Article VIII Section 2, to get maximum benefit from our resources. Getting the maximum benefit for selling our oil should certainly include getting a Fair Share of the profits. We should approach selling our other resources in the same manner. I do not support developing any resource unless it is done in an environmentally sustainable way. No on Pebble. I must add that Article VIII;, Section 2 also mandates that we not just develop, but also conserve our natural resources. We only have one world.

Q: What local Valley issue are you most excited about working on and how would you address this problem?

In District 9 local issues vary widely. It depends on whether you are in the Valley or in Glennallen or Valdez or Whittier or Delta or the places in between. One thing that the whole District has in common though, is the poor transportation infrastructure. The Glenn and Richardson highways are full of potholes and frost heaves and are in stark contrast to the Parks. The ferry system is under-funded and under-maintained. This is unacceptable.

George Rauscher

Q: What long term or short term changes to the budget would you support and would that include the introduction of new taxes to add new revenues to the state’s budget?

In the long term, our budget must focus on the constitutionally mandated functions of government: education, public safety, and healthcare. Education and Healthcare make up most of our budget, so to focus on them means to find efficiencies, and cut some of the fat. In the short term, we need to task each department with focusing on their core mission, which is to serve Alaskans in a more efficient manner.

Q: If elected, would you propose specific cuts to the budget or do you favor searching for new revenue streams to balance the state’s budget?

One of the things that happens first is we receive the governor’s budget in December and work off of that. We try to give the governor our input ahead of time so the process of deciding the size of the budget won’t take as long. There are cuts to the budget that can still be made through finding efficiencies in department operations, being smarter with our education dollars, and getting control of the increasing Medicaid costs. To me good revenue streams are resource development projects.

Q: What role do future PFD payouts play in the economic future of our community?

I guess you must first define our community. My district is from Whittier to Delta, the Denali Highway, Glennallen, Valdez and all points in between. A major percentage of that area is rural. The role of future payouts to the majority of my district means heating oil for the winter, food n the table during layoffs from seasonal jobs, paying for winter snow removal, getting through the long winter months, or sometimes just paying medical bills. The PFD has a huge impact on our economy.

Q: What development of Alaska’s natural resources do you support?

The Ambler Road, the graphite mine up north, oil and gas projects in the Cook Inlet and on the North Slope, protecting our state and federal fishing waters, timber harvesting, and farming is providing for our state’s food security. We can, and do, all of these safely.

Q: What local Valley issue are you most excited about working on and how would you address this problem?

Finishing the rail-spur, which must happen, has been very exciting for me in the past few years. To make that happen I will continue to lead the fight for the Canadian Rail Project (A to A) from Fort McMurray Alberta Canada to the Mat Su Valley Port. I will continue to engage our federal in international partners for scoping, feasibility, and financing opportunities.

District 10

David Eastman

Q: What long term or short term changes to the budget would you support and would that include the introduction of new taxes to add new revenues to the state’s budget?

With the notable exception of Norway, nations that have experienced oil booms and the resultant increases in government spending, have allowed government to grow to unsustainable levels. Once the oil boom fades, as it always does, government spending remains at inflated levels long after the economy that it was based on has departed. Alaska is no exception. We must right-size our state government to the economy we have, not the economy we used to have. This requires reworking our state budget to reflect actual revenues. In short, we are now forced to adopt a balanced budget. Other states that have failed to take this basic step are now spinning out of control. We would do well to learn from their example. One thing is clear, we cannot allow that to happen here in Alaska.

Q: What role do future PFD payouts play in the economic future of our community?

The Permanent Fund Dividend reflects a small portion (less than 5%) of the value of the natural resources that belong to all Alaskans. The state directs the rest (more than 95%) to government and recipients of government funding, at least notionally on behalf of the people. It is important that a portion of these resources continue to be returned to the people so that they can decide for themselves how it will be spent on their behalf. Reducing Alaskans’ portion of their mineral wealth below 2%, as the legislature has done in recent years, is not only bad policy, but it has been accomplished by deliberately setting aside state law which determines the calculation of the dividend and in doing so has done damaged public trust. Redirecting the Permanent Fund Dividend to bolster unsustainable state spending also profoundly upsets the balance between the public sector and the private sector, which erodes the strength of our economy over time.

Q: What local Valley issue are you most excited about working on and how would you address this problem?

I support the responsible development of all of Alaska’s natural resources. Companies involved in the development and production of our resources should all be held to the same established standards, which should be adjusted sparingly based on the development of new technologies not the changing winds of politics. Our high standards and tax levels should be consistent over time, and apply equally to large companies and small ones who cannot afford expensive lobbyists.

The federal government continues to retain control of the vast majority of the land in our state. Under current law, the federal government is required to make annual payments to the state to offset the revenue lost to the state as a consequence of its continuing to maintain control of that land. However, it only pays a small fraction of the state revenue that could be generated by the land it currently possesses. As long as the federal government maintains control of land within the State of Alaska, it should be made to fully compensate the state for its lost revenue through the federal Payment In Lieu of Taxes (PILT) Program. Anything less is not fair to the people of Alaska. I would say more, but have reached the maximum word limit for this interview.

District 11

DeLena Johnson

Q: What long term or short term changes to the budget would you support and would that include the introduction of new taxes to add new revenues to the state’s budget?

We must have a realistic spending cap before any taxes are levied. A realistic spending cap is the only way to rein in spending. Without a spending cap, the Permanent Fund corpus will continue to be targeted, along with adding taxes to pay for Alaska’s unsustainable spending habits.

Q: If elected, would you propose specific cuts to the budget or do you favor searching for new revenue streams to balance the state’s budget?

Everything should be on the table and carefully prioritized. First, we must address healthcare spending and healthcare costs in Alaska. One area that should be looked at closely is the optional Medicaid spending. Without healthcare costs under control, we will eventually drain the Permanent Fund to pay for it. There's much more that can be done in partnership with local and municipal governments for cost-containment. There are simply not enough industries or wages to tax that will cover Alaska's current level of spending.

Q: What role do future PFD payouts play in the economic future of our community?

The PFD payout was never intended to diminish as the size of the Operating budget increased, it is a separate fund. Unless and until the formula is changed in statute, the PFD should be paid. This year, in the midst of the COVID-19 crisis, is the time to be honest with the Dividend and make the full dividend payment.

Q: What development of Alaska’s natural resources do you support?

I support all responsible resource development. It is particularly important to support continued production in our legacy oil fields and to make sure that the new oil finds are developed. Also, it is critical that the State does not hinder development in ANWR and the NPRA.

Q: What local Valley issue are you most excited about working on and how would you address this problem?

I am excited at the prospect of businesses, churches and schools being open in a safe and positive manner. The State must provide the tools to allow for schools, businesses, and workplaces to establish reasonable, everyday procedures that provide a critical balance in this pandemic. I look forward to seeing how things change that we have taken for granted. We have all learned more about ourselves these last few months and have seen areas that need to improve - such as delivery of education using the latest technology and keeping our trade corridors open for business. A lot of local industries have been creative to meet new demands. I want to do my part and continue to encourage that creativity and independent Alaska spirit.

District 12

Cathy Tilton

Q: What long term or short term changes to the budget would you support and would that include the introduction of new taxes to add new revenues to the state’s budget?

Before we have the discussion about new revenue, in any form, we need to place a new constitutional spending limit before the voters. We must regain the confidence of Alaskans by allowing them an active role in future state spending before asking them to reach in their pockets. As the ranking member of the House Finance Committee, I have worked closely with Gov. Dunleavy to place downward pressure on state spending.

Q: If elected, would you propose specific cuts to the budget or do you favor searching for new revenue streams to balance the state’s budget?

Over the last three terms, I have ALWAYS proposed specific cuts and I will continue to do so. Coming up with new taxes is easy. Finding new reductions and innovative ways to do business is hard. I firmly understand the decisions Alaska is now facing, but we will never have the trust of our fellow residents until we get serious about overspending.

Q: What role do future PFD payouts play in the economic future of our community?

The PFD is an important component to Alaska’s economy and Alaskans. I have supported a full statutory payout, since running the first time. The issue of the role the PFD plays in the future needs to be a conversation with every Alaskan, not a unilateral decision by the Legislature.

Q: What development of Alaska’s natural resources do you support?

I support any natural resource project that employs Alaskans and responsibly develops our resources consistent with our state constitution. What is essential is creating an environment that encourages ongoing and new investment in Alaska.

Q: What local Valley issue are you most excited about working on and how would you address this problem?

Ensuring continued progress on critical transportation projects is, perhaps, the most important issue facing the MatSu. We must finish the safety corridor on KGB and make progress on the previously approved upgrades for Fairview Loop. Also, we need to remove burdensome regulations on Alaska businesses to invigorate Alaska’s economy. Lastly, moving the legislative session to the road system will be good for the MatSu and the rest of the state.

SENATE

District D

Thomas Lamb

Q: What long term or short term changes to the budget would you support and would that include the introduction of new taxes to add new revenues to the state’s budget?

First taxes. Increase the sales tax on alcohol and marijuana to a level that covers the social and healthcare services costs from their abuse in consumption. Increase the state gas tax to cover the costs of road maintenance. Lastly, use part of the PFD by making a five year draw to cover the costs of building the Knik Arm bridge. Education - propose that the education system in Alaska become decentralized where 85% of the state education budget goes directly to each school for operation and 15% goes towards maintenance. The creation of an education endowment for the University of Alaska. This would be accomplished by using revenues from the new fields in the NPR-A.

Q: If elected, would you propose specific cuts to the budget or do you favor searching for new revenue streams to balance the state’s budget?

The listed taxes above with a change in a centralized education system to a decentralized system. Decreasing Medicaid fraud and costs through the use of developing blockchain technology. I have posted a detailed study on how blockchain technology can decrease Medicaid costs and fraud at lamb4senate.com under the issues link. You will find the study under the heading of Health and Social Services.

Q: What role do future PFD payouts play in the economic future of our community?

I'm not making the promise to voters in Senate District D of a full PFD while suggesting that infrastructure needs to be ramped up. To build a Knik Arm bridge, it will require a sacrifice of a full PFD over 5 years. Without it, the bridge will never be built. I would like to add that for the past 3 years I have voluntarily not applied for the PFD because I saw the fiscal crisis. It was a personal decision and I certainly don't have a large income. I live within my means.

Q: What development of Alaska’s natural resources do you support?

Oil, Gas and Coalbed methane (Syngas out in Sutton). Mining in the interior, value added production with fisheries in South West Alaska. Value added production of sheathing goods in South East Alaska.

Q: What local Valley issue are you most excited about working on and how would you address this problem?

Reinstating the debt reimbursement for school bonds under a decentralized school system. Property tax relief. Building the Knik Arm bridge - there would be no need for a Wasilla bypass. Most of the KGB traffic would flow across the Knik Arm bridge.

Dan Mayfield

Q: If elected, would you propose specific cuts to the budget or do you favor searching for new revenue streams to balance the state’s budget?

Alaska cannot cut $1 Billion, much less $2.3 Billion, from the budget and still meet its constitutional mandates. Cuts are already ripping apart the fabric of our State. This question captures the choices that have faced Governors and Legislators for the last several years. Yet, no leadership has come forward with solutions, just political football. Alaska needs to take advantage of all our natural resources, and we need to have a robust discussion on how we can fund our constitutional mandates and promises while protecting the PFD for the future. This discussion will need to happen this legislative session.

Q: If elected, would you propose specific cuts to the budget or do you favor searching for new revenue streams to balance the state’s budget?

I’m running because Alaska needs a new fiscal plan that sustains us through the ups and downs of unpredictable oil revenues and keeps our communities vibrant. We cannot cut our way to prosperity, certainly not with an anticipated $2.3 Billion deficit. Alaska needs diversified revenue streams and responsible fiscal management so we can still fund education, public safety, and infrastructure maintenance in both good and bad times.

Q: What role do future PFD payouts play in the economic future of our community?

At the same time, we need to protect the full PFD and put it in the Constitution so that we can pass that legacy down to our kids.The benefits of our unique PFD system have been a boon for local business and uplifted basic household income throughout Alaska. In the past, our oil helped countless individuals and families offset the higher cost of living, helped with college educations and helped provide startup costs for small, local businesses. Currently, Alaskans are not getting the full value of our natural resources as demanded by the state constitution. I will protect the Alaska Permanent Fund and the dividend in the Alaska constitution to preserve the spending power and investment choices of Alaskans.

Q: What development of Alaska’s natural resources do you support?

I support development of all natural resources. Projects that seek to develop those resources must be done safety, be able to coexist with our culture, our way of life, our pre-existing economies and have a minimal impact on our landscape. Not all projects will measure up and Alaskans must have the fortitude to say No in some circumstances. When we do develop these resources, we must remember they belong to the people of Alaska and that developers must pay royalties to develop them. We should not be in a position of paying developers to take our God given resources.

Q: What local Valley issue are you most excited about working on and how would you address this problem?

Knik Goose Bay Road is one of the most unsafe roads in the State. Reconstruction of this road has been in planning for many years but simply has not gotten traction to the point of getting the work done. As a Senator, this project will be the number one project on my radar. Lives are being lost. The funding is there. I will have the fortitude and tenacity to follow up with ADOT to get boots on the ground working to complete KGB Road.

David Wilson

Q: What long term or short term changes to the budget would you support and would that include the introduction of new taxes to add new revenues to the state’s budget?

We need to have a realistic state spending cap before we add any new taxes. A spending cap will help to address our long-term budget issues.

Q: If elected, would you propose specific cuts to the budget or do you favor searching for new revenue streams to balance the state’s budget?

Our budget issues will not be solved by one specific cut or change; the solution must be holistic. I support creating a smaller, more efficient government. For me it is more than just budget cuts. We need to look at retooling government services. The legislature needs to do everything it can to responsibly reduce spending AND protect vulnerable populations. Those two goals are not mutually exclusive. If we make the hole smaller, it will be easier to fill without damage to Alaskans.

Q: What role do future PFD payouts play in the economic future of our community?

The PFD is a huge economic driver, injecting billions of dollars into our state’s economy each year. I support, and have always supported, paying a full PFD according to statute. The benefits of the PFD should not be limited to one generation of Alaskans.

Q: What development of Alaska’s natural resources do you support?

Alaska is a resource rich state. I support all responsible development that will not trade one resource for another and clears our rigorous permitting hurdles.

Q: What local Valley issue are you most excited about working on and how would you address this problem?

The Mat-Su Valley is the fastest growing region of the state. Improving and maintain infrastructure is a matter of life and death here. The reconstruction of Knik Goose Bay Road remains one of my highest legislative priorities. Safe roads mean safer communities and I am proud to lead the effort to keep this project alive. With the help of my colleagues in the Mat-Su I was able to secure funding for the road resurfacing that was done this summer. My future infrastructure priorities include the Pt. Mackenzie port, the rail extension, and the Susitna Watana damn. Any one of the projects would produce high paying jobs for the Mat-Su and help to lower the cost of living by lowering transportation and power costs. The would also bring new industry to our area.

District F

Jim Cooper

Q: If elected, would you propose specific cuts to the budget or do you favor searching for new revenue streams to balance the state’s budget?

These two questions are interrelated. The state’s budget has been reduced to its fullest extent possible. It has been cut 43% the past 8 years. Additional cuts should never be at the expense of the people and their families. Continued spending from the savings account is never a good thing and is not fiscally responsible. Not discussing additional sources of revenue is foolhardy. The budget next year, without paying a PFD, will be short $300 million and with a PFD it will be short $2 billion. Trying to fill the budget gap with funding cuts to important viable programs; education, social services and health services, all which impact families, is disastrous. The only way to balance the budget is to examine additional revenue or income streams. They include: increasing oil severance tax, motor fuel tax increase, income tax and lastly sales tax. We also need to diversify our economy and eliminate our dependence on oil. Solar power, wind power and fuel cell generation need to be examined as future sources of revenue.

Q: What role do future PFD payouts play in the economic future of our community?

The PFD is most important to those families with lower income. If we don’t invest in our future by providing a stream of income, the PFD will cease to exist. To help in this cause, additional revenue sources are required. The first viable solution is to get our fair share from the oil companies. The billion plus dollars a year going to oil companies need to come back to the state. We should be getting that money. The oil companies are getting about $24 a barrel profit on our oil, $13 a barrel nationwide and $11 a barrel worldwide. Alaskans are making the oil companies rich. We are giving away our money. To preserve the PFD, we need income to balance our budget so we don’t keep “dipping” into our savings account to fund the budget.

Q: What development of Alaska’s natural resources do you support?

As it is currently under production and the world is not giving consumption up, oil needs to continue to be developed, but we need to begin developing wind power, solar power and fuel cells. Oil will not last forever and alternative sources of energy need to be explored.

Q: What local Valley issue are you most excited about working on and how would you address this problem?

Several issues face the valley. One of the most important for families is continued access to good education. The repeal of the School bond debt reimbursement program has serious consequences for families. By eliminating this program, all residents of the Mat-Su valley will have their taxes raised. Because of this repeal, the Borough is scheduled to raise the mill rate by 2.4 mills. If there are to be new or renovated schools or continued maintenance to the schools, these entire costs will be borne by the residents of the Borough. If not funded, classrooms will be overcrowded and quality education will be diminished. There won’t be enough teachers and our children will not receive the education needed. This program MUST be reinstated and fully funded. I will work with all legislators to ensure this program is restored.

Shelley Hughes

Q: What role do future PFD payouts play in the economic future of our community?

Our state government’s cost is disproportional to our small population and economic output. We must fix both sides of this equation: 1) we must restructure government to serve us well, affordably and sustainably; 2) we must unleash the private sector by reducing obstacles and opening opportunities for economic diversification. On the fiscal side, we need to fix the constitutional spending cap. We need an independent sunset audit commission to provide unbiased recommendations for restructuring agencies and formulas. The legislature would take action on the audit, because failure to do so would cause agencies to expire. This would allow a glidepath of operating budget reductions. Currently $2 billion is hidden in various funds, even though our constitution prohibits dedicated funds. With prudent planning, these funds can assist in the glidepath without necessarily ending the associated programs. The legislature should consider diverting some of the $400 million in petroleum property taxes (collected by a handful of municipalities) to to offset state education costs. We need to consider inflation-proofing the Permanent Fund prior to the 50/50 split of the ERA draw between the people and the government. This would provide an estimated $500 million to help close the fiscal gap. As we grow the economy, depending on oil prices, new resource development, the rail connection, emerging energy solutions, etc., we will come close to closing the gap.

If we restructure operations for efficiency and take the steps above, and revenues are still insufficient, economists recommend a sales tax with exclusions as the least disruptive to the economy, the least apt to cause an outmigration of productive residents, the least amount out of Alaskans’ wallets and the most out of nonresidents’ wallets. This sales tax is a last step only to be taken after actions such as those outlined above.

Q: What development of Alaska’s natural resources do you support?

I support responsible development whether oil, gas, timber, mining, fisheries, agriculture, etc. to decrease AK’s (and US) dependence on outside sources as well as to increase outside dollars circulating in our economy. We should strive toward processing our resources rather than shipping out raw materials.

Q: What local Valley issue are you most excited about working on and how would you address this problem?

I am the state senate champion for the Alaska to Alberta rail (passed SJR11) which reached a milestone in September with the presidential permit signing. I’ll work to remove barriers to assist this non-government-funded project to move forward to tie into Port MacKenzie to increase opportunities and provide a robust economic base so our region transforms from a bedroom community into an independent and productive community. The economies of scale for commodities moving in and out of area will open up agriculture and opportunities for the processing of raw materials. Meaningful employment at higher pay will help address some of the social challenges residents face and decrease crime, drugs, and poverty. I will continue to work specifically on reducing recidivism (revolving prison door) through proven treatment and work training options inside and outside of the prison walls, particularly on the evidence-based. data-focused pilot project underway I helped secure at Set Free Alaska,

Mat-Su Borough Assembly

District 4

Amber Sanchez

Q: What do you believe is the most pressing issue for constituents in the borough and how would you work to address this problem if elected?

Road Conditions and Crime. I will address Crime in Question #2. KGB Road needs to be a four-lane road! We have failed residents who must use that road every day. Stop lights and headlight enforcement is not the solution, but are just a bandaid. That highway needs to be widened and work needs to begin in the Spring of 2021. This needs to be the highest priority! Other roads that need to be addressed ASAP are Seward-Meridian and Bogard as well as Bogard Extension to the Roundabout. These roads should be, at the very least, 2 lanes with a center left-turning lane throughout.

Q: What do you see as the clearest path forward to combat crime and address the issue of police powers in the Mat-Su Borough?

]I believe we need tougher punishment on crime! Higher bail, especially for felony crimes, and consistent consequences for all crimes! No more hand-slapping! Unfortunately, at this time, the Borough is dependent on State Troopers to police crime and traffic laws in the unincorporated areas of Mat-Su. I am hearing from borough residents, time and again, that if there is a crime committed such as robbery, vehicle theft, etc, they feel they are powerless. The Troopers hands are tied due to “civil dispute” due to the backlash of SB91.

Q: How do you feel the Borough Assembly should be led in the future, with a strong Mayor or strong Manager form of government?

I believe we should have a strong manager form of government Although it wont be cheap And we would still have to pay a mayor In the long run it might save cost On long term employee turnover . My goal is to have an efficient borough that provides all the services we need and the most financially responsible way. This would allow not only our borough to save money It would also not allow the administration to make political decisions That may affect the borough or borough management causing long term experienced employees to leave and a high turnover rate. With a strong mayor they will bring their own agenda and may not necessarily be qualified even though they won the election as we have seen in Anchorage i do not want to Anchorage our Wasilla!

Q: What role does development of natural resources play in the future of the Borough economy and what changes would you make, if any?

Natural resources should be encouraged to continue. We can no longer depend on tourism to drive Mat-Su economy. COVID made this very apparent! We need to develop the Port Mackenzie Project getting natural gas to ships at the Port. Infrastructure to support the Port, as well as possible railroad access, should be developed as well.

I would also like to push for the possibility of moving the Capital of Alaska to Mat-Su Borough.

Colleen Vague

Q: What do you believe is the most pressing issue for constituents in the borough and how would you work to address this problem if elected?

Roads. We have a failing infrastructure which seeps into other concerns that can’t be truly addressed until this issue corrected. The borough has not kept up with our growing population and our traffic corridors continue to get worse as more people relocate to the Mat-Su from Anchorage. Unfortunately, most of the population moving here commute to their jobs in Anchorage due to the lack of employment opportunities here. There is no easy way to get on and off our major commercial corridors and shop. I believe this is one reason for a decreased interest, on the part of businesses, to relocate to the Mat-Su Valley. We need to be planning now for infrastructure needs 20 – 50 years down the road.

Q: What do you see as the clearest path forward to combat crime and address the issue of police powers in the Mat-Su Borough?

People who commit crimes need to feel there is a viable consequence of jail time. The system currently allows for those committing crimes to go largely unpunished for “minor” crimes; however, like the broken window philosophy, the more frequently a person is allowed to commit “minor” crimes without consequence, the more emboldened they are to continue on this path. There are two solutions: 1) Allow the formation of Police Service Areas, PSA, much like we currently have RSAs in areas that are most affected and desire greater police presence, or 2) move to a First Class Borough where we would have the ability to create a local Sherriff’s Department.

Q: How do you feel the Borough Assembly should be led in the future, with a strong Mayor or strong Manager form of government?

I support a strong Mayor lead government. I believe we have outgrown a Managerial form of government in both population and impact perspectives. Within the past 10 years the Mat-Su Valley has had two governors and one Vice Presidential candidate come from this area. We have to stop accepting the label of a bedroom community for Anchorage and enter the next phase of our growth. That means negotiating with other communities, states and countries in negotiating the exports of our natural resources. Often, other governing bodies desire to speak with an elected leader that is responsible to voters. I’m concerned about lost economic opportunities.

Q: What role does development of natural resources play in the future of the Borough economy and what changes would you make, if any?

We are a resource rich area, and as such we need to be developing this as a viable economic opportunity. We are also an area with land that is fragile and needs protecting. I would like to see a wetlands mitigation plan that protects the safety these wet lands that are so important to our clean water and fish spawning grounds.

Robert Yundt

Q: What do you believe is the most pressing issue for constituents in the borough and how would you work to address this problem if elected?

Currently I'd say interconnectivity of roads and road safety. In the future this will get exponentially worse as our population grows. The Assembly needs to work with our local Senate & House Reps as well as our Governor to start getting matching funds from the State to address these issues.

Q: What do you see as the clearest path forward to combat crime and address the issue of police powers in the Mat-Su Borough?

Too expensive as the State will not refund the MSB any expense for not using the Troopers. Not to mention the State Troopers are amazing but they're stretched thin at best. Our Assembly needs to work with our local Representatives & Governor on trying to secure the funds needed to hire more Troopers.

Q: How do you feel the Borough Assembly should be led in the future, with a strong Mayor or strong Manager form of government?

Strong Manager. The Manager is hired by and answers directly to the Assembly and we would all rather be tried by 7 than hung by 1. Case in point, if Anchorage hadn't recently had an agenda driven "strong Mayor", Ethan Berkowitz would not have had the power and control he needed to create the job killing mandates he did all by himself.

Q: What role does development of natural resources play in the future of the Borough economy and what changes would you make, if any?

Huge potential future. My Grandparents moved to the Valley 70+ years ago so my Grandpa could work in the coal mines & provide a great future for his family. Our Assembly needs to do everything in their power to create a pro business & pro development environment that encourages responsible resource development. The MSB has way too many Residents commuting to Anchorage or the North Slope for work that would much rather have a great paying career here in the Valley.

Assembly 5

Lisa Behrens

Q: What do you believe is the most pressing issue for constituents in the borough and how would you work to address this problem if elected?

One reason I decided to run for Assembly is our need to restore trust and confidence in Borough government. We must improve financial transparency, listen carefully, and ensure citizen access to information regarding Borough decision-making and budgeting. We need to understand the uniqueness of each community, and work more effectively with people. Technology and digital media may help bring public concerns and workable ideas to the Assembly. I will encourage increased citizen participation and access to joint meetings with State and Federal officials, especially where important essential services are at stake, such as road maintenance, public safety and education funding.

Q: What do you see as the clearest path forward to combat crime and address the issue of police powers in the Mat-Su Borough?

Crime is a multi-front, long term battle. Increasing law enforcement presence is only one aspect of the response. We need to address root causes, while providing for crime response. As a paramedic and participant in the Opioid Task Force, I came face to face with drug abuse, a significant contributor to crime. Our problems are complex, and without adequate resources to solve all issues at once, we are forced to prioritize our responses. VWe can choose the type of community law enforcement we want, if any, and how to pay for it. The recent citizens’ task force offered multiple options, including Police Service Areas. Communities should consider and choose the most appropriate, cost effective option for their area.

Q: How do you feel the Borough Assembly should be led in the future, with a strong Mayor or strong Manager form of government?

I believe the Borough needs reliable, responsible leadership. Both structures can work, and each has upsides and downsides. A Strong Mayor generally hires the manager, and carries more political clout. However, leadership can change quickly depending on who is elected. The Strong Manager is hired by the Assembly, which can provide more continuity as Mayors change. The Borough has tried both approaches over the years, and the bottom line remains the same: it is ultimately the decision of Borough voters to elect good leaders. We need more active marketing, public participation, outreach, and accessible information about our numerous opportunities: Education to support the growing health sector; Outdoor recreation and tourism development; Port McKenzie utilization and optimization; Promoting energy efficient practices and explore renewable energy sources.

Q: What role does development of natural resources play in the future of the Borough economy and what changes would you make, if any?

I believe we should revisit the 2010 Economic Development plan, and implement workable items. We must diversify our revenue sources, reduce the tax burden on property owners, and build a sustainable path to our future.

Please contact me anytime: Lisa.Behrens.MSBAK@gmail.com or 907-775-5683. I look forward to working for you.

Ken Koch

Q: What do you believe is the most pressing issue for constituents in the borough and how would you work to address this problem if elected?

Within District 5, where I am running, the most pressing issue is property crime and the lack of adequate law enforcement resources to address it. This is also a pressing issue throughout most of the borough, which relies exclusively on the Alaska State Troopers for law enforcement. (Palmer and Wasilla are the exceptions, since they have their own local police departments.) AST is critically undermanned to meet the law enforcement and crime prevention needs of the Valley, especially in light of our exponential population growth. On the best of days there are, at most, only five troopers on patrol in the Mat Su Valley. If any of them are out sick, on vacation, or in court, that number can quickly drop to only two Troopers patrolling an area bigger than Pennsylvania, several times over! Creating a new borough-wide law enforcement agency would cost too much and take too long (the estimate is 10 years) to become fully effective. There is an alternative that is less expensive and could be up and running much faster. This alternative is a state-borough law enforcement partnership.

Q: What do you see as the clearest path forward to combat crime and address the issue of police powers in the Mat-Su Borough?

As I mentioned above, the clearest path forward for crime prevention is a borough-state law enforcement partnership. I envision a partnership in which the borough funds additional state troopers who are then dedicated to serve in the borough for their entire careers. The state benefits by expanded overall Trooper capacity, and the borough benefits by having those Troopers dedicated to community policing in which the Troopers have an addition personal interest in the area that they serve. This is a much less expensive option than creating a separate law enforcement agency, in large part because the borough does not take on any of the infrastructure expenses of building new police stations, buying police vehicles, etc., but only takes on the personnel expense. Under the current law, the borough does not have police powers. Unfortunately, this prevents the borough from even being able to spend funds towards law enforcement, so this plan will require that the borough assembly work closely with our counterparts in the state legislature to carve out a limited police powers provision for the borough. Ideally this limited police powers provision would allow the borough to have some law enforcement authorities, while the state would retain primary authority and primary responsibility for overall law enforcement. This would allow the borough to have a seat at the

Clayton “Mokie” Tew

Q: What do you believe is the most pressing issue for constituents in the borough and how would you work to address this problem if elected?

The MSB reflects the same governmental budgetary problems from Dahlia Street in Palmer to Washington DC. They spend more than the populace can afford. There are two areas where I know we can save money, they are: open and competitive bidding and running waste disposal more effectively. Our waste disposal costs are $75 more than Anchorage’s and $100 more than California.

Q: What do you see as the clearest path forward to combat crime and address the issue of police powers in the Mat-Su Borough?

The property owners in the MSB cannot afford their own police department. A broader based task force, with representatives from Community Councils, the cities and the Borough that includes members of the city policing and state troopers at the table. The law enforcement professionals could make recommendations and the rest of the Task Force could question and help form a solid solution that we could afford.

Q: How do you feel the Borough Assembly should be led in the future, with a strong Mayor or strong Manager form of government?

The MSB currently is currently a strong manager form of government. Regardless of the power level, each governmental body has a manager. Mayor Berkowitz has not impressed me in his strong mayoral role. I feel that a strong Assembly with ultimate authority over the Management of the MSB is a better design for Alaska’s communities and the MSB.

Q: What role does development of natural resources play in the future of the Borough economy and what changes would you make, if any?

Natural resource development has not been a feature in the MSB. The Governor’s plan to expand resource development, in combination with the A2A rail plan, will definitely have a positive impact on beginning to use Port MacKenzie as the borough planned.

School board

District 3

Ole Larson

Q: How successful has the MSBSD been in preventing the spread of COVID-19 in schools and what changes would you make to mitigation plans, if any?

The Mat-Su has been very successful in preventing the spread of Covid-19 within each schools mitigation plan. The majority of all Covid-19 cases have come into the school from outside sources, not spread from student to student. I feel that we have created a safe learning environment for all students through the mandate of masks, social distancing and handwashing protocols. We are the largest school district in the state that is having in-person learning. There is always room for improvements in any mitigation plans, as they are working documents. These are new times that we must all be flexible and work together.

Q: What specific changes to curriculum would you advocate for if elected?

If I were re-elected, I would advocate for creating our own district wide curriculum. We have many talented and educated professionals within our school district that could contribute to creating a specialized curriculum for Mat-Su. Purchasing curriculum from other companies outside Alaska has failed to produce the necessary results we are seeking. Those programs are very expensive so thinking outside the box; we can use that money to create a specialized curriculum that helps our students succeed.

Q: What drives your involvement in Valley education and how do you gather information about what is happening in local schools?

I am driven to see all children receive a quality education both scholastic and vocational. The better educated a young adult is the more chances of that person becoming a highly productive citizen. I have found the best way to gather information about our local schools is through reading the school board packet, and doing necessary research to become knowledgeable in the subject matter. I also talk to teachers, students, administrators, para-professionals and community members. Talking with people that have a stake in education is a key way to gain knowledge about what is important to them.

Q: How would you advocate for retention of quality education professionals if elected to the School Board?

I feel that retaining highly qualified education professionals is very important and something that we have been and will continue to work on. I feel that if the school board works with state and borough governments to improve work environments then we will be able to achieve retaining the best educators in the state. It is not just something that the school board can achieve alone it is something that they need help from the state and borough. With all parties helping I feel that our education professionals can become leaders in not only the state but also the country.

Jeanne Troshynski

Q: How successful has the MSBSD been in preventing the spread of COVID-19 in schools and what changes would you make to mitigation plans, if any?

MSBSD has been very successful in preventing the spread of COVID-19 in the schools this fall. The work of teachers, support staff, and administration in implementing each school’s unique mitigation plans is impressive. I appreciate the tremendous support the District has received from Dr. Anne Zink and the State of Alaska Public Health Department in providing guidance for the mitigation plans and assistance with contact tracing. My discussions with school personnel indicate that while this has been a challenging time for everyone in the schools, clearly the efforts of staff, students, and parents is working. If elected, I will continue to follow-up with staff and parents to verify that the Board is supporting this on-going battle while assuring students are learning in the best possible environment as selected by their parents.

Q: What specific changes to curriculum would you advocate for if elected?

If elected to the Board, the first curriculum area I would advocate for adoption is Math. Not having had this addressed before the program on hand expired is deeply concerning. The current Board views curriculum through personal biases instead of supporting what is in the best interest of educating students. I will respect the expertise of the educators who serve on the curriculum committees and the process they follow to recommend curriculum to the board that addresses the needs of our diverse student population. I will follow the curriculum development, so I understand the rational of recommendations prior to the Board meetings.

Q: What drives your involvement in Valley education and how do you gather information about what is happening in local schools?

As a retired educator with 36 years of teaching, I want to see excellent education for all students in the valley. Quality education impacts not only the students, but our entire community and economy. In addition, I have 21 years of administrative experience that provides me with an understanding of the District budget and state and borough funding. Currently, I gather information from teachers, principals, support staff, and parents I know. I’ve been listening to the Board meetings since March. If elected I will work hard to be in the schools, at community events, serve on Board committees, read Board packets, and discuss with administration the issues at hand. I will respond to stakeholders when they contact me so that I clearly understand their perspective on issues.

Q: How would you advocate for retention of quality education professionals if elected to the School Board?

I will advocate for the retention of quality education professionals by pushing the board to begin collaboration for all future negotiations now. Recruiting and retaining high quality teachers means we must provide both competitive compensation and a positive work environment.

District 6

Leland Baugus

Q: How successful has the MSBSD been in preventing the spread of COVID-19 in schools and what changes would you make to mitigation plans, if any?

I think the MSBSD has done an outstanding gob getting kids back to school. The efforts in keeping kids’ home that might be sick, utilizing remote learning, increasing in-classroom disinfection with the custodians, and facilitating short turnarounds of classes when a child is found to be COVID positive has enabled the district too remain open. This should be the model for the whole state. Not only does it increase the opportunity for student achievement, it provides for as close to a normal learning environment as possible based on the current COVID status.

Q: What specific changes to curriculum would you advocate for if elected?

With K-12, I would help support traditional curriculum at all levels, however I would help in any way I can to push forward Dr. Trani’s plans to increase the overall academic performance level from what is currently accepted to what is acceptable for students to begin post-secondary coursework without taking remedial courses.

Q: What drives your involvement in Valley education and how do you gather information about what is happening in local schools?

I am motivated by the fact that I still have 3 young children in our school system. They deserve an opportunity to learn in a safe environment without an indoctrinating curriculum and with transparent course work that allows for parents to decide what is best for them. They also deserve the opportunity, if they choose, to win sports scholarships based on the gender they are born with and competition free of performance altering drugs. Being available to listen, discuss, and inform parents in our district is key. If we do not know what is wrong from the parent/taxpayer/customer, we will not know what to investigate/fix. Bringing those concerns to our superintendent and continuing to drill for progress and function within state law is how the School Board should operate.

Q: How would you advocate for retention of quality education professionals if elected to the School Board?

The available funds the school board is allocated to produce a budget comes 35% from the borough property taxes and federal funds and 65% from the state. These are solid numbers. We need to think “outside the box” for cost reductions and doing a good job with less money. Unless the state increases revenue through empowering Alaskan investment, we will have to make even harder choices in the future. I am running because we do not need another educator on the board, we do need a business professional who can look at what we have to work with objectively, so that our education system will survive the even harder times we have ahead.

Dwight Probasco

Q: How successful has the MSBSD been in preventing the spread of COVID-19 in schools and what changes would you make to mitigation plans, if any?

I believe the Mat-Su School District has achieved a high level of success in implementation of their COVID-19 virus mitigation plan. The plan incorporates advice and support from the State of Alaska, community health professionals, and medical practitioners in the Valley. Our District has experienced positive cases of the COVID-19, and each schools’ mitigation response has been exceptionally good. As we are seeing a spike in the number of positive tests nationwide, the challenges of COVID-19 continue. I am optimistic that the District will continue to adapt their plan to minimize positive cases in our schools.

Q: What specific changes to curriculum would you advocate for if elected?

I have listened to several presentations about the “AP for All” program. This program interests me because research shows that students who take AP courses are more likely to graduate on time and are more career ready. I am interested in learning more about this approach and the opportunities it might provide for our students. I will also advocate for the Board to maintain the approved reading list for the secondary language arts.

Q: What drives your involvement in Valley education and how do you gather information about what is happening in local schools?

As a lifelong member of the Mat-Su educational community, first as a student and then as parent and employee, I strongly value education and care about the success of our schools. I am driven to continue my involvement with Valley education to help ensure our students have access to a quality education.

I gather information about current happenings in schools in several ways. In addition to viewing school board meetings, this school year I have attended several school events, spent time reviewing individual school web sites, spoken with students and staff, and listened to the informative podcast “Education Matters”, which was produced by Superintendent Trani and his team.

Q: How would you advocate for retention of quality education professionals if elected to the School Board?

Nationwide, we are experiencing a teacher shortage and we have a responsibility to retain our quality educators. Today there are a vast number of teacher retention studies that address these challenges. Some of the effective strategies that have been identified and implemented include: District and school site administrators establishing a supportive management environment; Districts creating and maintaining teacher mentoring programs; Teachers having access to updated technology; An environment conducive to teaching and learning that includes manageable class sizes, up to date and challenging curriculum, and teacher prep during the school day; A salary schedule that is competitive with Districts of similar size.