Proposal to change road service area contract raises a tempest at borough assembly Tuesday, sparks recall effort against assemblyman Mokie Tew

Mat-Su Borough Assemblyman Mokie Tew Frontiersman file photo
Mat-Su Borough Assemblyman Mokie Tew Frontiersman file photo

A resolution that would change the borough’s method for contracting for local road services in the Big Lake Road Service Area has caused a tempest among local residents.

It is also sparking a recall effort for the assemblyman who sponsored the measure, Mokie Tew.

The initial proposal would have implemented a pilot program in the Big Lake area for a “time and materials” procedure, where the contractor charges on the basis of hours at work and materials used.

The current procedure involves a competitive bid by a contractor for services over a three-year period. The resolution sponsored by Tew would also have terminated the current contract held by McKenna Brothers Paving, a veteran contractor that does work in several Mat-Su Road Service Areas.

Big Lake residents turned out in force Tuesday night to protest the action, arguing that time and materials-type contracts have not worked well where they have been tried, such as on the Kenai Peninsula.

“Time-and-materials looks like a cost-plus contract to me,” because there’s little incentive for a contractor to be efficient, said Mike Symanski, a Big Lake resident and a former state senator from Anchorage.

Irene Crowley, another resident of the area, said that when the time-and-materials approach was tried on the Kenai Peninsula it led to 8 percent increase in road service costs to local property owners in one area, 8 percent in another and 7 percent in a third.

Crowley said she and her neighbors were happy with service and rates being charged by the current contractor, McKenna Brothers Paving, and don’t understand why assemblyman Kew wants to make a change.

“We don’t see any benefits to the residents of Big Lake in this,” she said.

Shawn McBride, another local resident, said, “This (new procedure) puts the contractor in a conflict situation with local residents, and if an unscrupulous contractor is involved it could be a financial disaster for people.”At the end of the evening the assembly put the matter on hold. Tew proposed an amendment to his resolution that a task force be appointed to study the matter and make recommendations. Borough manager Mike Brown would appoint the task force. The amendment is pending.

Meanwhile, a recall effort against Tew is being organized by Terry Gorlick and a group of Big Lake residents, Gorlick said. He argued that Tew has a conflict of interest in the matter since his company once held the Big Lake road service contract.

Over 400 signatures were gathered on a petition opposing Tew’s proposed change in the contract method that was presented to the borough assembly Tuesday night, Symanski said.

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Frontiersman.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.