Houston mayor, council should follow rules

To the editor:

I liked your balanced article on the secession question that Roger Purcell

has thrown on the table. I agree that it has been a matter that has been

tossed around for years, but it always comes back to “who’s going to pay

for it/where to draw the line.” Other things to consider would be transfer

of ownership of schools and ambulances, platting and other “areawide”

tasks.

Roger is correct to say that matters can be brought up, without prior

notice, and placed on the “consent agenda” if the matter is not divisive,

and if no debate is anticipated. Usual matters on the consent agenda are

approval of minutes and resolutions recognizing achievements, acceptance of

reports, and other “bland” topics.

Equally at fault with Roger in this process is the rest of the council, who

apparently docilely said, “whatever you say, Mr. Mayor.”

I haven’t personally been on the city council for over 15 years. Yet, I’ve

had other Houston residents ask me what in the world “you and the council

thinks you’re doing” on this matter. It’s obvious that it’s not a

non-controversial subject.

My advice to Mr. Purcell: You’ll get a whole lot further in advancing your

agenda in Houston if you follow the legal protocols and public procedures,

including seeking the opinions of citizens and Council before you make such

proclamations.

I caution the city council and staff to not expend any funds on any

research, until you can do it correctly. I believe the vote to pursue

this matter is null and void as it did not have proper notice.

Elsie O’Bryan

Houston