Reader disagrees with editor’s stance

Dear Editor:

I feel compelled to address a commentary written by you, Matt Hickman, the editor of the Frontiersman. This piece was titled, “Right cause, wrong case”; August 5th 2016. It referred to the case involving the theft of a van and, more importantly, the death of an innocent dog, Flash.

You stated that this crime was not a “violent” crime, trivializing the fact that a dog died, at the hands of the two defendants who were responsible for the theft of the vehicle. Should we only punish violent crimes that cause a death, or should any illegal action, that takes a life, be considered reprehensible and therefore worthy of punishment. The manner in which Flash died was harsh and painful; not an easy way to pass. It would have been kinder if they had released him from the van. At least he would have had a chance.

You also referred to the individuals who were present at the courthouse to support the memory of Flash and his guardian, Mark, as the “Justice for Flash mob.” A mob is typically thought of as crowd of people that is disorderly and might cause trouble or violence. The group of people at the courthouse that day had no such intention. It was our hope to draw attention to the fact that a beloved animal was killed, needlessly by the actions of two inhumane individuals.

In addition, you state that the defendants may not have known that Flash was in the vehicle when they stole and abandoned it. I have never known a dog, no matter how old, that would ignore a person, especially a stranger, entering his vehicle.

If the charges regarding the treatment of Flash are thrown out to expedite the case and save taxpayers’ money, our group will be disillusioned and disappointed. It will be difficult to realize that Flash and Mark did not receive the justice that they both deserve. However, our resolve to change the view that the lives of animals are expendable will be strengthened. We are hoping for a time that animals are considered worthy enough to be raised above the level of “property.” Until that day, we will continue to fight for them – it would be wonderful Mr. Hickman, if you joined us, rather than trivialize us and our cause.

— Angie Lewis

Palmer