Global warming cause is misleading

In reference to Mr. M. Mann’s, a Penn State University professor, response that he and fellow climate change scientists have been defamed by Mr. Loew’s statements. These climate change scientists, along with the environmental movement, have accused humanity of global warming, what do you expect?

I studied this issue a few years back by tracking down the origins of today’s global warming claim by climate change experts. I didn’t pick gaseous CO2 being the cause of global warming, they did. So, that’s what I studied — the change in atmospheric CO2 composition in the years of 1800 AD and 2000 AD, relative to the whole atmosphere.

Here’s where we depart in the facts. Climate change scientists claim that atmospheric CO2 has changed by 20 percent in said time periods. My finding says it’s a grave disservice to the public to present climate change in this manner. It’s patronizing to use your intellect and expertise to mislead the public.

Climate change scientists know that the compositional change in atmospheric CO2 is only 0.0054 percent in said time periods, not 20 percent. If gaseous CO2 composition was around 0.0280 percent atmosphere in 1800 AD and 0.0334 percent atmosphere in 2000 AD, it did not change by 20 percent. Again, the values 0.0280 and 0.0334 percentages gaseous CO2 in said years are values climate change scientists presented their research, I did not make those values up.

It lacks scientific integrity to present gaseous CO2 increasing by 20 percent, and you know that professor. If a substance is a whole, then it can increase by 20 percent. If its part of a solution of many substances like CO2 is in the atmosphere, it has to be presented as its respective fraction of the whole as I’ve shown above.

I studied The Ice Chronicles and the Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change report to understand the origins of this increasing atmospheric CO2 and did not take anything at face value. After months of sifting through abstract commentary and distracting data, it became apparent just how the facts around atmospheric CO2 were manipulated.

Compressing the vertical axis in the presentation of atmospheric CO2 using improper units and only showing the last thousand years is a manipulation of the facts. The Ice Chronicles and IPCC pretty much parroted each other on this matter.

True to scale comparisons shows an insignificant increase (0.005 percent) in gaseous CO2 over the last two hundred years. Nothing that small in science can factually support such change in something as big as earth’s atmosphere.

Today’s global warming is not a unique event in earth’s history. Global warming has occurred many times in earth’s history. The increasing gaseous CO2 composition today is not unique nor does it exceed historical documented values.

Global warming is occurring – no one is denying this occurrence. It’s about climate change scientists accusing humanity of causing global warming. Is global warming a bad thing (they say it is)? Or, is it a natural planetary process (Occam’s razor would say it is)?

Here’s my abstract commentary about global warming that challenges climate change science, it’s called global warming interrupted. The Medieval Warming Period (a fancy name for historical global warming) was interrupted around 1400 AD by The Little Ice Age.

If the Little Ice Age had not occurred, the Medieval Warming Period would have proceeded uninterrupted. That translates into the probability increasing gaseous CO2 would have occurred hundreds of years ago instead of today. My abstract indicates that humanity is not influencing global warming.

Mr. Mann, accusing humanity of causing global warming is defamation. A defamation that more than trivializes any defaming remarks made against climate change scientists by the “accused.” And besides, misleading the public and being accused of manipulation is not defamation as the facts show (0.005 percent versus 20 percent). Segregating out CO2 as you all did is a disservice to objectivity and a betrayal to science.

Furthermore, abstract commentary by anyone is not a fact. Measurements of atmospheric CO2 are tacitly the only facts in this global warming argument. After all, was CO2 measured directly from the atmosphere in 1800 AD or a chunk of ice just a few short years ago. The 1800 AD measurement is closer to being abstract than fact because it did not come directly from the atmosphere, its accuracy of measurement can be questioned.

The very few scientists that do publicly challenge climate change abstract commentary and brave the insults by environmental movement supporters are to be commended. The public needs to demand an end to information anarchy.

It’s not the first time in history that ‘super’ intellects and their want-a-be followers have attempted to oppress the larger population and make us submit to their will — whether it’s voluntary or by force. Imposing international environmental agreements and national laws on the public is nothing more than a power grab for the express purpose of using force. It’s 21st century new-age fascism in the making.

Be aware of ‘Greeks’ bearing ‘gifts’, the gifts of their intellect and devotion to their cause.

Norbert Chowaniec is a University of Alaska graduate in mechanical engineering.